Rhetoric on Trial: An Aristotelian Insight into Najib Razak’s Corruption Case
Abstract
Political rhetoric plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse and perceptions of corruption. The way in which the public perceives corruption and values anti-corruption rhetoric can significantly affect their trust in political institutions and inclinations towards politicians. Thus, anti-corruption rhetoric has been recognised as a strategic tool for political parties during elections. Nonetheless, there is a recorded tension between rhetoric’s ethical and political dimensions, particularly in corrupt regimes where political rhetoric may serve various purposes. This study critically examines the rhetorical strategies employed by Najib Razak in response to his corruption allegations and the court’s verdict, thereby addressing a gap in the literature on political rhetoric within legal challenges. Through a qualitative content analysis of 21 news broadcasts from ASTRO Awani, the study applies Aristotle’s triadic model of persuasion—ethos, pathos, and logos. The findings indicate that Najib predominantly relies on logos and pathos, strategically leveraging logical reasoning and emotional appeal while minimising the use of ethos¾ethical credibility. This selective use of rhetorical strategies suggests a deliberate effort to influence public perception amid legal challenges. The study highlights the ethical concerns surrounding such rhetorical practices, particularly in democratic contexts where public trust and legal accountability are crucial. By critically analysing Najib’s rhetoric, this study contributes to a broader understanding of the intricate relationship between rhetoric, political legitimacy, and public perception, emphasising the need to scrutinise political discourse in corruption-related contexts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abadi, Abdul Muein. (2021). Kleptocracy and Foreign Loan Decision-Making Process: Insights from Malaysia’s Deals and Renegotiations with China. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(1), (135–158), 186810342110584. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211058470
Abdullah, Aiman Saddiq. (2019, December 23). Sumpah laknat tiada dalam perundangan Islam: Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan. Sinar Harian. https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/63122/berita/nasional/sumpah-laknat-tiada-dalam-perundangan-islam-mufti-wilayah-persekutuan
Aronson, O., Elad‐Strenger, J., Kessler, T., & Feldman, Y. (2022). Does personalisation of officeholders undermine the legitimacy of the office? On perceptions of objectivity in legal decision-making. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12495
Awani, A. (2018, June 30). Najib mahu ahli dan pemimpin baharu betulkan keadaan. Www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itMKjcsvNAs&t=3s
Awani, A. (2018, November 22). Najib letak kesalahan Goldman Sachs gagal nasihat kepincangan. Www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQ3vApgQ-vU
Awani, A. (2018, September 20). “Saya bukan pencuri” - DS Najib Razak. Www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUzUJOq0ZN0
Awani, A. (2019, December 23). #AWANIByte: Najib Razak lafaz sumpah laknat di hadapan ratusan jemaah. Www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naamhD3KoTw
Awani, A. (2021, December 8). Kes SRC | Saya kecewa dikatakan “memalukan negara” - Najib. Www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPp-YqHowGY
Awani, A. (2021, November 19). Saya dan isteri dijadikan bahan lawak - Najib. Www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjAn_u_LWqQ
Awani, A. (2022, August 14). Rayuan Akhir SRC | Esok hari penting buat saya - Najib Razak. Www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjS6ZPK8alQ
Awani, A. (2022, August 24). Nota Najib Razak | 'My family, My love, Setakat ini sahaja kita dapat bersama. www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4k0GMWe2gM
Awani, A. (2022, June 8). Kes SRC International | Najib mahu batal sabitan, dakwa Nazlan ada konflik sendiri. Www.youtube.com. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ0s8z8prXs
Bernama. (2022, August 23). Timeline of Najib’s SRC case. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2022/08/23/timeline-of-najibs-src-case
Bronstein, J. (2013). Like me! Analysing the 2012 presidential candidates’ Facebook pages. Online Information Review, 37(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-01-2013-0002
Bronstein, J., Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2018). Politicians’ use of Facebook during elections. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-03-2018-0067
Burnyeat, M. (1994) ‘Enthymeme: The logic of persuasion’, in D. J. Furley and A. Nehemas (eds), Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 3–55.
Burnyeat, M., Frede, M., & Scott, D. (2015). The pseudo-platonic seventh letter. Oxford University Press.
