The Markedness in Acquiring Do-support in Negation and Inversion by Adult Native-Arabic Speakers Learning English

Elham Salem AL-Makatrah, Mohamad Subakir Mohd Yasin, Mohamed Zain Sulaiman, Mohammad Irshaid Al-Khawaldeh

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to determine whether the markedness phenomenon of Do-support as a specific-language property poses greater difficulties for adult Arabic-speaking learners thereby bringing about more L1 transfer than the auxiliary verbs BE and HAVE. Do-support in the inter-language of adult native-Arabic speakers learning English was insufficiently addressed despite the complexity and that Arabic lacks do-support in negation and inversion. This study was conducted to address this gap within the theoretical framework of Differential Markedness Hypothesis (DMH). A sample of 100 Jordanian students attending Mutah University participated in the study where data was collected using a Multiple-Choice Task (MCT), and a Written Production Task (WPT), involving semi-structured interviews with 30 students from the student sample. The study used descriptive and inferential statistics to analyse the data where the findings showed a committed relationship between the auxiliary type and degree of difficulty that learners in both groups experienced with DO, BE and HAVE. Notably, Do-support poses greater difficulty compared to BE and HAVE where its usage is problematic particularly for beginners, resulting in more incidences of the Arabic influence. The data from the interviews support the results of the two tasks: learners find L2 marked features more difficult than L2 features, which are universal and genuinely part of the syntactic structure. The findings in this study will contribute towards a better understanding of how to develop an improved teaching process to more effective on the markedness and difficulty of Do-support compared to BE and HAVE.

 

Keywords: Arabic L1 influence; auxiliary verbs; do-support; Differential Markedness Hypothesis 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Mekhlafi, M. (2013). A Study of Question Formation in the English Writing of Omani EFL Learners. Standard Journal of Education and Essay. Vol. 1(4), 57-62.

Aoun, J. Choueiri, L. & Benmamoun, E. (2010). The Syntax of Arabic. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bhatt, R. & Hancin-Bhatt, B. (2002). Structural Minimality, CP and the Initial State in Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Research. Vol. 18, 348-392.

Benmamoun, E. (2000). The Feature Structure of Functional Categories: Comparative Study of Arabic Dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.

Blossom, M. S. (2009). Early usage of Do in children with and without Specific Language Impairment. Master thesis. University of Kansas. USA.

Bohnacker, U. (2013). Reflections on Dummy Do in Child Language and Syntactic Theory. In Blom, E., Van de raats, I., & Verhagen, J. (Eds.), Dummy Auxiliaries in First and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 171-208). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Candry, S. (2013). The Acquisition of Do-support by Belgian Dutch-speaking Learners of English. (Unpublished master thesis). University in Ghent, Belgium.

Chomsky, N. (1991). Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In Freidin, R. (Ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Syntax (pp. 417-454). Cambridge: The MIT press.

Culicover, P. W. (2008). The Rise and Fall of Constructions and the History of English Do-Support. Journal of Germanic Linguistics. Vol. 20(1), 1-52.

Ecay, A. W. (2015). A Multi-Step Analysis of the Evolution of English Do-support. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Pennsylvania, USA.

Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. Language Learning. Vol. 27(2), 315-330.

Eckman, F. R. (2008). Typological Markedness and Second Language Phonology. Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. Vol. 36, 95-115.

Eisouh, Z. S. (2011). Negation Errors in English by University of Jordan Students. Reading Improvement. Vol. 48(3), 139-154.

Fakeh, A. (2012). The Syntax of Questions in Modern Standard Arabic: Minimalist Perspective. Saarbrücken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.

Hadley, P. A. (1993). A longitudinal investigation of the auxiliary system in children with specific language impairment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.

Hadley, P. & Rice, M. (1996). Emergent uses of BE and Do: Evidence from children with specific language impairment. Language Acquisition. Vol. 5, 209-243.

Maier, A. (2010). The Structure of Interlanguages: The acquisition of Simple English Interrogatives in Guided Second Language Acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Heinrich Heine University,

Düsseldorf.

Muftah, M. & Wong, B.E. (2011). English Verb Movement Parameter in the Interlanguage of L1 Arabic Speakers. The Linguistics Journal. Vol. 5(1), 125-168.

Perales, S., Mayo, M. D. P. G. & Liceras, J. M. (2009). The Acquisition of L3 English Negation by Bilingual (Spanish/Basque) Learners in an Institutional Setting. International Journal of Bilingualism. Vol. 13(1), 3-33.

Perales, S. (2010). The Status of the Auxiliary Do in L1 and L2 English Negative Clauses. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Vol. 48(1), 1-23.

Pienemann, M., Johnston, M. & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing an Acquisition-based Procedure for Second Language Assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Vol. 10(2), 217-243.

Rowland, C. F. (2007). Explaining Errors in Children’s Questions. Cognition. Vol. 104(1), 106-134.

Rowland, C. F., Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V. & Theakston, A. L. (2005). The Incidence of Error in Young Children's Wh-questions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Vol. 48(2), 384-404.

Rowland, C. F. & Pine, J. M. (2000). Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’ Journal of Child Language. Vol. 27, 157-81.

Santelmann, L., Berk, S., Austin, J., Somashekar, S. & Lust, B. (2002). Continuity and Development in the Acquisition of Inversion in yes/no Questions: Dissociating Movement and Inflection. Journal of Child Language. Vol. 29(4), 813-842.

Sridhanyarat, K. (2017). The Acquisition of L2 Fricatives in Thai Learners’ Interlanguage. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 23(1), 15-34. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-02

Stromswold, K. J. (1990). Learnability and the Acquisition of Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. USA.

Tawalbeh, Z. (2013). The Effect of Colloquial Jordanian Arabic on Learning the English Definite Article and Negation. English Language Teaching. Vol. 6(8), 95-107.

Umale, J. (2011). The Effect of Consciousness Raising on Errors in L2 Question Formation: An Investigation of Omani Students. Arab World English. Vol. 2(4), 88-135.

VanPatten, B. (1996). Input Processing and Grammar Instruction. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Zdorenk, T. (2010). Constructions in Child Second Language Acquisition: Exploring the Role of First Language and Usage (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Canada.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157