Task-Based Language Teaching in Academic English Higher Education: A Case of Low-Proficiency Learners in Thailand

Budi Waluyo, Thinley Wangdi

Abstract


Amid the rising interest in task-based language teaching (TBLT) adoption within higher education, scant attention has been paid to its implications for students with low English proficiency who are enrolled in academic English courses. Therefore, employing a mixed-method research design, this study implemented and assessed the impact of TBLT in an academic English curriculum, with a specific focus on speaking skills, over a 12-week duration. The research involved 205 first-year university students in Thailand, representing diverse academic disciplines (22% male, 78% female). Quantitative data encompassed in-class TBLT participation scores, final speaking test results, and course grades, while qualitative insights were drawn from reflective essays. The quantitative data underwent both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis, whereas thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data. The quantitative analysis disclosed noteworthy outcomes: 1) a moderate level of engagement among low-proficiency participants; 2) a robust correlation between classroom engagement, communicative proficiency, and academic performance, with engagement emerging as a significant predictor; and 3) superior progress among highly and moderately engaged students compared to their less-engaged peers. Qualitative analysis unveiled four pivotal themes, aligning with prevailing language acquisition theories, highlighting the pivotal role of speaking exercises in enhancing fluency and self-assurance, promoting active learner involvement, fostering an enriching learning environment, and enhancing language applicability to real-world contexts. In summation, these findings advocate for augmented incorporation of speaking exercises in language pedagogy, emphasising the interconnected dimensions of linguistic, cognitive, emotional, and social facets within the language learning journey.

 

Keywords꞉ Classroom participation; communicative competence; course achievement; task-based language teaching; low-proficiency students


Full Text:

PDF

References


Albino, G. (2017). Improving speaking fluency in a task-based language teaching approach: The case of EFL learners at PUNIV-Cazenga. Sage Open, 7, 1-11. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244017691077

Al-Gahtani, S., & Roever, C. (2013). ‘Hi doctor, give me handouts’: low-proficiency learners and requests. ELT Journal, 67, 413-424. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct036

Andy-Wali, H. A., & Wali, A. F. (2018). Lecturers’ leadership practices and their impact on students’ experiences of participation with implications for marketing higher education services. Higher Education for the Future, 5(1), 40-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631117738640

Anwar, K., & Arifani, Y. (2016). Task based language teaching: Development of CALL. International Education Studies, 9, 168-183. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103521

Bao, R., & Du, X. (2015). Implementation of task-based language teaching in Chinese as a foreign language: Benefits and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28, 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2015.1058392

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 347–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.017

Bean, J. C., & Peterson, D. (1998). Grading classroom participation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1998(74), 33-40. https://cetl.westernu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/GradingParticipationBeanPeterson.pdf

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(13), 1-10. https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/alternative-approaches-to-assessing-student-engagement-rates

Chen, J. C. (2016). The crossroads of English language learners, task-based instruction, and 3D multi-user virtual learning in Second Life. Computers & Education, 102, 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.08.004

Day, R. R. (1984). Student participation in the ESL classroom or some imperfections in practice. Language Learning, 34, 69-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00342.x

Delaney, T. (2012). Quality and quantity of oral participation and English proficiency gains. Language Teaching Research, 16, 467-482.

Delfino, A. P. (2019). Student engagement and academic performance of students of Partido State University. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812455586

Douglas, S. R., & Kim, M. (2015). Task-based language teaching and English for academic purposes: An investigation into instructor perceptions and practice in the Canadian context. TESL Canada Journal, 31, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v31i0.1184

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford university press.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x

Galaczi, E. D. (2014). Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests?. Applied Linguistics, 35, 553-574. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017

Galyon, C. E., Blondin, C. A., Yaw, J. S., Nalls, M. L., & Williams, R. L. (2012). The relationship of academic self-efficacy to class participation and exam performance. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 233-249. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-011-9175-x

Gan, Z. (2010). Interaction in group oral assessment: A case study of higher-and lower-scoring students. Language Testing, 27, 585-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364049

Harris, J. (2016). Teachers' beliefs about task-based language teaching in Japan. Journal of Asia TEFL, 13, 102-116.

