The Temporal role in Grammatical Performance of Foreign Language Learners of English

Vafa Shojamanesh, Kim Hua Tan, Khazriyati Salehuddin

Abstract


This study evaluates the effects of length of formal learning time on the grammatical performance of English morphosyntactic structures among Iranian foreign language learners. Among different factors affecting language learning, the length of formal language exposure or language input is introduced as an important factor in language learning process. Thus, length of receiving input exposure in the form of formal classroom instruction in the current study is carefully studied by categorizing the participants in four different groups. The participants represented different exposure time groups by having various formal instruction hours at school and/or language center. In order to investigate the role of formal learning time on the performance of the individual morphosyntactic structures, the participants were presented to a timed Grammaticality Judgment Task. The task tested eleven different morphosyntactic structures and contained 132 sentences. The participants were asked to judge the grammaticality of the sentences and do the necessary corrections if needed. Repeated Measures ANOVA and regression analyses were performed to analyse the data. Results revealed the contribution of time on the performance of the individual structures.

 

Keywords: Input exposure; Formal learning time; Grammaticality Judgment Task; Foreign Language Learning; Grammatical performance      


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbasi, M., G. Ahmadi & A Lotfi (2009). Problems of Teaching and Learning English Language Lessons to High School Students in Isfahan from the Perspective of Teachers. Knowledge and research in educational science curriculum. Vol. 22, 131-156.

Barbee, M. (2013). Extracurricular L2 Input in a Japanese EFL Context: Exposure, Attitudes, and Motivation. Second Language Studies Vol. 32 (1), 1-58.

Croft, W. 2007. Construction Grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 463-508.

Crystal, D. (1983). A first Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Vol. 30, John Wiley & Sons.

Diessel, H. (2017). Usage-Based Linguistics. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Farsi Doust, A. (2008). The Effect of English Tenses on the Performance of Iranian EFL learners. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Finneran, D. A. & Leonard, L. B. (2010). Role of linguistic input in third person singular–s use in the speech of young children, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Vol. 53(4), 1065-1074.

Garcia Mayo, M. D. P. (2003). Age, Length of Exposure and

Grammaticality Judgements in the Acquisition of English as a Foreign. In Maria Del Pilar Garcio Mayo & Maria Luisa Garcia Lecumberri (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language, 4: 94, Great Britain: The Cromwell press Ltd.

Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. 2007. Introducing Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 3-21.

Han, Moon-Sub (1991). Comprehensibility and availability of input to adult learners of L2, with special reference to input hypothesis and comprehensible input, Ph.D. Thesis. University of Texas: Austin.

Hassanzade, M. & Narafshan, H. (2016). A Study on Input Quality and Second Language Grammar Achievement in Young Children. International Journal of English Language Teaching. Vol. 4(2), 70-82.

Howard, M. (2011). Input perspectives on the role of learning context in Second Language Acquisition. An introduction to the special issue. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Vol. 49(2), 71-82.

Huebener, M., Kuger, S. & Marcus, J. (2016). Increased instruction hours and the widening gap in student performance. DIW Discussion Papers, No. 1561.

Kang, B. (2005). Acquisition of Language Particular Properties under Impoverished Input. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Connecticut.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford Pergamon.

Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research. Vol. 24(1), 35-63.

Lau, J.H., Clark, A. & Lappin, S. 2014. Measuring Gradience in Speakers’ Grammaticality Judgements. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol. 36(36).

Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In SM Gass and CM Madden (Ed.), Input in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Newbury House Publishers.

Maftoon, P., Yazdani Moghaddam, M., Gholebostan, H. & Beh-Afarin, S.R. (2010). Privatization of English Education in Iran: A Feasibility Study. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language Vol. 13(4).

McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language. Vol. 55(3),

-401.

McDonald, J. L. (2008). Grammaticality judgments in children: The role of age, working memory and phonological ability. Journal of Child Language. Vol. 35(02), 247-268.

Muñoz, C. (2011). Input and long-term effects of starting age in foreign language learning. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Vol. 49(2), 113-133.

Nelson, K. (2006). Advances in Pragmatic Developmental Theory: The case of language acquisition. Essay review of "constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition by M. Tomasello. Human

Development. Vol. 49, 184-188.

Ochieng, L. A. (2013). A Description of the Morphosyntactic Structure of the Suba Language. M.A. Thesis. Egerton University, Kenya.

Oliveria, D.N.C. (2018). The Role of Input Processing in the Acquisition of Motion Verbs with Double Particles in L2 German. M.A. Thesis. Universidade do Minho: Portugal.

Olmedo, M.I. (2014/2015). English language learning beyond the classroom walls. M. A. Thesis. University of Barcelona, Spain.

Putz, M. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1139-1159.

Rahimi, M., Riazi, A. & Saif, S. (2008). An investigation into the factors affecting the use of language learning strategies by Persian EFL learners. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics (CJAL) Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquee (RCLA). Vol. 11(2), 31-60.

Rahimy, R., and Moradkhani, N. (2012). The Effect of Using Grammaticality Judgement Tasks on Iranian EFL Learners’ Knowledge of Grammatical Patterns. Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities. Vol. 1(2), 148-160

Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (Eds). (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. W. A. (Eds). Cambridge University Press. UK.

Rothman, J. & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. 2010. Input Quality Matters: Some Comments on Input Type and Age-Effects in Adult SLA. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 31(2), 301–306.

Serrano Serrano, R. (2007). Time distribution and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Universitat de Barcelona.

Shojamanesh, V., Tan, K. H., and Salehuddin, Kh. (2014). Role of Formal Input Exposure and onset Age in Grammaticality Judgement. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 20(3), 177-19.

Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., and Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Vol. 46(4), 863-877.

Verissimo, J., Heyer, V., Jacob, G. & Clashen, H. (2018). Selective Effects of Age of Acquisition on Morphological Priming: Evidence for a Sensitive Period. Language Acquisition. Vol 25(3), 315-326.

Xiaohui, H. (2010). An Empirical Study on the Effects of Comprehensible Input on Incidental English Vocabulary Recognition. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 33(6), 91-108.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2404-05

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157