The Effects of Instruction of Formulaic Sequences and Working Memory on Malaysian ESL Learners’ Oral Fluency
Abstract
Despite being exposed to the English language for more than 13 years, Malaysian students have yet to reach the required proficiency level (i.e. appropriate selection and appropriate speech production in general and oral fluency in particular). Many of them experience difficulties at the workplace due to inadequate English skills, particularly in speaking. This study sheds light on the effects of explicit instruction of Formulaic Sequences (FSs) on low-intermediate and intermediate Malaysian ESL learners’ use of formulaic sequences and oral fluency while considering their working memory capacity. A sample of 54 students enrolled in a preparatory English language course was selected through purposive sampling. They were classified as intermediate and low-intermediate ESL learners based on their Malaysian University English Test (MUET) results with band scores of 2 and 3, categorized as low-intermediate and intermediate users, respectively.They were divided into two groups: the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG) by selecting them as similar as possible. The EG received a specific treatment encompassed the explicit instruction of FSs, fluency workshops, and conscious-raising awareness activities, embedded in the regular content materials for fifteen sessions with three-hour-long each session. Both samples were pre-tested and post-tested, followed by semi-structured interviews. In sum, both quantitative and qualitative findings revealed positive effects of explicit instruction of FSs on the participants’ use of FSs and their L2 oral fluency related variables. However, the correlation between the working memory (WM) and participants’ performance did not reach the hypothesized level. The results also supported the proficiency-related and language-dependent features of WM, the general capacity and general processing hypotheses, and the task-specific view. By integrating both communicative and cognitive approaches, this research would benefit the curriculum and syllabus designers, test developers and lecturers in ESL contexts for quality education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allami, H., Karlsson, M., & Shahroosvand, H. R. (2022). Conventional and nonconventional use of idioms in general vs. academic corpora of English as a lingua franca. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 44-57.
Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL learners’ challenges in speaking English in Malaysian classroom. Development, 10(2), 983-991.
Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and Challenges of English Language Education Reform in Malaysian Primary Schools. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3).
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual review of psychology, 63, 1-29.
Baddeley, A., Papagno, C., &Vallar, G. (1988). When long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of memory and language, 27(5), 586-595.
Bakhshizadeh, Y., Rahimi Domakani, M., & Rajaei, M. (2015). The effect of explicit instruction of formulaic sequences on oral proficiency improvement of young Iranian EFL students. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(10), 44-52.
Baleghizadeh, S., & Shafeie, S. (2019). The Effect of Teaching Formulaic Sequences through Spaced and Non-spaced Retrievals on Iranian EFL Learners' Oral Fluency. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 11(24), 79-114.
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83-110.
Brumfit, C. (2000). Accuracy and fluency: The basic polarity. In Perspectives on fluency (pp. 61-73). University of Michigan.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Handbook of research on teaching, 171-246.
Cantor, J., & Engle, R. W. (1993). Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: An individual-differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1101.
Carruthers, P. (2013). Evolution of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (Supplement 2), 10371-10378.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Čolović-Marković, J. (2012). The effects of explicit instruction of formulaic sequences on second-language writers. Department of Linguistics, University of Utah.
Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 123(4), 354.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). The design and conduct of true experiments and quasi-experiments in field settings Reproduced in part in Research in Organizations: Issues and Controversies: Goodyear Publishing Company.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Collecting qualitative data. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Fourth ed. Boston: Pearson, 204-235.
Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of memory and language, 25(1), 1-18.
Darmi, R., & Albion, P. (2013). English language in the Malaysian education system: Its existence and implications. Proceedings of the 3rd Malaysian Postgraduate Conference (MPC 2013).
David, A. R., Thang, S. M., &Azman, H. (2015). Accommodating Low Proficiency ESL Students' language Learning Needs Through an Online Writing Support. System.e-Bangi, 10(1), 118.
De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's' speaking'model adapted. Applied Linguistics 13 [1], 1-24: Oxford, OUP. Ref Type: Generic.