Canetti, D., Elad-Strenger, J., Lavi, I., Guy, D., & Bar-Tal, D. (2016). Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(1), 84–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715569771
Carreras, M. and Vera, S. (2018). Do corrupt politicians mobilise or demobilise voters? a vignette experiment in Colombia. Latin American Politics and Society, 60(3), 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2018.25
Case, W. (2017). Stress testing leadership in Malaysia: the 1MDB scandal and Najib Tun Razak. The Pacific Review, 30(5), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1282538
CHENG‐MATSUNO, V., & BERLINER, D. (2023). Do voters differentially punish transnational corruption? European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12643
Crines, AS (2013) Why did Boris Johnson win the 2012 mayoral election? Public Policy And Administration Research, 3(9). 1 - 7. ISSN 2224-5731
Davoudi, S., Galland, D., & Stead, D. (2019). Reinventing Planning and planners: Ideological Decontestations and Rhetorical Appeals. Planning Theory, 19(1), 147309521986938. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219869386
Demirdöğen, Ü. (2010). The roots of research in (political) persuasion: Ethos, pathos, logos, and the Yale studies of persuasive communications. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 3(1), 189–201. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/164133
Diebaa, Farrah Rashid Ali., & Su’ad Awab. (2023). Legitimising Governance Through Vocational Roles: A Conceptual Metaphor Analysis of Budget Speeches. Asia in Transition, 18(2364-8260), 53–75. SpringerOpen. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5334-7_4
Dressel, B., & Cristina Regina Bonoan. (2024). Courts and authoritarian populism in Asia: Reflections from Indonesia and the Philippines. Law & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12240
Dubov, A. (2015). Ethical persuasion: the rhetoric of communication in critical care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(3), 496-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12356
Edgar, V. C., Brennan, N., & Power, S. B. (2021). The language of profit warnings: a case of denial, defiance, desperation, and defeat. Accounting, Auditing &Amp; Accountability Journal, 35(9), 28-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-04-2020-4519
Fatmawati, Nur., Amin, Muhammad., & Nawawi, Nawawi. (2020, August 28). Communication Science Studies – Spoken Discourse Analysis Verbal Rhetoric and Leadership Style: A Comparative Study of Tun Dr. Mahathir Bin Mohamad and Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak. Www.atlantis-Press.com; Atlantis Press.
https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200827.069
Finlayson, A. (2007). From Beliefs to Arguments: Interpretive Methodology and Rhetorical Political Analysis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(4), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00269.x
Finlayson, A. (2012). Rhetoric and the Political Theory of Ideologies. Political Studies, 60(4), 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00948.x
Genovese, M. A. (2023). The Legacy of Watergate and the Nixon Presidency. Springer Nature.
Grapă, T.-E., & Mogoș, A.-A. (2023). The Spectacle of “Patriotic Violence” in Romania: Populist Leader George Simion’s Mediated Performance. Media and Communication, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6367
Hall, J. (2020). In search of enemies: Donald Trump’s populist foreign policy rhetoric. Politics, 41(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720935377
Heracleous, L., Paroutis, S., & Lockett, A. (2019). Rhetorical Enthymeme: The Forgotten Trope and its Methodological Import. European Management Review, 17(1), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12377
Ivie, R. L. (2015). Enabling democratic dissent. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2015.994900
Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2009). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8
Jörke, D. (2014). Rhetoric as Deliberation or Manipulation? About Aristotle’s Rhetoric and its Misuse in Recent Literature. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 17(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.7227/r.17.1.4
Kjeldsen, J. E., Kock, C., & Vigsø, O. (2021). Political rhetoric in Scandinavia. In bora.uib.no. Nordicom. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2763090
Kyei, E., Thomas Oduro Kwarteng, Wilson Awiah Jujugenia, Salomey Horsu, Essah-Ntiful, D., & Michael Kwame Appiah. (2023). “Money Doesn’t Like Noise.” Linguistics Initiative, 3(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.3181
Lacatus, C., & Meibauer, G. (2021). Crisis, Rhetoric and Right-Wing Populist Incumbency: An Analysis of Donald Trump’s Tweets and Press Briefings. Government and Opposition, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.34
Lambropoulou, E. (2021). The Janus faces of (anti-)corruption rhetoric in Greece. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University Sociology, 14(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.304
Lape, S. (2016). The state of blame: politics, competition, and the Courts in democratic Athens. Critical Analysis of Law, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33137/cal.v3i1.26453
