Bridging the Gap between Malaysian Employment Law and ILO Standards on Gig Workers' Rights

Kamal Halili Hassan, Nazruzila Razniza Binti Mohd Nadzri

Abstract


The rapid rise of the gig economy has created new challenges in ensuring legal protection for workers. Classifying gig workers as independent contractors often excludes them from traditional employment law protections, especially in jurisdictions like Malaysia, where the laws primarily focus on employees with formal contracts. This research aims to investigate the influence of the International Labour Organization (ILO) standards on gig workers’ rights and to assess how Malaysian employment law aligns with the ILO standards. Although the ILO has not created specific conventions for gig workers, its general labour standards can still be applied to safeguard their rights. For example, the ILO’s Decent Work Declaration offers protections such as fair wages, occupational safety, and social security that can benefit gig workers. This study adopts a qualitative approach, analyzing both legal and non-legal sources. It includes a comprehensive review of ILO instruments, Malaysian employment law, and relevant journal articles and reports, to identify similarities and discrepancies between the legal frameworks. The analysis focuses on the ILO's impact on gig worker protections. This research evaluates the effectiveness of Malaysian law in ensuring protections such as minimum wages, social security, and dispute resolution mechanisms for gig workers, based on their legal status. This study adds to the continuing discussion about the gig economy by fusing state laws with global norms.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, N. ., Ismail, M. M., Murad, M. S. H., Jusoff, K. ., Kurniawan, F. ., & Salah, M. . 2024. Critical Insights into Gig Economy: A Peninsular Malaysia Case Study. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(1), 11 –. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i1.5494

Abdul Rahim, A.F.,Yaacob, N.A., Mohd Noor, R., Najid, N.A. & Zulkifli, N. 2021 Strengthening the gig economy: Future of digital labor workforce platform post-covid-19 2021. Strengthening the gig economy: Future of digital labor workforce platform post-covid 19. Gading Journal for Social Sciences, 24 (4), 17-26.

Abu Seman, A.S., Hassan, K.H. 2024. Analisis Akta Keselematan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan (Pindaan) 2022. Perbandingan Sebelum dan Selepas Pindaan serta Implikasinya terhadap Industri. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat (JUUM), 34(2): 122-140.

Aloisi, A. & De Stefano, V. 2020. Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator, International Labour Review, 159 (1), 47-69.

Anbalagan, V. 2023, November 27. E-hailing drivers not employees, court reaffirms. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2023/11/27/court-of-appeal-affirms-that-e-hailing-drivers-are-not-employees/

Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd & Uber BV [2020] The NZEmpC 230 (New Zealand)

Busby, N., McDermont, M. 2020. Fighting with the Wind: Claimants’ Experiences and Perceptions of the Employment Tribunal. Industrial Law Journal, 49 (2), 159-198.

Countouris, N. 2016. The Changing Law of the Employment Relationship: Comparative Analyses in the European Context (e-book). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315614472.

De Stefano, V., 2021. Not as simple as it seems: The ILO and the personal scope of international labour standards. International Labour Review, 160(3), 387–406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12201

De Stefano, V., Durri, I., Stylogiannis, C & Mathias, W., 2021, Platform work and the employment relationship, ILO Working Papers, International

Labour Organization

Employment Act 1955 (Act 265)

Employment Insurance System Act 2017 (Act 800)

Employees Provident Fund Act 1991 (Act 452)

Employees’ Social Security Act 1969 (Act 4)

Fischer, A. (2024). The Future of Employment Law in the Gig Economy: Legal Protections for Digital Workers. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 3(4), 18-26

Goh, E. (2019, December 18). Gig Work: Side Hustle or Main Job? Part 1: The reality of hours worked in the gig work. The Centre. https://www.centre.my/post/gig-work-main-job-or-sidehustle>

Hassan, K.H., Rahman, R.A. & Ismail, M. 2024. Legal Aspects of Industrial Safety in Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Heeks, R., Graham, M., Mungai, P., Van Belle, J. & Woodcock, J. 2021. Systematic evaluation of gig work against decent work standards: The development and application of the Fairwork framework. The Information Society, 37:5, 267-286, DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2021.1942356

Hießl, C. 202). The legal status of platform workers: regulatory approaches and prospects of a European solution. Italian Labour Law E-Journal, 15(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/15210

Hoh Kiang Ngan v Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor [1996] 4 CLJ 687

ILO Global Commission on the future of work. (2019). Work for a brighter future, Geneva, ILO.

ILO Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87).

ILO Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98).

ILO Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100).

ILO Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111).

ILO Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95).

ILO Employment Relationship Recommendation 2006 (No. 198).

ILO Minimum Wage Fixing Recommendation, 1970 (No. 135).

ILO Minimum Wage Fixing Convention, 1970 (No. 131).

