Persepsi Belia Terhadap Etos Bangsa: Kajian di Lembah Kelang (Perceptions of Youth on the National Ethos: Studies in Kelang Valley)

NAZRI MUSLIM, MOHD MAHADEE ISMAIL, AZIZAH YA'ACOB

Abstract


ABSTRAK: Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi belia terhadap etos bangsa. Kajian ini melibatkan seramai 400 responden yang dipilih sekitar Lembah Kelang. Data kajian diperoleh melalui soal selidik yang dianalisis menggunakan program SPSS. Untuk itu, statistik deskriptif seperti frekuensi, peratusan, min, statistik jadual silang (cross tabulation) dan correlation coefficient digunakan bagi menerangkan latar belakang responden dan persepsi belia terhadap etos bangsa. Hasil kajian menunjukkan persepsi belia terhadap etos bangsa adalah baik. Dapatan kajian juga menunjukkan penerimaan belia terhadap etos bangsa iaitu daripada segi nilai, semangat, kepercayaan dan identiti adalah tinggi.

Kata kunci: Belia; etos bangsa; nilai; semangat; kepercayaan; identiti

 

ABSTRACT: This study aims to analyze the youth perception on the national ethos. About 400 respondents around Kelang Valley were selected to participate in this study. Data was collected through questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, statistical cross tabulation and the correlation coefficient were used to describe the background of the respondents and the perception of youth on the national ethos. The results showed that the youth perception on the national ethos was good. The findings also indicated the youth acceptance of the national ethos in terms of value, belief and identity was high.

Keywords: Youth; national ethos; values; spirit, believe; identity


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Rahman Embong. 2006. Negara-Bangsa: Proses danPerbahasan. Edisi ke-2. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Adey, P. 2012. How to engage? Assemblage as ethos/ethos as assemblage. Dialogues in Human Geography 2(2): 198-201.

Allder, M. 1993. The meaning of ‘school ethos’. Westminster Studies in Education 16: 59-69.

Bar-Tal, D. 2000. Shared Beliefs in a Society: SocialPsychological Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Borg, W. B and Gall, M. D. 1990. Educational Research. Longman: New York.

Burchard, D. J. H. O’S. 2005. Ethos, ethics and endeavors: New horizons in family nursing. Journal of Family Nursing 11(4): 354-370.

Donnelly, C. 2000. In pursuit of school ethos. British Journal of Educational Studies 48(2): 134–154.

Eisner, E. 1994. Editorial in School Climate and Ethos Conference Report. Dundee: Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum.

Etzioni, A. 2009. Minorities and the national ethos. Politics 29(2): 100-110.

Ezhar Tamam, Wendy Yee, Fazilah Idris, Azimi Hamzah, Zainal Abidin Mohamed, Wong Su Luan dan Mansor Mohd Noor. 2005. The relationship of exposure to news media with attachment to the national ethos. Pertanika Journal Social Sciences & Humanities 13(2): 187-198.

Frobish, T. S. 2003. An origin of a theory: A comparison of ethos in the Homeric Iliad with that found in Aristotle’s rhetoric. Rhetoric Review 22(1): 16-30.

Guibernau, M. 2013. Belonging: Solidarity and Division in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining samplesize for research activities. Educational and Psychology Measurement 30(3).

Lomsky-Feder, E. & Rapoport, T. 2001. Homecoming, immigration and the national ethos: Russian – Jewish homecomers reading Zionism. Anthropological Quarterly 74(1): 1-14.

Mahathir Mohamad. 1992. Towards a united Malaysian nation. Ucapan di Majlis Makan Malam United Malaysian Nation by the year 2020. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Penerangan. 31 Januari.

Majid Al-Haj. 2005. National Ethos, Multicultural Education and the New History Textbooks in Israel. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Mansor Mohd Noor, Abdul Rahman Abdul Aziz & Mohamad Ainuddin Iskandar Lee. 2006. Hubungan Etnik di Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Prentice Hall.

McClosky, H. & Brill, A. 1983. Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe About Civil Liberties. New York: Russell Sage Foundations.

McClosky, H. & Zaller, J. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

McLaughlin, T. 2005. The educative importance of ethos. British Journal of Educational Studies 53(3): 306-325.

Mohd Mahadee Ismail. 2015. Sosialisasi Politik, Etos Nasionaldan Negara-Bangsa: Kajian Pendidikan Sivik dan Program Latihan Khidmat Negara (PLKN) dalam kalangan Mahasiswa Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). Tesis Dr. Falsafah, Institut Kajian Etnik, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Mohd Majid Konting. 1990. Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Nor Hashimah Jalaluddin, Shamsul Amri Baharuddin, Mustafa Omar & Mansor Mohd. Noor. 2004. Identiti nasional dan etos bangsa. Dewan Budaya 26(8): 9-13.

Nor Hashimah Jalaluddin, Shamsul Amri Baharuddin, Mustafa Omar & Mansor Mohd. Noor. 2003. Pengasimilasian identiti nasional dan etos bangsa di kalangan rakyat Malaysia: Satu kajian sosio-budaya. Laporan Penyelidikan. Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Oppenheim, A. N. 2004. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Heinemann.

Oren, N. 2009. The Israeli Ethos of Conflict 1967-2006. GeorgeMason University: Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution.

Schwaninger, M. 2006. Intelligent Organizations Powerful Models for Systemic Management. Berlin: Springer.

Sekaran, U. 1992. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Second Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Speake, J. 1999. The Oxford essential dictionary of foreign terms in English. Berkley Books, Oxford UniversityPress. www .oxfordreference.com/vies/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t33.e2286 [13 Feb 2012].

Swenson, D. 2008. Religion and Family Link. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Tuckman, B.W. 1999. Conducting Educational Research. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Wiersma, W. 1995. Research Methods in Education: An Introduction. Boston Allyn and Bacon.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

ISSN 2289-1706 | e-ISSN : 2289-4268 

Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu (ATMA)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan
MALAYSIA

© Copyright UKM Press, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia