PANDANGAN PELAJAR UNIVERSITI MALAYA DAN PELAJAR UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA BANDUNG TENTANG ISU SOSIAL SEMASA: SATU PERBANDINGAN

Vishalache Balakrishnan

Abstract


Isi sosial remaja global terus menjadi agenda perbincangan dan penyelidikan yang semakin penting. Kertas ini membincangkan isu-isu sosial/moral semasa yang disuarakan oleh pelajar Universiti Malaya (UM) di Fakulti Pendidikan dan pelajar Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Bandung. Dalam menggunakan kaedah participatory action research (PAR), pelajar daripada kedua-dua universiti telah menulis isu sosial/moral yang mereka tahu atau alami dan kemudiannya membincangkan punca terjadinya isu tersebut. Kaedah ini mengaplikasikan perbincangan menggunakan dilemma kehidupan sebenar (Vishalache, 2012).  Tujuan kajian ini dijalankan ialah untuk membuat satu perbandingan di antara isu-isu sosial khasnya dalam kalangan remaja Universiti Malaya (UM) di Malaysia  dan remaja di Universitias Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Bandung. Seramai 15 pelajar UM dan 15 pelajar UPI terlibat dalam kajian ini iaitu termasuk pelajar lelaki dan pelajar perempuan. Responden pelajar UM yang terlibat terdiri daripada pelbagai kaum dan agama. Responden pelajar UPI yang terlibat semuanya adalah Melayu Jawa dan beragama Islam. Di antara isu moral yang diutarakan ialah pergaulaan bebas, seks bebas dan isu kurang sopan dalam kalangan remaja. Mereka mencadangkan ibu bapa diberikan kursus mendidik anak-anak dan sekolah memainkan peranan yang lebih aktif dalam mengatasi isu sosial dalam kalangan remaja.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, H. A. (2005). Education in ideology. Journal of Moral Education, 34(1), 1-18.

Baier, A. (1985). What do women want in a moral theory. In A. Baier (Ed.), Moral prejudices: Essays on ethics (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bull, N. J. (1969). Moral education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Emihovich, C., & Lima, E. S. (1995). The many facets of Vygotsky: A cultural-historical voice from the future. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26(4), 375-383.

Gaventa, J. (1991). Toward a knowledge democracy: Viewpoints on participatory action-research in North America. In Fals-Borda & M. A. Rahman (Eds.), Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research (pp. 121-131). New York: The Apex Press.

Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women's conceptions of the self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 481-517.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity and "ethically important moments" in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-280.

Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Life world and system: A critique of functionist reason. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.

Habermas, J. (1994). The past as future. Interviews by M. Haller (M. Pensky, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity.

Held, V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society and politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. London: Sage.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1998). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Kuumba, B., & Ajanaku, F. (1996). Women's liberation research: Methodological strategies for social change and empowerment. Advances in Gender Research, 1, 189-212.

Morse, J. M., & Richards, L. (2002). Read me first for a user's guide to qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Vishalache, B. & Claiborne, L.B. (2012). Vygotsky from ZPD to ZCD in ME: Reshaping Western theory and practices in local context. Journal of Moral Education, 41 (2), 225-243.

Vishalache, B. & Cornforth, S. (2013). Using working agreements in participatory action research: working through moral problems with Malaysian students. Educational Action Research, 21 (4), 582-602.

Vishalache, B. (2008). Pendidikan moral untuk universiti dan kolej. Subang Jaya: Arah Pendidikan.

Vishalache, B. (2012). Using real-life dilemmas to teach ME. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: University of Malaya Press.

Walker, L. J., Pitts, R. C., Hennig, K. H., & Matsuba, M. K. (1995). Reasoning about morality and real-life moral problems. In M. Killen & D. Hart (Eds.), Morality in everyday life developmental perspectives (pp. 371-407). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wilson, J. (1967). Introduction to moral education. Harmondsworth: Penguin.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Index