Focus and Scope
Focus
e-Bangi Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities publishes original research and review articles of full spectrum of social and behavioral sciences and the humanities.
Scope
e-Bangi Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities provides a unique forum for theoretical debates, literature review discussion and empirical analysis across the field of social and behavioral sciences and the humanities, including:
- Sociology
- Anthropology
- Political sciences
- History
- Geography
- Psychology
- Language
- Social work and social policy
- Education
- Law
- Media and communication
- Environment
Section Policies
Article
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Special Theme
Open Submissions | Indexed | Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
e-Bangi Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities relies on effective peer review processes to uphold not only the quality and validity of individual articles, but also the overall integrity of the journal. Based on current practice, the integrant is due to the double-blind review system. All reviewers from various expertise are on voluntary basic.
- the manuscript is within their area of expertise.
- they can dedicate the appropriate time to conduct a critical review of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers should declare their conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from the peer-review process if a conflict exists.
Conflict of interest (COI) exists when there is a divergence between an individual’s private interests (competing interests) and his or her responsibilities to scientific and publishing activities such that a reasonable observer might wonder if the individual’s behavior or judgment was motivated by considerations of his or her competing interests.
Plagiarism
All manuscripts submitted to e-Bangi Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities will go through plagiarism check immediately after the submission if the manuscript is within the scope of the journal. A similarity score of below 15% would probably indicate that plagiarism has not occurred.
Evaluation:
- Originality
- Contribution to the field
- Technical quality
- Clarity of presentation
- Depth of research
The report should be accurate, objective, constructive and unambiguous. Comments should be backed by facts and constructive arguments with regards to the content of the manuscript. Reviewers should avoid using “hostile, derogatory and accusatory comments
Recommendation
- Accept
- Requires minor corrections
- Requires moderate revision
- Requires major revision
- Not suitable for the journal. Submit to another publication such as (suggest a journal)
- Reject
Processing time
This entire review process will take anywhere between 2 – 4 months after the submission of the article. The editor’s decision is final.Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.