An Analysis of Russel Brand’s Vlog on “The Truth about Pfizer’s Vaccines”
Abstract
The spread of misinformation is a growing concern in today's digital age. The Vlog by Russel Brand titled "The Truth about Pfizer's Vaccines" features various claims about the safety and efficacy of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. The study sought to answer the question, “How does the Vlog “The Truth about Pfizer’s Vaccines” constructed for public understanding and engagement?” The study used Kenneth Burke’s Dramatism Theory to examine the arguments in Russel Brand’s Vlog. It analyzed both stated and implied messages and made an in-depth look at the underlying reasons and purpose of such messages and meaning-making. In this study, Brand’s Vlog on Pfizer’s vaccines was examined using Burke’s Pentad. The study used a qualitative design with Textual Analysis as a tool. Concepts of construction, understanding, and engagement were examined using Dramatic Pentad while understanding and engagement were analyzed using Identification and Guilt. The Vlog “The Truth about Pfizer’s Vaccines” was constructed for public awareness and engagement, not so much for understanding. The Vlog emphasized the possible conspiracy between academic scientists and pharmaceutical giants. It, however, failed to provide an understanding as to how the system operates given the health crisis, professional and ethical standards of industries and communities involved, and policies, programs, and regulations both in the private and public sectors. Overall, Brand’s Vlog appealed to the public with this formula: Keep the discussion simple, center on the message by repetition, and target the public’s emotions.
Keywords: Vlog, dramatism, conspiracy, pharmaceutical industry, Pfizer vaccine.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236.
Azizan, M., Saifuddin, M. Z., Zulkifli, N., & Ismail, W. (2023). Organisational identity construction on social media amidst COVID-19: The case of a fast-food chain in Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/mj33
Betsch, C. (2020). The psychology of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 327-334.
Burke, K. (1973). Philosophy of literary form (3rd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Brand, R. (2021, January 15). The truth about Pfizer's vaccines [YouTube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEoNZSLabLc
De Vera-Ruiz, E. (2022, October 11). Internet, TV top sources of fake political news, survey says. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2022/10/11/internet-tv-top-sources-of-fake-political-news-survey-says/
Di Placido, D. (2021, Sept 29). The backlash against Russell Brand, explained. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2021/09/29/the-backlash-against-russell-brand-explained/?sh=1fe0bbfa1e8f
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538-542. https://doi.org/gcp9pw
Ecker, U. K. H., Swire, B., & Lewandowsky, S. (2020). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(4), 1-57.
Freedman, L. Z., & Fraser, M. W. (2020). Misinformation and the Coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19) pandemic. JAMA, 323(14), 1379-1380.
Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23.
Jackob, N. (2012). The tendency to trust as individual predisposition—Exploring the associations between interpersonal trust, trust in the media and trust in institutions. Communications, 37(1), 99–120.
Ladd, J. M. (2010). The role of media distrust in partisan voting. Political Behavior, 32(4), 567–585.
Littlejohn, S., & Foss, K. (2005). Theories of human communication (8th ed.) USUS: Thgomson and Wadworth.
Luo, D., Nor, N. H. M., Bai, K., Adzmi, A. M., & Rais, S. S. A. (2023). Fake news sharing among Weibo users in China. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 284-305.
Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture, or performance in disaffected democracies. In S. Pharr & R. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 52–73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). The effects of fact-checking on elites: A field experiment on U.S. state legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3).
Pew Research Center. (2020, Dec 7). Americans are familiar with new digital platforms, but few use them for news. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/12/08/measuring-news-consumption-in-a-digital-era/pj_2020-12-08_news-consumption_0-02/
Tsfati, Y., & Ariely, G. (2014). Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries. Communication Research, 41(6), 760–782.
Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529.
Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions: The case of Gaza settlers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 28–51.
UNDP. (2022, November). Mapping and analysis of efforts to counter information pollution in Europe and Central Asia Region. https://www.undp.org/eurasia/publications/information-pollution
UNDP. (n.d.). RISE ABOVE: Countering misinformation and disinformation in the crisis setting. https://www.undp.org/eurasia/dis/misinformation?gclid=Cj0KCQiA6LyfBhC3ARIsAG4gkF9aXe55UmDNp_4juMnP49GLuc97tg4_C1nm7MpxJhQiMBYiYG0JP3AaAoTmEALw_wcB
University of Michigan Library. (2023, June 26). "Fake news," Lies and propaganda: How to sort fact from fiction. M Library. https://guides.lib.umich.edu/fakenews
Xinyu, L., Weize, L., & Salleh, S. M. (2023). Misinformation in communication studies: A review and bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 467-488. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3904-25
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528