A Corpus-driven Study on the Use of Passive Verb Bundles in Academic Writing: A Comparison between L1 and L2 English Speakers
Abstract
Lexical bundles studies are still limited in relation to the use of verb phrase-based bundles, specifically the passive forms in academic writing. This study reveals the lexico-grammatical patterns and functional categories of passive verb bundles in the 409,373-word Malaysian Polytechnics Electronic Engineering Learner Corpus (MyPolyEELC) in comparison to the British Academic Written English (BAWE) 29,530-word sub-corpus. The Sketch Engine lexical computing tool is used to analyse both the L2 Malaysian and L1 English learner writing. Biber et al.’s (1999) structural categories framework is employed to identify the verb-phrase bundles and further locate the passive forms, whereas the functional categories are identified through Hyland’s (2008a) framework. Francis et al.’s (1996) verb pattern analysis is used to identify the lexico-grammatical patterns and meaning groups of the passive verb bundles. The analyses indicate several passive verb structural categories in both learner corpora. The L2 learners disclose limited participant-oriented functions in the passive verb bundles’ use, which is contrary to the L1 English learners who display profound use of participant-oriented ‘engagement’ and ‘stance’ categories through several choices of lexical verbs. The findings also show the inter-relation between the meaning group, lexico-grammatical pattern and functional category. The inter-relationship illustrates that the meaning group which motivates the lexico-grammatical pattern or vice versa, further contributes to identification of the functional category of the bundles based on a larger context of the text. The variations discovered between the L2 and L1 learner writing may offer several corpus-related pedagogical practices to be applied in an EAP classroom.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adel, A., & Erman, B. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004
Ang, L. H., Tan, K. H., & Lye, G. Y. (2020). Error types in Malaysian lower secondary school student writing: A corpus-informed analysis of subject-verb agreement and copula be. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 26(4), 127-140.
Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written register. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre and style. (2nd ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at ….. Lexical bundles in University teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.
Biber, D., & Grey, B. (2013). Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL Ibt test: A lexico-grammatical analysis. TOEFL Ibt -19 Research Report. ETS. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02311.x
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30-49.
Durrant, P. (2017). Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv011
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics 1934-1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Francis, G. (1993). A corpus-driven approach to grammar: Principles, methods and examples. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 137–56). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E. (1996). Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.
Granger, S. (2013). The passive in learner English: Corpus insights and implications for pedagogical grammar. In S. Ishikawa (Ed.), Learner corpus studies in Asia and the world, 1, 5-15. Papers from LCSAW2013. Kobe: School of Languages and Communication, Kobe University.
Green, C. (2019). Enriching the academic wordlist and Secondary Vocabulary Lists with lexicogrammar: Toward a pattern grammar of academic vocabulary. System, 87, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102158
Gries, S. T. (2008). Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey. In Granger, S., & Meunier, F. (Eds.) Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 3-25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hinkel, E. (2002). Why English passive is difficult to teach (and learn). In Hinkel, E., & Fotos. S. (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching (pp. 233-260). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Bonelli, E. T. (ed). The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hussain, G., Zahra, T., & Abbas, A. (2021). Discourse functions of lexical bundles in Pakistani Chemistry and Physics books. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(1), 221-238.
Hyland, K. (2008a). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
Hyland, K. (2008b). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 4-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., et al. (2014). The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography ASIALEX, 1, 7-36. DOI 10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9.
Lee, Y. E., Yoo, I. W., Shin, Y. K. (2020). The use of English prepositions in lexical bundles in essays written by Korean university students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100848
Liardet, C.L., & Black, S. (2019). “So and so” says, states and argues: A corpus-assisted engagement analysis of reporting verbs. Journal of Second Language Writing. 44, 37-50.
Lim, J. M. H. (2017). Writing descriptions of experimental procedures in language education: Implications for the teaching of English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 47, 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.05.001
McEnery, T., Brezina, V., Gablasova, D., & Banerjee, J. (2019). Corpus Linguistics, Learner Corpora, and SLA: Employing technology to analyze language use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190519000096
Mudraya, O. (2006). Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for
Specific Purposes, 25(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002.
Otto, P. (2021). Choosing specialized vocabulary to teach with data-driven learning: An example from civil engineering. English for Specific Purposes. 61, 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.08.003
Pan, F., & Liu, C. (2019). Comparing L1-L2 differences in lexical bundles in student and expert writing. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 37(2), 142-157.
Pan, F., Reppen, R., & Biber, D. (2016). Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.003
Qian, M., & Ma, H. (2020). The creation and evaluation of a grammar pattern list for the most frequent academic verbs. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.01.002
Quirk, G., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. USA: Longman.
Rayson, P. (2006). Log-likelihood calculator [Computer software]. Lancaster University. Available from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html
Rezoug, F., & Vincent, B. (2018). Exploring lexical bundles in the Algerian Corpus of Engineering. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 47–77.
Roslina Abdul Aziz. (2018). A corpus-based study of the use of “BE” in Malay ESL learner essays. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Universiti Malaya.
Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of keywords – and key key words. System, 25(2), 233-245.
Sinclair, J. (1996) The search for units of meaning. Textus, 9(1), 75–106.
Sinclair, J. (2005). Corpus and Text – Basic Principles. In Wynne, M. (Ed.), Developing linguistic corpora: A guide to good practice (pp. 1–16). Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Sinclair, J. (2009). The phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the phrase. In Granger, S., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 407-410). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Siti Aeisha Joharry. (2016). Malaysian learners’ argumentative writing in English: A contrastive, corpus-driven study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.
Staples, S., & Reppen, R. (2016). Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.02.002
Stubbs, M. (2009). Technology and phraseology: With notes on the history of corpus linguistics. In Romer, U & Schulze, R. (Eds.), Exploring the lexis-grammar interface (pp.15-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Teh, H. B. L., Zuraida Yaacob, Aziam Mustafa & Mohd Hasni Angterian. (2016). Writing format. In Siti Noridah Ali & Alinawate Ali. (Eds.), Diploma students’ project guide (pp. 28-78). Putrajaya: Instructional and Digital Learning Unit, Department of Polytechnic and Community College Education.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2104-04
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021