Mainstreaming Religious Moderation in the Digital Space: An Examination of Islami.co Web Portal in the Perspective of Jürgen Habermas’ Communicative Rationality

Mukhammad Zamzami, Siti Roisadul Nisok, Muktafi ., Abd A'la, Zumrotul Mukaffa

Abstract


The development of popular Islamic media in the digital era, associated with an authority shift from traditional to popular religion, has enhanced peoples’ ways of thinking. Ironically, conservative and radical Islamic models have dominated the digital space. Therefore, in response to this phenomenon, this research examines how the mainstreaming strategy of religious moderation is carried out by moderate groups, specifically a non-affiliated Islamic portal called Islami.co, with the tagline “Enlightening and Friendly Islamic Media.” This research also analyzed articles, concepts, and perspectives to determine whether they are in the moderate category using the Jürgen Habermas’ theory of communicative rationality. Furthermore, the essays in the islami.co were analyzed according to three kinds of validity claims, namely truth, accuracy, and honesty. This study concluded that mainstreaming religious moderation through this islami.co’s media significantly impacts the community as a filter from news content or thoughts that do not reflect the Islamic value of mercy to all mankind. Islami.co’s writers continuously endeavor to test conservative-radical Islamic narratives that develop in a society with logical (aqli) and religious (naqli) arguments presented with brief and uncomplicated explanations. The strategy of popular Islamic portals such as islami.co is quite acceptable to middle-class Muslims, as often preached by the fundamentalist groups. Therefore, it is very appropriate to direct islami.co’s target audience to readers from the general public.

 

Keywords: Religious moderation, digital space, Islami.co, communicative rationality, religious authority.

 

https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3901-05


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahlhaus, S. (2021, June). Plural reconstruction: A method of critical theory for the analysis of emerging and contested political practices. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 48(5), 703–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211017570

Akmaliah, W. (2020). The demise of moderate Islam: New media, contestation, and reclaiming religious authorities. IJIMS, 10(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/jwfh

Ali, M. S. (2013, August 2). Kenapa Aku bikin Islami[dot]co? Islami.co. https://islami.co/kenapa-aku-bikin-islami-dot-co/

Aubert, I. (2021). Social inclusion, a challenge for deliberative democracy? Some reflections on Habermas’s political theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(4), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431020983781

Auxier, B. E., & Vitak, J. (2019). Factors motivating customization and echo chamber creation within digital news environments. Social Media + Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119847506

Aydin, Z., Fuess, A., Sunier T., & Vázquez, A. G. (2021). The web of hate: Fragmentation of media authority and its link to right-wing populism and cyber Islamophobia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3703-13

Azlan, A. A., & Rahim S. A. (2017). Situation complexity: Delineating situational factors affecting individual communicative action in problem solving. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 31(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2017-3301-17

Bachtiar, H., Anggraeni, L., & Asep, M. (2019). Rethinking the contemporary discourse of jihād. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 9(2), 306-325. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2019.9.1.306-325

Blau, A. (2019). Habermas on rationality: Means, Ends and Communication. European Journal of Political Theory, 21(2), 321–344. https://doi.org/jwfk

Bourchier, D. M. (2019). Two decades of ideological contestation in Indonesia: From democratic cosmopolitanism to religious nationalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 713-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1590620

Bozdag, C. (2020). Managing diverse online networks in the context of polarization: Understanding how we grow apart on and through social media. Social Media + Society, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120975713

Campbell, H. A. (2020). Digital creatives and the rethinking of religious authority. London: Routledge.

Choironi, M. A. N. (2020, August 31). Cinta tanah air dianggap thagut, ulama senior Al-Azhar: Cinta tanah air adalah hal yang dibenci para teroris. Islami.co. https://islami.co/cinta-tanah-air-dianggap-thagut-ulama-senior-al-azhar-cinta-tanah-air-adalah-hal-yang-dibenci-para-teroris/

Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Cook, D. (2015). Understanding jihad. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Diprose, R., McRae, D., & Hadiz, V. (2019). Two decades of reformasi in Indonesia: Its illiberal turn. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 691-693. https://doi.org/gf5qm4

Feteris, E. T. (Ed.) (2017). Habermas’s discourse theory and the rationality of legal discourse. In, Fundamentals of legal argumentation. argumentation library: A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions (Vol. 1, pp. 77-93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4_5

Fossati, D. (2019). The resurgence of ideology in Indonesia: Political Islam, aliran and political behaviour. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 38(2), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103419868400

Frias, F. J. L. (2021). Beyond Habermas, with Habermas: Adjudicating ethical issues in sport through a discourse ethics-based normative theory of sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 15(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2019.1637367

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society, translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Hadiz, V. R. (2021). Indonesia’s missing left and the islamisation of dissent. Third World Quarterly, 42(3), 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1768064

Halton, E. (2019). Review of Jürgen Habermas the theory of communicative action. Symbolic Interaction, 12(2), 333-360.

