Profiling CEFR-Basic Readers at Primary Schools through Their Eye Movement Behaviours
Abstract
This study profiles CEFR-basic readers in Malaysia by examining their eye movements and fixations during reading comprehension tasks in response to the studies conducted by Cambridge Assessment in Malaysia in 2013 and 2018. To this end, forty 12-year-old school pupils at A1/A2 reading proficiency level were observed using Tobii Pro Glasses 100hz. The participants were asked to read three texts and answer ten multiple-choice questions. Data were transformed into statistics and gaze plots. The results of the experiment indicate that basic readers in this study have an average first pass duration (FPD) of 0.50-0.59 seconds and an average second pass duration (SPD) of 0.76-0.81 seconds. This study also found four pejorative behaviours that can impede the process of reading: 1) rereading at micro level, 2) limited processing capacity for sentences of more than 14 words, 3) negative skipping and, 4) desegmentation. Through these behaviours, this study highlights the importance of improving the readers’ reading skills to improve the quality of their SPD as it is related to the ability to process and integrate the various subprocesses involved in reading. While this study suggests the need for further replication in diverse reading environments, it also provides valuable insights into the current reading proficiency of Year 6 pupils in their second language.
Keywords: A1/A2; CEFR-Basic Readers; Eye Movements; Reading Proficiency; Reader Profiles
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azman, H., Mihat, W. & Soh, O. K. (2021). Analysing stimuli presentations and interview protocols to improve the data collection guidelines for reading research. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT). 11(2), 51-65.
Brysbaert, M. & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception (pp. 125–147). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cambridge English Language Assessment. (2013). Cambridge Baseline 2013: English Language in Malaysian Schools (Result Report). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Cambridge English Language Assessment. (2014). KEY English Test: Sample Test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge English Language Assessment. (2018). Completion report: An evaluation of the nationwide implementation of the new CEFR-aligned curriculum at Pre-school, Primary Years & Secondary Forms. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Capel, A. & Sharp, W. (2013). Objective KEY: Student’s book. Cambridge University Press.
Chang, A. C. S., & Millet, S. (2015). Improving reading rates and comprehension through audio assisted extensive reading for beginner learners. System. 52, 91–102.
Conklin, K., Alotaibi, S., Pellicer-Sanchez, A., & Vilkait, E. L. (2020). What eye-tracking tells us about reading-only and reading-while-listening in a first and second language. Second Language Research. 36(3), 257–276.
Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2016). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 5th Ed. London: Sage.
Cunnings, I. (2018). Eye tracking workshop: Connect’M Conference [Powerpoint Slides]. GoogleDrive.https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1GQbyDpcydvk55ZsiZQ8TIEOH3FW_bl/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105509701069818641994&rtpof=true&sd=true
Dolgunsöz, E. (2015). Measuring attention in second language reading using Eye-tracking: The case of the noticing hypothesis. Journal of Eye Movement Research. 8(5), 1–18.
Godfroid, A. (2019). Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A Research synthesis and methodological guide. New York: Routledge.
Godfroid, A., Winke, P. & Conklin, K. (2020). Exploring the depths of second language processing with eye tracking: An introduction. Second Language Research. 36(3), 243–255.
Gough, P.B. & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education. 7, 6–10.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoover, W. A. & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing. 2(2), 127–160.
Jaafar, N. M., & Thang, S. M. (2020). Processing of a multi-representational science passage by ESL learners. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 20(4), 18–29.
Joshi, R. M. (2019). The componential model of reading (CMR): Implications for assessment and instruction of literacy problems. In D. A. Kilpatrick, R. M. Joshi & R. K. Wagner (Eds.). Reading Development and Difficulties: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice (pp. 3–18). Switzerland: Springer.
Miles, K. P. & Ehri, L. C. (2019). Reading development and difficulties: Bridging the gap between research and practice. In D. A. Kilpatrick, R. M. Joshi & R. K. Wagner (Eds.). Reading Development and Difficulties: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice (pp. 63–82). Switzerland: Springer.
Mihat, W., Azman, H. & Soh, O. K. (2018). Bringing reading research in multilingual Nusantara into a new direction through eye-tracking. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS). 3(2), 107–123.
Mohd Yusof, S., Mohd Lazim, Z., Salehuddin, K., & Mohamad Shahimin, M. (2020). Graphic novels: Understanding how fifth graders read literary text through eye movement analysis. Kritika Kultura. 33/34, 388–427.
Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (1988). Becoming a skilled reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 11(4), 357–383.
Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2009). Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: Implications for event-related potential research. Biological Psychology. 80, 4–9.
Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J. & Clifton, C. (2012). Psychology of Reading, 2nd Ed. New York: Psychology Press.
Reichle, E. D., & Sheridan, H. (2015). E-Z Reader: An overview of the model and two recent applications. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 277–290). Oxford University Press.
Reingold, E. M., Yang, J., & Rayner, K. (2010). The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: Evidence for lexical control of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1677–1683.
Shukri, N. H. A., Nasir, M. K. M., & Razak, K. A. (2020). Educational strategies on memorizing the Quran: A review of literature. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education & Development. 9(2), 632–648.
Spear-Swerling, L. (2013). A road map for understanding reading disabilities and other reading problems, redux. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau & R. B. Ruddel (Eds.). Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 412–437). Barksdale: International Reading Association.
Spear-Swerling, L. (2015). The power of RTI and reading profiles: A blueprint for solving reading problems. London: Paul. H. Brookes.
Stoops, A. & Christianson, K. (2019). Parafoveal processing of inflectional morphology in Russian: A within-word boundary-change paradigm. Vision Research. 158, 1–10.
Tragant, E. & Vallbona, A. (2018). Reading while listening to learn: Young EFL learners’ perceptions. ELT Journal. 72(4), 395–404.
Urquhart, A. & Weir, J. C. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process and product. London: Longman.
Webb, S., & Chang, C.S. (2012). Vocabulary learning through assisted and unassisted repeated reading. Canadian Modern Language Review. 68(3), 267–290.
Weir, C. & Khalifa, H. (2008). A cognitive processing approach towards defining reading comprehension. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes. 31, 2–10.
Wooldrige, L. (2017). The simple view of reading: Part 1. Retrieved on August 10th, 2018 from: https://ortongillinghamonlinetutor.com/the-simple-view-of-reading-svr-part-1/
Ya Shak, M. S., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Tahir, M. H. M., & Adam, M. H. M. (2021). The use of imported CEFR-aligned English language textbooks in Malaysian schools: Issues and concerns. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 11(9), 954–963.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2302-01
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021