Mediatization and Populism Approach through Media Content Analysis of Newspapers during Sarawak’s Election and Midterm Transition Government 2020

Mohd Nashriq Nizam, Hasmah Zanuddin, Mohamad Saleeh Rahamad @ Ahamad

Abstract


This paper aims to investigate the relationship and adaptation of mediatization of politics with populism into media content of seven (7) Sarawak newspapers, namely Borneo Post, New Sarawak Tribune, Utusan Sarawak, Utusan Borneo, Suara Sarawak, See Hua Daily, and Sin Chew Daily during Sarawak's election and the Midterm Transition of Malaysia Government 2020 by using quantitative content analysis. The Hoslti Inter-coder reliability and validity, Chi-Square, and One-way ANOVA tests were used on 695 news items. The results demonstrate that the Hoslti Inter-coder reliability and validity averaged 93%, above 70%. The Chi-Square test proved the news headline, government initiation, government response, and blame attribution (substance blame and non-policy blame) at the 0.001 level (2 tailed p<0.0005), and we rejected the null hypothesis. As for opposition response, and blame attribution (substance and non-policy blame), the p-value is more significance level (2-tailed p>0.0005), and we do not reject the null hypothesis. For mediatization of politics, only two (2) issues under media logic have p-values above .05, which are conflict (0.054) and opinionated and narrative news articles (0.143) with F values of 6.957 and 6.364. In political logic, result showed that p-value is less than .05 which there is a statistically significant difference in newspaper coverage.  Anti-elitism (0.161) has a p-value more significant than .05, with F value is 1.797 in populism. People-centrism and mistrust of experts have p-values less than .05. This results in a statistically significant difference in newspaper coverage.

 

Keywords: Mediatization of politics, populism, newspapers, content analysis, Sarawak.

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3903-01


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abts, K., & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x

Aga, A. (2021, December 22). Len Talif: GPS’ resounding victory in state polls shows S’wakians want political stability. The Borneo Post.

https://www.theborneopost.com/2021/12/22/len-talif-gps-resounding-victory-in-state-polls-shows-swakians-want-political-stability/

Almahallawi, W., & Zanuddin, H. (2018). 50 days of war on innocent civilian: Ma'an News Agency coverage of Israeli and Palestinian conflict. Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.9), 145-150.

Asp, K. (1990). Medialization, media logic and mediarchy. Nordicom Review, 11(2), 47–50.

Astro Awani. (2020, February 28). Malay Rulers special meeting to discuss the country's political turmoil. https://www.astroawani.com/berita-politik/malay-rulers-special-meeting-discuss-countrys-political-turmoil-232009

Aydin, Z., Fuess, A., Sunier, T., & Vàzquez, A. G. (2021). The web of hate: fragmentation of media authority and its link to right-wing populism and cyber Islamophobia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(3), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3703-13

Cheneval, F., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). The case for demoicracy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 334-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02262.x

Chin, J. (2018). Sabah and Sarawak in the 14th general election 2018 (GE14): Local factors and state nationalism. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 173-192.

Council of Europe. (2020, March 29). Elections and Covid 19. https://rm.coe.int./election-and-covid19/16809e20fe

Govindasamy, A. R. (2021). From Pakatan Harapan to Perikatan Nasional: A missed opportunity for reforms for East Malaysia? Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

Haßler, J., Maurer, M., & Oschatz, C. (2014). Media logic and political logic online and offline: The case of climate change communication. Journalism Practice, 8(3), 326-341.

Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Venezuela's Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Holsti, O. R. (1980). Content analysis for social sciences and humanities: An alternative view. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(4), 666.

Jungherr, A., Schoen, H., & Jurgens, P. (2015). The mediation of politics through Twitter: An analysis of messages posted during the campaign for the German Federal Election 2013. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12143

Karidi, M. (2018). News media logic on the move? In search of commercial media logic in German news. Journalism Studies, 19(9), 1237-1256.

Kelm, O., Dohle, M., & Bernhard, U. (2019). Politicians’ self-reported social media activities and perceptions: Results from four surveys among German parliamentarians. Social Media + Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119837679

Kho,S. N., & Zawawi, J. W. (2023). Systematic review of mediatization of politics in Southeast Asia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(1), 294-308. https://doi.org/kr3t

Kho, S. N., Chang, P. K., Abdul Latiff, A., & Korff, R. (2015). Mediatization of politics in developing nation: An analysis of YouTube political reporting in Malaysia. eBangi: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(2), 274-285.

Kraus, P. A. (2021). Popular Republicanism versus populism: Articulating the people. Social Sciences, 10, 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10100366

Leong, P. P. Y. (2021). Digital mediatization and the sharpening of Malaysian political contests. Yusof Ishak Institute.

Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything: Ica Presidential Address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x

Lynch, S., & Peer, L. (2002). Analyzing newspaper content: A how-to guide. Cambridge: Readership Institute.

Manucci, L. (2017). Populism and the media. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (Chap. 24, pp. 467–488). Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.17

Marcos-Marne, H., Llamazares, I., & Shikano, S. (2022). Left-right radicalism and populist attitudes in France and Spain. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 30(4), 608-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.1918650

Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Populism and the media. In Albertazzi, D. & McDonnell, D. (Eds.) Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of western European democracy (pp. 49-64). Palgrave Macmillan.

Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization" of politics: A challenge for democracy?. Political Communication, 16(3), 247-261.

McGuire, W. (1981). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In Rice, R., & Paisley, W. (Eds.), Public communication campaigns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

Muller, J. W. (2016). What is populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

New Straits Times (NST). (2021, Nov 5). Sarawak state assembly dissolved – Abang Johari. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2021/11/742747/sarawak-state-assembly-dissolved-abang-johari

Nicolaïdis, K. (2004). The new constitution as european ‘demoi‐cracy’? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 7(1), 76-93.

Pintak, L., Bowe, B. J., & Nazir, S. J. (2018). Mediatization in Pakistan: Perceptions of media influence on a fragile democracy. Journalism, 19(7), 934–958.

Rahn, W., & Oliver, E. (2016, March 9). Trump’s voters aren’t authoritarians, new research says. So what are they? The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/03/09/trumps-voters-arent-authoritarians-new-research-says-so-what-are-they/?noredirect=on

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster.

Saifuddin, N., & Zanuddin, H. (2020). Malaysian social media postings and public agenda setting review in the portrayal of interpersonal violence. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(8), 490-506.

Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097

Strömbäck, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization. International Communication Gazette, 75(4), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513482266

Trenz, H. J. (2008). Understanding media impact on European integration: Enhancing or restricting the scope of legitimacy of the EU? Journal of European Integration, 30(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330802005516

Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A., Ernst, N., Büchel, F., Caramani, D., Manucci, L., Steenbergen, M., Bernhard, L., Weber, E., Hänggli, R., Dalmus, C. & Schemer, C. (2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. NCCR Democracy Working Paper No. 8. Universiti of Zurich. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-127461


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528