Larsson, O., Naurin, D., Derlén, M., & Lindholm, J. (2016). Speaking Law to Power: The Strategic Use of Precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 50(7), 879–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016639709
Liu, Chang., Chen, Shouming., & Shao, Qiuyue. (2019). Do CEO Rhetorical Strategies Affect Corporate Social Performance? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(18), 4907. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184907
Madestam, J., & Falkman, L. L. (2017). Rhetorical construction of political leadership in social media. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-10-2016-0204
Major, M. W. (2022). Resume research questions through the seven philosophical foundations of communication. SAGE Open, 12(2), 215824402210961. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221096144
Molina, A. D., & Spicer, M. W. (2004). Aristotelian Rhetoric, Pluralism, and Public Administration. Administration & Society, 36(3), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704265293
Muñoz, J., Anduiza, E., & Gallego, A. (2016). Why do voters forgive corrupt mayors? implicit exchange, credibility of information and clean alternatives. Local Government Studies, 42(4), 598-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1154847
Nain, Zaharom. (2023, June 14). Malaysia. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023/malaysia
Naxera, V. (2018). The never-ending story: Czech governments, corruption, and populist anti-corruption rhetoric (2010–2018). Politics in Central Europe, 14(3), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2018-0017
Newman, N., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619576
Noorshahrizam, Shahrin Aizat., Wern. Jun. Soo. (2023, April 1). Despite Federal Court rejection, Najib’s legacy seen surviving thanks to strange bedfellows. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/04/01/despite-federal-court-rejection-najibs-legacy-seen-surviving-thanks-to-strange-bedfellows/62558
Norziaton, I.K., & Sabri, Zatun. Najmiah. Mohd. (2022). The determinants of indulgence in corruption among law enforcement personnel in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 17(1), 311-331. https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v17i1-12
Osman, Zamimah. Ismail, Sharifah. Fazliyatun. Shaik., & Yusoff, Nuraini. (2017). Retorik dalam pengucapan Strategi Lautan Biru. Journal on Leadership and Policy, 2(1), 108-125.
Prabakaran, Madhu. (2020). Enhancing Competitive Advantage through Investments in Ethical Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3619174
Russell, A. (2017). US senators on Twitter: asymmetric party rhetoric in 140 characters. American Politics Research, 46(4), 695-723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x17715619
Santos, P., & Ndhlovu, M. P. (2021). The democratic deficit in reporting political crises: The case of Zimbabwe’s 2018 elections. Journalism, 146488492110129. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211012928
Sheng, Xiayan., Zeng, Zhenhua., Zhang, Wen., & Hu, Yuanhui. (2022). Vlogger’s persuasive strategy and consumers’ purchase intention: The dual mediating role of para-social interactions and perceived value. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1080507
Sprute, J. (1994) ‘Aristotle and the legitimacy of rhetoric’, in D. J. Furley and A. Nehemas (eds), Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 117–128.
Starkey, D. J. (2015). Editorial. International Journal of Maritime History, 27(3), 385-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0843871415592087
Stilwell, A., & Utych, S. (2021). Gender and Justification in Political Scandal. American Politics Research, 50(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211041145
Sujoko, A. (2021). Political Rhetoric of East Java’s Governor and Deputy Governor Candidates. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 6(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v6i1.847
Tan, Debbita. Ai. Lin., & Al-Rikaby, Ali. Badeen. Mohammed. (2022). Aristotelian framing in political discourse: A case study of Malaysian Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin’s exclusive interview with Radio Televisyen Malaysia and the news agency Bernama. In Adversarial Political Interviewing: Worldwide Perspectives During Polarized Times
(pp. 109-126). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Törnqvist, N. (2021). Drizzling sympathy: ideal victims and flows of sympathy in Swedish courts. International Review of Victimology, 28(3), 263-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580211035586
Waddell, N. and McKenna, B. (2009). The colour of rhetoric in the contemporary agora. Revista Alicantina De Estudios Ingleses, 22, 271. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.16
Wang, Ching-Hsing. (2015). Government performance, corruption, and political trust in East Asia*. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12223
Zainal Anuar, Mohamad. Zamri., & Jalli, Nuurianti. (2020). “Malu Apa Bossku?” Najib Razak’s political rhetoric on Facebook post-2018 general election / Mohamad Zamri Zainal Anuar and Nuurianti Jalli. Forum Komunikasi (FK), 15(1), 1–29. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/42134
Zhang, Hong. (2021). A rhetorical approach to critical reading of literary texts. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n3p39
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2403-05
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021