Persuasive Techniques in Okonjo-Iweala's Speech: A Study of Quasilogical, Presentational, and Analogical Strategies
Abstract
Persuasion is an important aspect of giving a speech. It can be achieved through various persuasive strategies. Past studies related to persuasion have predominantly focused on male politicians’ inauguration, presidential campaigns, and legislative debates, however, not many have focused on speeches delivered by reputable female leaders. Thus, the present study aims to examine the persuasive strategies employed by Okonjo-Iweala in her 2021 International Women’s Day speech. This speech was analysed using Johnstone's (1989) persuasive strategies and the findings showed that she utilised quasilogical (60.86%), presentational (34.79%) and analogical (4.35%) strategies of persuasion in her speech. In other words, quasilogical strategies were used most frequently compared to the other strategies and were expressed through enthymemes, syllogisms, and subordinate clauses (result, conditional, and causal clauses) to relate premises to conclusions in her speech. It was then followed by presentational strategies when Okonjo-Iweala involved her audience and aroused their emotions through the use of rhetorical deixis, repetition, and parallelism in her speech. She also reminded her audience of the importance of gender equality in trade, economics, and leadership with the use of an analogical strategy. This study hopes to contribute to the field of women’s discourse in social practices and persuasive discourse in leadership.
Keywords: persuasive strategies; persuasion; speech; women; discourse
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aldahshan, D. A. S. (2020). Persuasive strategies in the English translations of the al-Baqarah Quranic verses [Master’s thesis, Universiti Malaya]. UM Student's Repository.
Alkhawaldeh, A. A. (2021). Persuasive strategies of Jordanian government in fighting COVID-19. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 21(1), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-16
Balakrishnan, G. (2019). Argumentative structure and persuasive discourse strategies in the Malaysian secondary school English debate finals [Master’s thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia]. UPM eTheses.
Beebe, S. A., & Beebe, S. J. (2018). Public speaking: An audience-centered approach (10th ed.). Pearson.
Center for Global Development. (n.d.). Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. https://www.cgdev.org/expert/ngozi-okonjo-iweala
Darweesh, A. D., & Mehdi, M. K. (2019). Persuasive strategies in Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign speeches. Education and Linguistics Research, 5(2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v5i2.15489
Dellaert, M. (2017). Influencing: Learn how to use the skill of persuasion [White paper]. Centre for creative leadership. https://www.ccl.org/articles/white-papers/learn-persuasion-skills/
Faris, A. A., Paramasivam, S., Tan, B. H., & Zamri, A. M. (2016). Persuasive strategies in Mandela’s No Easy Walk to Freedom. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(1), 192-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.1p.192
Faris, A. A. (2017). Persuasion and political ideologies in the discourse of Nelson Mandela [Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia]. UPM eTheses.
Farooque, U. (2021). Critical Approach. Lulu Publication.
Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2018). Persuasion: Social influence and compliance gaining (6th ed.). Routledge Traylor & Francis group.
Hyland, K. (2004). A convincing argument: Corpus analysis and academic persuasion. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp. 87-112). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.05hyl
International Labour Organisation. (2003). Guidelines concerning a statistical definition of informal employment, Seventeenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians (Geneva). http://ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_087622.pdf
Johnstone, B. (1989). Linguistics strategies and cultural styles for persuasive discourse. Language, Communication, and Culture: Current Directions, 139-156. Texas: Texas University Press.
Lakoff, R. (1974). Remarks on “this” and “that.” Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 345–356). University of Chicago.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Mulholland, J. (2015). A handbook of persuasive tactics: A practical language guide. Routledge.
Okonjo-Iweala, N. (2021). 2021 WTO international Women’s Day: “Women in leadership: Achieving an equal future in a COVID-19 world” [Speech transcript]. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/spno_e/spno2_e.htm
Partington, A. (2003). The linguistics of political argument: The Spin-Doctor and the Wolf-Pack at the White House (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203218259
Pennycook, A. (1994). The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal, 48(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.2.173
Putri, R. A., & Panjaitan, Y. A. (2021). Persuasive strategies in Michelle Obama's speech at the "Hillary for America" campaign event in Manchester, New Hampshire. In Nazarudin & A. T. P. G. van Engelenhoven (Eds.), On language, education, politics, and identity: A cross-linguistics perspective (pp. 377-390). Nova Science Publishers, Inc..
Ruzibaeva, N. (2019). Peculiarities of the antithesis in the literary text. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 7(11), 149-152.
Sharif, A., & Abdullah, F. S. (2014). Persuasive discourse in ceremonial speeches of Mother Teresa: A critical review. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 319-332.
Tanko, A. M., Ismail, M. Z., Jabar, M. A. A., & Mustapha, N. F. (2021). Persuasive strategies in Buhari’s maiden coup speech. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6), 1728–1745. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10076
Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Zheng, T. (2000). Characteristics of Australian political language rhetoric: Tactics of gaining public support and shirking responsibility. Journal of Intercultural Communication, (4).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2302-03
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021