Hsu, W. H. (2015). Transitioning to a communication-oriented pedagogy: Taiwanese university freshmen's views on class participation. System, 49, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.12.002

Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260

Jeon, I. J., & Hahn, J. W. (2006). Exploring EFL teachers' perceptions of task-based language teaching: A case study of Korean secondary school classroom practice. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 123–143. https://asian-efl-journal.com/March_06.pdf#page=123

Kang, D. M. (2014). The effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL learners' willingness to communicate, speaking abilities, and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.025

Khotimah, K. (2018). Implementing task-based language teaching (TBLT) instruction to improve students’speaking participation in islamic boarding school of maulana malik ibrahim, state islamic university of malang. E-Link Journal, 5, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.30736/ej.v5i2.67

Kusuma, I., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Enacting e-portfolios in online English-speaking courses: Speaking performance and self-efficacy. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 75-95. https://ijltr.urmia.ac.ir/article_121273.html

Lai, C., & Li, G. (2011). Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO journal, 28(2), 498-521. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.2.498-521

Masuram, J., & Sripada, P. N. (2020). Developing spoken fluency through task-based teaching. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.080

McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers' and learners' reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00042.x

Moore, P. J. (2018). Task‐based language teaching (TBLT). The TESOL encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 2018, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0175

Namaziandost, E., Hashemifardnia, A., Shafiee, S., & Feng, G. C. (2019). The impact of opinion-gap, reasoning-gap, and information-gap tasks on EFL learners’ speaking fluency. Cogent Social Sciences, 5, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1630150

Nambiar, R. M., Nor, N. M., Ismail, K., & Adam, S. (2017). New learning spaces and transformations in teacher pedagogy and student learning behavior in the language learning classroom. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 23(4). http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-03

Newton, J., & Nguyen, B. T. T. (2019). Task repetition and the public performance of speaking tasks in EFL classes at a Vietnamese high school. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1, 34-56. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00004.new

Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. ELT journal, 47, 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.3.203

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge university press.

Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 279–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587464

Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining'task'. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 12-18. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/September_2006_EBook_editions.pdf#page=12

Onoda, S. (2022). Enhancing creative thinking, critical thinking, and interactional skills through problem-solving group projects among undergraduate English majors in Japan. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 28(2). http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2802-01

Oxford, R. L. (2006). Task-based language teaching and learning: An overview. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 94-121. https://www.academia.edu/download/30902790/Asian_EFL_Proceedings.pdf#page=94

Panduwangi, M. (2021). The effectiveness of task-based language teaching to improve students' speaking skills. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 5(1), 205-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v5i1.2490

Park, Y. (2021). Task type completion in lower level EFL classes: A conversation analytic study. Language Teaching Research, 2021, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820987957

Pica, T. (1991). Classroom interaction, negotiation, and comprehension: Redefining relationships. System, 19, 437-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(91)90024-J

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford University Press. http://www.rcampus.com/users/relvacaroline/upload/file/prabhu_s_chapter_1_the_context.pdf

Prediger, S., Erath, K., & Opitz, E. M. (2019). The language dimension of mathematical difficulties. In International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 437-455). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_27

Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and

Learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135-173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000505

Robinson, P. (2006). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. P. Garcia-Mayo (2007) (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7-26). Multilingual Matters.

Robinson, P. (2011). Task‐based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x

Sarıçoban, A., & Karakurt, L. (2016). The use of task-based activities to improve listening and speaking skills in EFL context. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(6), 445-459. http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/574fcca2eb6a1.pdf

Shimray, R., & Wangdi, T. (2023). Boredom in online foreign language classrooms: Antecedents and solutions from students’ perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/014346 32.2023.2178442

Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003585

Tatar, S. (2005). Classroom participation by international students: The case of Turkish graduate students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(4), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315305280967

Tsou, W. (2005). Improving speaking skills through instruction in oral classroom participation. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02452.x

Uchihara, T., & Clenton, J. (2020). Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language Teaching Research, 24, 540-556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818799371

Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2021). Employing group work for task performances in a task-based learning classroom: Evidence from a University in Thailand. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 27(2). http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2702-07

Waluyo, B. (2019). Task-based language teaching and theme-based role-play: Developing EFL learners’ communicative competence. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 16(1), 153-168.

Waluyo, B., & Bakoko, R. (2022). Effects of affective variables and willingness to communicate on students’ English-speaking performance in Thailand. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21090

Wangdi, T., & Shimray, R. (2022). Qualities of effective EFL English teachers as perceived by Thai university students: A photovoice study. Issues in Educational Research, 32(2), 805-824. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.580541817928055

Wangdi, T., & Zimik, H. R. (2024). Exploring the levels of foreign language enjoyment among Thai students and Its contributing factors through the lens of positive psychology. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 21(1), 244-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2024.21.1.17.244

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3003-17

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157