Legitimation Analysis: Exploring Decision-Making and Power in Hot Bench

Mohd Muzhafar Idrus, Nor Fariza Mohd Nor

Abstract


Research in discourse analysis has demonstrated that power can be illuminated through analyzing discourses. Centered on the notion that power and legitimation go hand-in-hand, these discourses are distinguished by specific linguistic components.  One of the ways to explore how legitimation is tranquilized is to scrutinize its discourses, which some scholars (Wang, 2006; Van Leeuwen, 2007) argue have the precedence to control some of everyday, social, and public spheres. Following this premise, this paper examines how legitimation is jostled in selected decision-making scenes in a popular syndicated three-judge panel TV court show, Hot Bench. Two objectives are set out for this study; firstly to examine how organization and resolution of cases are generally settled and secondly to identify the types of legitimation employed by the judges in their decision-making processes.  Premiered in 2014, Hot Bench draws over 2 million viewers in October 2014, jumping to a staggering 2.5 million viewers in November 2014, emerging as one of the most watched syndicated legal reality TV programs in United States of America with its second season renewed through 2017. By analyzing selected conversations by judges who deliberate verdicts, this study which employs Van Leeuwen’s framework of legitimation concludes that the judges typically employ three types of legitimation, namely, authorization, moral evaluation, and rationalization over the course of adjudicating TV’s court proceedings. This study ultimately contributes to the broader field of discourse analysis by tapping onto the belief that language, through discourse analysis, serves as a vehicle within which specific discourse community maintains power. 

 

DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1602-03


Keywords


courtroom discourse; discourse analysis; legitimation; power; Hot Bench

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abduljalil Nasr Hazaea, Noraini Ibrahim & Nor Fariza Mohd Nor. (2014). Discursive Legitimation of Human Values: Local-Global Power Relations in Global Media Discourse. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 14(1), 171-187.

Atkinson, J. M. & Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

Aula, H. & Tienari, J. (2011). Becoming “World-Class?” Reputation-Building in a University Merger. Critical Perspectives on International

Business. 7(1), 7-29.

Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, Codes, and Control, Volume III: Towards a Theory of Educational Transmissions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bibel, S. (2014). Syndicated ‘Hot Bench’ Renewed for Season 2 by CBS Television Distribution. Retrieved January 1, 2015 from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/12/11/syndicated-hot-bench-renewed-for-season-2-by-cbs-television-distribution/338565/.

Bitekhtine, A. (2011). Towards a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status. Academy of Management Review. 36, 151-179.

Bogoch, B. (2000). Discourse Dilemmas and Courtroom Control: The Talk of Trial Judges. Law & Social Inquiry. 25(1), 227-247.

Brown, G., & Yule, B. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Casey, P., Burke, K., & Leben, S. (2013). Minding the court: Enhancing the decision-making process. International Journal for Court Administration. 5(1), 1-10.

Cayton, A. R. L., Sisson, R. & Zacher, C. (2015). The Midwest: An interpretation. Humanities Institute: Ohio State University. Retrieved November 30, 2015 from https://huminst.osu.edu/i-midwest-interpretation.

Chen, J. (2011). The Reconstruction of Prosecution-Defence-Judge Relationship in China: A Frame Analysis of Judges’ Discourse Information Processing. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law. 18(2), 309-313.doi:10.1558/ijsll.v18i2.309.

Cornell University. (2015). Cornell Climate Change. Retrieved February 12, 2015 from http://climatechange.cornell.edu/what-is-a-polar-vortex/ Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Davies, H. (2014). Judge Judy Net Worth. The Daily Drift. Retrieved January 27, 2015 from http://www.thedailydrifts.com/judge-judy-net-worth/.

Dunmire, P. L. (2009). ‘9/11 Changed Everything:’ An Intertextual Analysis of the Bush Doctrine. Discourse and Society. 20(2), 195-222.

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Van Dijk, T. (Ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 258-285). London: Sage.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

Hock Lai, H. (2015). The Legal Concept of Evidence. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved March 17, 2015 from http://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=evidence-legal

Holmes, J. (2000). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Wellington: Longman.

Hot Bench. (2014a). Retrieved November 7, 2014 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGb05uYE9b4

Hot Bench. (2014b). Retrieved November 7, 2014 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTWW9VbcT-0.

Hot Bench. (2014c). Retrieved November 7, 2014 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=macvczs0v3m

Hot Bench. (2014d). Retrieved November 7, 2014 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4nkE-c-boE

Hot Bench. (2015). Retrieved January 5, 2015 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMj7wQXvqmc

Inside Edition. (2014). Hot Bench. Retrieved January 26, 2015 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0eRzRZE8gY.