Doane, D. P., & Seward, L. E. (2011). Measuring skewness: a forgotten statistic? Journal of Statistics Education, 19(2).
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(1), 234-250.
Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17-44.
Enxhi, S. Y., Hoon, T. B., & Fung, Y. M. (2012). Speech disfluencies and mispronunciations in English oral communication among Malaysian undergraduates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(7), 19-32.
Fillmore, C. J. (1979; 2000). On fluency In:H. Riggenbach (ed.) (2000), Perspectives on fluency, 43-60. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.:Elsevier.
Fong, Y. A., Ravindran, L. & Al-Shaibani, G. K. S. (2022). Oral presentation anxiety among undergraduate Malaysian Chinese students in a private university. AJTLHE 14(1), 59-77.
Fortkamp, M. B. M. (1999). Working memory capacity and aspects of L2 speech production. Communication & Cognition, 32(3-4), 259–295.
Foster, P. (2001). Rules & routines: a consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P.Skehan&M. Swain (eds.) Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching and testing (p. 79). London, New York: Longman.
Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Is non-word repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the non-words. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 83-94.
Georgiadou, E., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Investigating Executive Working Memory and Phonological Short-Term Memory in Relation to Fluency and Self-Repair Behavior in L2 Speech. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 46(4), 877-895.
Guará-Tavares, M. d. G. (2013). Working memory capacity and L2 speech performance in planned and spontaneous conditions: a correlational analysis. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, 52(1), 09-29.
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 25-38.
Idek, S., Fong, L. L., Sidhu, G. K., & Hoon, T. S. (2014). The use of consciousness- raising tasks in promoting the correct use of the verb" be" among students in vocational colleges. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(9), 1792.
Jackson, E., Leitao, S., & Claessen, M. (2016). The relationship between phonological short‐term memory, receptive vocabulary, and fast mapping in children with specific language impairment. International journal of language &communication disorders, 51(1), 61-73.
Jasim, Y. B. (2023). Restating Research Findings in Research Articles Discussion Section: A Corpus Analysis of Linguistic Cues and Lexical Bundles. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 23(1).
Ka-kan-dee, M. & Al-Shaibani, G. K. S. (2018). Tourism Students’ Oral Presentation Anxiety: A Case Study. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26 (T), 231-256.
Kamsin, S. R., & Mohamad, M. (2020). The implementation of highly immersive programme (Hip) speaking activities in Malaysian schools: A literature review. Creative Education, 11(09), 1783.
Keller, E., & Warner, S. (2005). Gambits 3: Conversational tools: Responders, Closers and Inventory Canadian Government Publishing.
Khodadady, E., &Shamsaee, S. (2012). Formulaic sequences and their relationship with speaking and listening abilities. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 39-49.
Kormos, J., &Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 11(2), 261-271.
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language learning, 40(3), 387-417.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
McGuire, M., & Larson-Hall, J. (2017). Teaching formulaic sequences in the classroom: Effects on spoken fluency. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 1-25.
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 379-413.
Mizera, G. J. (2006). Working memory and L2 oral fluency. {Doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh}, Pittsburgh.
Nadesan, N. K., & Shah, P. M. (2020). Non-linguistic challenges faced by Malaysian students in enhancing speaking skills. Creative Education, 11(10), 1988.
Narkprom, N., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2022). Lexical Bundles in Native English Speakers' and Thai Writers' Dissertations. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(3).
Nation, P. (1989). Improving speaking fluency. System, 17(3), 377-384.
Natsumi. (2014). The Development of Formulaic Language in L2. Bulletin of Tsuru University Research, 2(79), 43-57.http://trail.tsuru.ac.jp/dspace/handle/trair/651.
Nergis, A. (2021). Can explicit instruction of formulaic sequences enhance L2 oral fluency?. Lingua, 255, 103072.
