Critical Literacy Practices of English Major in a Tertiary Institution
Abstract
Being able to read texts critically is a much sought after skill in today’s globalised work environments. However, it is increasingly being reported that many tertiary students in Malaysia find this skill difficult to acquire. Students need to learn how to analyse a wide range of reading texts as it is seen as a response to the social construction of one’s peers, culture, family, classrooms, neighbours, communities and world (Lesley, 2004). Responding to local concerns about the lack of attention accorded to the development of tertiary students’ critical literacy practices, this paper examines the challenges faced by 25 students majoring in English in an undergraduate programme in trying to comprehend an opinion-based text. The findings show that many students still experience the following reading difficulties: understanding the author’s message, distinguishing fact from opinion, understanding main ideas, guessing meaning from context and making inferences. The paper suggests that teachers can actively incorporate critical literacy theories into their classroom practice as it can generate more meaningful learning experiences among their learners as it encourages students to use their voices and life experiences as valid sources of knowledge (Hass-Dyson, 2001). Teaching instruction on developing readers to be more critical should be included in the pedagogical practices of undergraduate programme given that such instruction can hone students’ critical literacy practices in the higher education sector.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allington, R. L. (2000). What Really Matters for Struggling Readers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Anstey, A. & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and Learning Multiliteracies: Changing Times, Changing Literacies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Behrman, H.E. (2006). Teaching about language, power and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy. Vol. 49 (6), 490-498.
Comber, B. & Simpson. A. (2001). Negotiating Critical Literacies in the Classroom. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Freire, P. (1995). Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Gallagher, K. (2004). Deeper Reading: Comprehending Challenging Texts. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Gee, J.P. (2004). Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. New York: Routledge.
Giroux, H. (1993). Literacy and the politics of difference. In C. Lankshear & P. McLaren (Eds.). Critical literacy: Politics, praxis and the postmodern (pp. 367-377). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Goodwyn, A. & Stables, A. (2004). Learning to Read Critically in Language and Literacy. New York: Sage Publications.
Haas-Dyson, A. (2001). Relational sense and textual sense in a US urban classroom: The contested case of Emily, girl friend of a ninja. In B.Comber & A. Simpson (Eds.). Negotiating critical literacies in classrooms (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kaur, S., Ganapathy, M. & Sidhu, G.K. (2012). Designing learning elements using the multiliteracies approach in an ESL writing classroom. 3L Language, Linguistics, Literature: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 18(3), 119-134.
Koo, Y.L. (2008). Language, Culture and Literacy: Meaning-making in Global Contexts. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Koo, Y.L., Wong, F.F. & Kemboja Ismail. (2012). Students’ critical consciousness through critical literacy awareness. Gema Online® Journal of Language Studies, Vol. 12, No.1, 727-143.
Lankshear, C. & McLaren, P. (1993). Critical Literacy: Politics, Praxis and the Postmodern. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lee S.K., Lee, K.S., Wong, F.F. & Azizah Ya’acob. (2010). The English Language and its impact on identities of multilingual Malaysian undergraduates. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 10(1), 87-101.
Lesley, M. (2004). Looking for critical literacy with postbaccalaureate content area literacy students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. Vol. 48(4), 320-334.
Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy. Vol. 43, 448-461.
McLaughlin, M. & Allen, M.B. (2002). From Guided Comprehension: A Teaching odel for Grades 3–8. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
McLaughlin, M. & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical literacy as comprehensions: Expanding reader response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. Vol. 48, 52-56.
Nambiar, R. M. K. (2007) Enhancing academic literacy among tertiary learners: A Malaysian experience. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 13, 77-94.
Normazidah Che Musa, Koo, Y.L. & Hazita Azman. (2012). Exploring English Language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 12(1), 35-51.
Pescatore, C. (2007). High school students’ instructional preferences when reading literary works of art. The Reading Matrix. Vol. 4(2), 97-118.
Pramela Krish, Hafizah Latif & Zalina Mohd Lazim. (2012). Editorial: Interdisciplinary perspectives on culture, power and values: Language and literary studies in the local-global context. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies (Special Edition). Vol. 12(2), 339-341.
Rosenblatt, L.M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R.B. Ruddel & N.J. Unrau (Eds.),Theoretical models and processes of reading 5th ed (pp. 1363-1398). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Serafini, F. (2003). Informing our practice: Modernist, transactional, and critical perspectives on children’s literature and reading instruction. Reading Online. Vol. 6(6). Retrieved June 6, 2012 from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=serafini/index.html
West, M. (2007). “Fruits of the Poetry of Discovery”. The Australian, 7 July 2010.
Zaira Abu Hasan. (2008). Peer interaction and meaning construction among ESL learners in comprehending texts in 2nd language context. Unpublished Ph.D thesis. Faculty of Modern Languages, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021