Lefsrud, L. M. & Meyer, R. E. (2012). Science or Science Fiction? Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change. Organization Studies. 33, 1477-1506.

Liebermann, M. D. (2003). Reflective and Reflexive Judgement Processes: A Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Approach. In Forgas, J. P., Williams, K. R., & von Hippel, W. (Eds.). Social Judgments: Implicit and Explicit Processes (pp. 44-67). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lirola, M. M. (2014). Legitimating the Return of Immigrants in Spanish Media Discourse. Brno Studies in English. 40(1), 129-147.

Machin, D. & Mayr, A. (2012). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.

Matoesian, G. M. (2001). Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Meyer, R., HÖllerer, M., Jancsary, D., & van Leeuwen, T. (2013). The Visual Dimension in Organizing, Organization, and Organization Research: Core Ideas, Current Developments, and Promising Avenues. Academy of Management Annals. 8, 1-56.

Mueller, C. (1973). The Politics of Communication: A Study in the Political Sociology of Language, Socidization and Legitimation. New York: Oxford University Press.

New York Courts. (2015). Circumstantial evidence-entire case. New York Courts. Retrieved from https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/1-General/CJI2d.Circumstantial_Evidence.pdfNoodls. (2015). Hot Bench. Retrieved January 26, 2015 from

http://article.wn.com/view/2014/12/12/cbs_television_distribution_renews_queen_bee_productions_hot/.

Nor Fariza Mohd Nor & Jamaluddin Aziz. (2010). Discourse Analysis of Decision Making Episodes in Meetings: Politeness Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature®, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 16(2), 66-92.

Oddo, R. (2011). War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses. Discourse and Society. 22(3), 287-314.

Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of Legitimation in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions. Discourse and Society. 22(6), 781-807.

Riaz, S., Buchanan, S., & Bapuji, H. (2011). Institutional Work Amidst the Financial Crisis: Emerging Positions of Elite Actors. Organization. 18, 187-214.

Sadeghi, B. & Jalali, V. (2013). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Discursive (de-) Legitimation Construction of Egyptian Revolution in Persian Media. Journal of Teaching and Research. 4(5), 1063-1071.

Scherer, K. & Giles, H. (1979). Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.

Sefer, B. K. (2010). Juvenile Courtroom Interactions: Verbal and Bodily Performances as an Object of Exchange with the Judges. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences. 5(2), 201-220.

Simpson-Wood, T. (2015). The rise and fall of Bad Judge: Lady Justice is no tramp. Texas Journal of Entertainment & Sports Law. 1-52.

Tannen, D. (1993). What’s in a Frame Surface: Evidence for Underlying Expectations. In Tannen, D. (Ed.). Framing in Discourse (pp. 14-56). New York: Oxford University Press.

Tost, L. P. (2011). An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgments. Academy of Management Review. 36, 686-710.

Vaara, E. & Monin, P. (2010). A Recursive Perspective on Discursive Legitimation and Organizational Action in Mergers and Acquisitions. Organization Science. 21(1), 3-22.

Vaara, E. (2014). Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and Their Ideological Underpinnings. Discourse and Society. 25(4), 500-518.

Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2011). On the narrative construction of multinational corporations: An antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger. Organization Science. 22(2), 370- 390.

Van Der Houwen, F. & Sneijder, P. (2014). From text to talk in criminal court: Prosecuting, Defending, and Examining the Evidence. Language & Communication. 36, 37-52.

Van Der Houwen, F. (2005). Negotiating disputes and achieving judgments on Judge Judy. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Southern California, California, United States of America.

Van Der Houwen, F. (2015). “If It Doesn’t Make Sense It’s Not True:” How Judge Judy Creates Coherent Stories through “Common-Sense” Reasoning According to the Neoliberal Agenda. Social Semiotics. 25, 25-50.

Van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave & Macmillan.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in Discourse and Communication. Discourse and Communication. 1(1), 91-112.

Walton, D. (2016). Evidence and argument evaluation. In Walton, D. (Ed.). Argument evaluation and evidence (pp. 243-278). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Wang, J. (2006). Questions and the Exercise of Power. Discourse and Society. 17(4), 529-548.

Zelditch, M. (2001). Processes of Legitimation: Recent Developments and New Directions. Social Psychology Quarterly. 64, 4-17.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021