ILO Invalidity, Old-Age and Survivors' Benefits Convention, 1967 (No. 128).

ILO Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102).

ILO Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Convention, 1988 (No. 168).

ILO Invalidity, Old-Age and Survivors' Benefits Recommendation, 1967 (No. 131).

ILO Termination of Employment Convention 1982 (No. 158).

ILO Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy Recommendation, 2015 (No. 204).

Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177).

Institut Maklumat dan Analisis Pasaran Buruh (ILMIA). (2022). Kajian Mengenai Isu Perundangan Perburuhan, Perhubungan Perusahaan Dan Perlindungan Sosial. ILMIA, Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia https://www.ilmia.gov.my/index.php/en/component/zoo/item/article-kajian-gig-2022

International Labour Conference. (1999, June 8). Report of the Director General: Decent Work. International Labour Organization, http://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc87/repi.htm#Major%20social%20protection%20issues

Jabatan Tenaga Kerja Semenanjung Malaysia. (2021, November 21).

Pelan Strategik Jabatan Tenaga Kerja Semenanjung Malaysia (JTKSM) 2021-2025, https://jtksm.mohr.gov.my/ms/sumber-sumber/penerbitan/pelan-strategik-jtksm

Katiyatiya, L.M., & Lubisi, N. 2025. The current social protection discourse, gig economy within the advent of COVID-19: some emerging legal arguments. Labor History, 66:1, 64-76, DOI: 10.1080/0023656X.2024.2340610

Lai, A. 2025, February 20. New Law to cover gig workers. The Star.

Liukkunen, U. 2021. The ILO and Transformation of Labour Law. In

International Labour Organization and Global Social Governance (pp. 17–49). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55400- 2_2 Cloete, F., & Meyer, I. (1994). Policy agenda setting: The title must be in italic. Van Schaik Publishers.

Loh Guet Ching v Minister of Human Resources & Anor [2022] 1 LNS 2388

Ministry of Human Resources. 2024, July 4. Mesyuarat Jawatankuasa High Level Committee (HLC) Penubuhan Suruhanjaya Ekonomi Gig Malaysia Bil. 1/2024, https://www.mohr.gov.my/images/pdf/KENYATAAN%20MEDIA%204.7.2024%20MESYUARAT%20JAWATANKUASA%20HIGH%20LEVEL%20COMMITTEE%20(HLC)%20PENUBUHAN%20SURUHANJAYA%20EKONOMI%20GIG%20MALAYSIA.pdf

Ministry of Finance. 2024, October 18. Belanjawan 2025, https://belanjawan.mof.gov.my/pdf/belanjawan2025/ucapan/ub25.pdf

Minimum Wage Order 2024 (P.U.(A) 376/2024)

Mohd Nadzri, N. R., & Nordin. R. 2023. Hak-hak Pekerja Atipikal di Malaysia. Penerbit UKM.

MyDigital Corporation & Ipsos. (2024, May). What gig workers want: Understanding gig workers’ work and welfare preferences in Malaysia. https://www.mydigital.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GigWorkerWhitepaper.pdf

National Wages Consultative Council Act 2011 (Act 732)

Novitz, T. 2020. The Potential for International Regulation of Gig Economy Issues. King's Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1789442

Peetz, D. 2023. Can and how should the gig worker loophole be closed? The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 34(4), 840-854. https://doi.org/10.1017/elr.2023.57

Radzi, M. S. N. M., Bidin, A., Musa, M. K., & Hamid, N. A. 2022. Protecting gig workers' interests in Malaysia through registered association under the Societies Act 1966. IIUMLJ, 30, 157.

Sabah Labour Ordinance

Sarawak Labour Ordinances

Self-Employment Social Security Act 2017 (Act 789)

Servais, J-M. 2011. International Labour Law. 3rd ed. Wolters Kluwer.

Stanford, J. 2017. The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 382-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617724303

Uber BV v Aslam [2021 UKSC 5 (United Kingdom

Uchiyama, Y., Furuoka, F. and Md. Akhir, M.N. 2022. Gig workers, social protection and labor market inequality: Lessons from Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 56(3), 165-184.

Tanel, K & Aleksi. K. 2022, September.. Gig economy workers in the European Union: towards changing their legal classification. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 117-136. DOI: doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2022.131.2.117/en

Tan, D. 2021. A brave new frontier in the dichotomous Indonesian labour law: gig economy, platform paradox and workers without employers. Mimbar Hukum, 33(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v33i1.1956

Trade Unions Act 1959 (Act 262)

Zwettler, C, Straub, C. & Spurk D. 2024, Nov. Kicking off a Gig Work Career: Unfolding a Career Learning Cycle of Gig Workers. J Career Assess, 32(4), 650-677. doi: 10.1177/10690727231212188.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0126-5008

eISSN: 0126-8694