Understanding Online Communicative Language Features In Social Networking Environment

Siti Hamin Stapa, Azianura Hani Shaari

Abstract


This paper discusses the findings of a research study that seeks to investigate the language features and patterns of online communicative language amongst young Malaysian Facebook users. The acquisition of online literacy might create a gap or linguistic disparity that distinguish the young online users from the older generations who are not used to online communication environment hence, it is due to the same concern that led to the departure of this study. With the corpus of over 500,000 words of Online Communicative Language derived from a one year of Facebook conversations among 120 young Malaysians from different ethnic groups, mother tongues, and cultural background, it is hoped that the study will shed light into the new patterns of Online Communicative Language among young Malaysians that somehow signifies a reconstruction of an online identity among the young users; regardless of their cultural differences and backgrounds.   Virtual Ethnography was employed, which involved daily observations and documentations of actual conversations on Facebook in a period of 12 months. Data were analyzed using Content Analysis in examining the features and patterns employed by the participants. The findings of the study suggest that the features used by these online users are spelling innovations and modifications, combinations of letter and number homophone, reduction or omission of vowels, replacement of <s> with <z>, the use of one letter to represent a word, the use of playful jargons, the used of acronyms and abbreviations and the use of emoticons.   As a conclusion, language evolution is seen as an ongoing process and the development of online communicative language is always unpredictable even though it might originated from a re-thinking process of some old spelling conventions in media and not language that derived on its own.


Keywords


online communicative language; social networking environment; Facebook; online literacy; online conversations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baron, S. N. (2005). Instant Messaging by American College Students: A case study in computer-mediated communication. Paper Presented in “Language on the Internet: American Association for the Advancement of Science and Annual Meeting, February 17-21, 2005”.

Baron, S. N. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. New York: Oxford University Press.

Baron, S. N. (2009). The Myth of impoverished signal: Dispelling the Spoken-Language Fallacy for emoticons in Online Communication. (Online) Retrieved 22 November 2009, from http://www1.american.edu/tesol/Baron-AAIM%20by%20American%20College%20Students.pdf

Berman, I. (2006). Email-“Inspired” changes in non-native legal discourse. Digital Peer Publishing.urn:nbn:de:0009-7-3726. (Online) Retrieved 10 January 2010, from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2006/372

Brown, P & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N Goddy (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet. (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Derks, D., E.R. Bos, A., & Von Grumbkow, J. (2008). Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication: Social Motives and Social Context. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(1).

Derks, D., E.R. Bos, A., & Von Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review 2008, 26:379 (Originally published online 10 December 2007). (Online) Retrieved 10 May 2011, from http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/26/3/379

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

Gao, L. (2001). Digital age, digital English. English Today 67, 17(3), July 2001. 2001 Cambridge University Press.

Greenfield, M. P. & Subrahmanyam, K. (2003). Online discourse in teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in visual medium. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 713-738.

Johnova, M. (2004). The Language of chat. An Online Journal of Modern Philology. ISSN 1214-5505. (Online) Retrieved 28 December 2009, from http://philologica.net/studia/20040113000003.htm

Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Lewin, B., & Donner, J. (2002). Communication in Internet Message boards: A quantitative analysis of usage in Computer-Mediated Conversation (CMC). English Today, 18(3), 71-98.

Lotherington, H., and Xu, Y. (2004). How to chat in English and Chinese: Emerging digital language conventions. ReCALL, 16(2), 8-329.

Maynor, N. (1994). ‘The language of electronic mail: Written speech?’ In G. D. Little & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Centennial usage studies (pp. 48-54). Tuscaloosa: Alabama UP.

Norizah Hassan & Azirah Hashim. (2009). Electronic English in Malaysia: Features and language in use. English Today 100, 25(4).

Uhlirova, L. (1994). E-mail as a New Sub variety of Medium and its Effects upon the Message. In S. Mejrkova & P. Frantidek (Eds.), The syntax of sentence and text: A festschrift for Frantidek Danes (pp. 273-282). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Ross, N. (2006). Writing in the information age. English Today, 22(3), 87-115.

Shortis, T. (2007). Revoicing txt: Spelling, vernacular orthography and ‘unregimented writing’. In Santiago Posteguillo, María José Esteve, & M. Lluïsa Gea-Valor (Eds.), The texture of internet: Netlinguistics in progress (pp. 2-23). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.

Shortis, T. (2007). The Texture of Internet: Netlinguistics in Progress. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. (Online) Retrieved 10 May 2011, from http://www.c-s-p.org/Flyers/9781847181732-sample.pdf

Squires, L. (2010). Enregistering internet language. Language in Society, 39, 457-492.

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Denis, Derek. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83, 3-34.

Yates, S. J. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing: A corpus based study. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 29-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Yates, S. J. (2000). Computer-mediated communication, the future of the letter? In D. Barton & N. Hall (Eds.), Letter writing as a social practice (pp. 233-251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Zaini Amir, Hazirah Abidin, Saadiyah Darus, & Kemboja Ismail. (2012). Gender differences in the language use of Malaysian teen bloggers. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 105-124.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021