Haramain, M., & Aminah, S. (2022). Peaceful Da’wah and Religious Conflicts in Contemporary Indonesia. KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial dan Keagamaan, 14(2), 208-223.

Hefni, W. (2020). Moderasi beragama dalam ruang digital: Studi pengarusutamaan moderasi beragama di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v13i1.182

Istadiyantha. (2018). Revealing the Propaganda of Communication between the Islamic Fundamentalism Activists of the Middle East and Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(2).

Jezierska, K. (2019). With Habermas against Habermas: Deliberation without consensus. Journal of Public Deliberation, 15(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.326

Khairally, E. T. (2018). Komparasi kesetaraan gender dalam situs suara-Islam dan Islami.co (Undergraduate thesis, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia).

Kim, J. N., Grunig, J. E., & Ni, L (2010). Reconceptualizing the communicative action of publics: Acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in problematic situations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4(2), 126-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531181003701913

Kitchens, B., Johnson, S., & Gray, P. (2020). Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS Quarterly, 44(4), 1619-1649.

Nisa, E. F. (2018). Social Media and the Birth of an Islamic Social Movement: ODOJ (One Day One Juz) in Contemporary Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(134, Special Issue: Practising Islam through Social Media in Indonesia), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2017.1416758

O'Hara, K., & Stevens, D. (2015), Echo chambers and online radicalism: Assessing the internet's complicity in violent extremism. Policy & Internet, 7(4), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.88

Paterson, T. (2019). Indonesian cyberspace expansion: A double-edged sword. Journal of Cyber Policy, 4(2), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2019.1627476

Peterson, K. M., & Campbell, H. (2020). Introduction essay: Special issue of RMDC on public scholarship, media and religion. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 9(2), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-BJA10016

PPIM UIN Jakarta. (2020). Beragama di dunia maya: Media sosial dan pandangan keagamaan di Indonesia. Monografi MERIT Indonesia, 1(1), 43-44. https://ppim.uinjkt.ac.id/download/beragama-di-dunia-maya-media-sosial-dan-pandangan-keagamaan-di-indone/

Qurtubi, M. I. J. (1964). al-Jami’ li Ahkam al-Quran. Beirut: Muassasat al-Risalah.

Ropi, I. (2019). Whither religious moderation? The state and management of religious affairs in contemporary Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 26(3), 597-601. https://doi.org/ggpbzz

Safrodin, S. (2022). Religious freedom in the context of Islamic da'wa. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 42(1), 144-159. https://doi.org/10.21580/jid.v42.1.11860

Solahudin, D., & Fakhruroji, M. (2020). Internet and Islamic learning practices in Indonesia: Social media, religious populism, and religious authority. Religions, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11010019

Spector, B. (2020). Post-truth claims and the wishing away of brute facts. Leadership, 16(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019885771

Suharto, T. (2019). Examining the moderate understanding of Islam among higher education students of the State Institute of Islamic Studies Surakarta. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 9(1), 60–80.

Supriansyah. (2020, October 21). Menelusuri perdebatan moderatisme Islam dan ultra-konservatisme di Internet. Islami.co. https://islami.co/menelusuri-perdebatan-moderatisme-islam-dan-ultra-konservatisme-di-internet/

Suraya., & Mulyana, A. (2020). Radicalism on teens as the effect of digital media usage. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/gk3c

Thoyibi, M., Khisbiyah, Y., & Aly, A. (2018). Kontestasi wacana keislaman di dunia maya: Moderatisme, ekstremisme, dan hipernasionalisme. Surakarta: Pusat Studi Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Udin, N. H. (2018). Kontestasi antara Muslim fundamentalis dan Muslim liberal dalam perebutan makna sosial keagamaan di Indonesia. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 8(1), 168-190. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2018.8.1.164-186

Yakhsyallah. (2021, April 11). Jihad menurut para ulama: Tidak selamanya bermakna perang. Islami.co. https://islami.co/jihad-menurut-para-ulama-tidak-selamanya-bermakna-perang/

Zuhdi, M. (2018). Challenging moderate Muslims: Indonesia’s Muslim schools in the midst of religious conservatism. Religions, 9(10), 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9100310


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


e-ISSN: 2289-1528