Nijat, N., Atifnigar, H., Chandran, K., Selvan, S. L. T., & Subramonie, V. (2019). Psychological factors that affect English speaking performance among Malaysian primary school pupils. American International Journal of Education and Linguistics Research, 2(2), 55-68.
Oberauer, K. (2010). Declarative and procedural working memory: common principles, common capacity limits? Psychologica Belgica, 50(3-4), 3-4.
Oberg, K., & Pavlov, V. (2013). Formulaic Sequences for Improving Oral Fluency. [M.A. dissertation, University of Wisconsin}, River Falls.
Ohlrogge, A. (2009). Formulaic expressions in intermediate EFL writing assessment. Formulaic language, 2, 375-386.
Ong, C. T. L., Leong, A. C. K., & Singh, P. K. S. (2016). Employer Expectations of Language at the Workplace. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 7(2), 22.
Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(4), 287-289.
Pawley, A., &Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and communication, 191, 225.
Qi, Y., & Ding, Y. (2011). Use of formulaic sequences in monologues of Chinese EFL learners. System, 39(2), 164-174.
Rafieyan, V. (2018). Role of knowledge of formulaic sequences in language proficiency: significance and ideal method of instruction. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 1-23.
Rezai, M. J., & Okhovat, B. (2016). The Effect of Working Memory on EFL Learners’ Oral Fluency. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 74.
Roberts, R., & Gibson, E. (2002). Individual differences in sentence memory. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 31(6), 573-598.
Rosenshine, B. (1997). The case for explicit, teacher-led, cognitive strategy instruction. MF Graves (Chair), what sort of comprehension strategy instruction should schools provide. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. March.
Salthouse, T. A., & Babcock, R. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763.
Schmidt, R. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(4), 357-385.
Sidek, H. M. (2010). An analysis of the EFL secondary reading curriculum in Malaysia: Approaches to reading and preparation for higher education. {Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh}.
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied linguistics, 31(4), 487-512.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation: Oxford University Press.
Taguchi, N. (2013). Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience. System, 41(1), 109-121.
Temple, L. (1997). Memory and processing modes in language learner speech production. Communication & Cognition. Monographies, 30(1-2), 75-90.
Tsou, W., & Huang, Y. (2012). The effect of explicit instruction in formulaic sequences on academic speech fluency. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 4 (2), 57-80.
Uchihara, T., Eguchi, M., Clenton, J., Kyle, K., & Saito, K. (2022). To what extent is collocation knowledge associated with oral proficiency? A corpus-based approach to word association. Language and Speech, 65(2), 311-336.
Van Vu, D., & Peters, E. (2022). The role of formulaic sequences in L2 speaking. In The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking (pp. 285-298). Routledge.
Vasylets, O., & Marín, J. (2021). The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing. Journal of Second language writing, 52, 100786.
Vu, D. C., Nguyen, T. V., & Kitjaroonchai, N. (2024). Exploring the Relationship Between Working Memory Capacity and L2 Oral Fluency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(7), 2002-2012.
Wahi, W. (2015). English language literacies of undergraduate students in Malaysia's culturally and linguistically diverse environment: Casualties of national language policies and globalisation? Education Research and Perspectives (Online), 42, 329.
Weissheimer, J., & Mota, M. B. (2011). Working Memory Capacity and the Development of L2 Speech Production: A Study of Individual Differences. Gisela Granena et al., (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2010 Second Language Research Forum (169-181), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project
Williams, J. N., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language learning, 53(1), 67-121.
Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background,evidence and classroom applications. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 12,72-75, 87-96. pages 1-333.
Yan, X. (2020). Unpacking the relationship between formulaic sequences and speech fluency on elicited imitation tasks: Proficiency level, sentence length, and fluency dimensions. Tesol Quarterly, 54(2), 460-487.
Yu, Y. (2022). The role of psycholinguistics for language learning in teaching based on formulaic sequence use and oral fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1012225.
Zwiers, J., & Crawford, M. (2009). How to start academic conversations. Educational Leadership, 66(7), 70-73.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2404-11
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021