CONCEPTUALISING LANGUAGE ACQUISITION PROCESS IN CLIL CLASSROOM CONTEXT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Abstract
Researchers have highlighted that a critical component of language acquisition is the opportunity to learn in authentic contexts where natural teaching-learning scenarios can occur. Despite this, the Direct Method (DM) and the Grammar Translation Method (GTM) remain the predominant approaches in English schools. This systematic review, however, aimed to delve into the complexities of language acquisition in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms worldwide. Findings from the review reveal that instructional methods and teachers' proficiency play a crucial role in language learning success within CLIL settings. The results showed a strong case for continuing CLIL methods in educational methodology. Similarly, the research suggests that using CLIL allows both the teacher and students to acquire learning in a natural context, including developing cognitive skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amor, M. I., Tinedo-Rodríguez, A. J., & Osuna-Rodríguez, M. (2023). The Interaction between Language Skills and Cross-Cultural Competences in Bilingual Programs. Languages, 1-15.
Bower, K., Cross, R., & Coyle, D. (2020). CLIL in multilingual and English-background contexts: Expanding the potential of content and language integrated pedagogies for mainstream learning. Curriculum integrated language teaching: CLIL in practice, 3-21.
Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523-532.
Cadias, A. (2019). Preparing for the Challenges of a Bilingual Teacher in Teaching English as a Foreign/Second Language. Second Language, 1-10.
Creese, A. (2010). Content-focused classrooms and learning English: How teachers collaborate. Theory Into Practice, 49(2), 99-105.
Dack, T. F., Argudo, J., & Abad, M. A. (2020). The Development of Pragmatic Competence in CLIL Classrooms. MEXTESOL Journal, 44(3), n3, 1-20.
Dalton-Puffer C (2011) Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31, 182–204.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company
De Diezmas, E. N. M. (2016). The impact of CLIL on the acquisition of L2 competences and skills in primary education. International Journal of English Studies, 16(2), 81-101.
Gabillon, Z. (2020). Revisiting CLIL: Background, pedagogy, and theoretical underpinnings. Contextes et didactiques. Revue semestrielle en sciences de l’éducation, (15), 10-35.
Halbach, A. M. (2018). A literacy approach to language teaching: a proposal for FL teaching in CLIL contexts. Pulso, 205-223.
Hidalgo, D. R., & Ortega-Sánchez, D. (2023). CLIL (content and language integrated learning) methodological approach in the bilingual classroom: A systematic review. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 915-934.
Hu, J., & Gao, X. (2021). Understanding subject teachers’ language-related pedagogical practices in content and language integrated learning classrooms. Language awareness, 30(1), 42-61.
Jiang, P., Akhter, S., Azizi, Z., Gheisari, A., & Kumar, T. (2022). Exploring the role of content and language integrated learning approach in developing transversal skills in university students with respect to the mediating role of emotional intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-12.
Küppers, A., & Trautmann, M. (2013). It is not CLIL that is a success-CLIL students are! Some critical remarks on the current CLIL boom. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in Europe. Research perspectives on policy and practice, 285-296.
Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2016). CLIL students' perceptions of their language learning process: delving into self-perceived improvement and instructional preferences. Language Awareness, 25(1-2), 110-126.
Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Exploring teacher scaffolding in a CLIL-framed EFL intensive reading class: A classroom discourse analysis approach. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 333-360.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., ... & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 65-94.
Lo, Y. Y., Lin, A. M., & Liu, Y. (2023). Exploring content and language co-construction in CLIL with semantic waves. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(3), 289-310.
Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418-442.
Luo, W. H., & Chen, Y. C. (2022). Constructing a teaching capability maturity model for content and language integrated learning teachers in Taiwan. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-10.
Mahan, K. R. (2022). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, 50(1), 74-88.
Mahan, K. R., Brevik, L. M., & Ødegaard, M. (2018). Characterizing CLIL teaching: New insights from a lower secondary classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 942-956.
Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual education & content and language integrated learning. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Finlandia: University of Jyväskylä.
Metlí, A., & Akıs, D. (2022). Challenges and Strategies on the Content and Language Integrated Learning Approach (CLIL): A Case Study from the Turkish Context. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 15(1), 109-125.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341.
Pham, P. A., & Unaldi, A. (2022). Cross-curricular collaboration in a CLIL bilingual context: the perceptions and practices of language teachers and content subject teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(8), 2918-2932.
Porc, G., & Bundy, L. (2020). The effectiveness of CLIL for English language learning in Swedish primary schools. Journal of Education Research, 25(2), 134-150.
Puspitasari, E. (2020). Mind mapping in CLIL: How it facilitates students’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 154-169.
Rodrigo, A. Á. V. (2022). CLIL for the teaching of History and English in Secondary Education: how to complete the existing materials. Language value, 15(1), 1-29.
Satayev, M., Barrios, E., Fernandez-Costales, A., Agaidarova, S., Izbassarova, R., & Balta, N. (2022). The Effect of CLIL Combined with Language Instruction on Language Learning and the Role of Individual and Institutional Factors in Students' Perspectives: Empirical Evidence from Kazakhstan. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1-15.
Shah, S. H., Shaikh, P. A., & Khan, S. K. (2022). The Impact of Direct and Traditional Grammar Translation Methods on The Student’s Performance at Secondary Level: An Empirical Evidence from Balochistan. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 1-10.
Somers, T., & Llinares, A. (2021). Students’ motivation for content and language integrated learning and the role of programme intensity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(6), 839-854.
Tachaiyaphum, N., Gurney, L., & Daly, N. (2023). ‘Definitions did not effectively help my students’: Pre-service teachers’ language modification strategies in Thai language-driven CLIL classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 1-20.
Tagnin, L., & Ní Ríordáin, M. (2021). Building science through questions in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 34, 1-14.
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 112-137.
Tough, A. M. (1991). Crucial questions about the future. Boston Way Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
Trent, J. (2010). Teacher identity construction across the curriculum: Promoting cross-curriculum collaboration in English-medium schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(2), 167-183.
Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2022). The integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 36-50.
Zarichna, O., Buchatska, S., Melnyk, L., & Savchuk, T. (2020). Content and language integrated learning in tertiary education: Perspectives on terms of use and integration. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 184-198.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Index