Anies Baswedan’s Rhetoric amid Political Polarization for COVID-19 Handling in Jakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Political leaders worldwide used a diverse model of communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rhetoric becomes an important aspect to comprehend the particular elite communication model. This article discusses Anies Baswedan’s political rhetoric in COVID-19 handling wherein some cases contradict central government policies. Given the increasing political polarisation in Jakarta, Baswedan has become one of the most controversial actors in the national political arena. We use a political rhetorical analysis approach to understand Baswedan’s political actions and rhetoric. Furthermore, we determine that Baswedan’s model of rhetoric political communication is consistent and different from most political elites whose deliberative style is more dominant. Baswedan appears to employ a different type of rhetoric when countering the central government’s opinion and gaining public support. In the former, Baswedan primarily applies the type of bureaucratic rhetoric, which tends to be more technical. Conversely, Baswedan tends to choose the rhetorical style of advice when narrating the idea of handling the COVID-19 outbreak. Moreover, the COVID-19 outbreak provides important momentum for Baswedan to improve his image as an elite political personality and as the governor of Jakarta. Our study significantly contributes to understanding rhetoric as an important model for elite political communication in the face of crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and comprehending rhetoric’s impact on the elite and society.
Keywords: Political rhetoric, Anies Baswedan, political polarisation, COVID-19, Jakarta.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aalberg, T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). Introduction: Comprehending populist political communication. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, & C. De Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (Part1, pp. 3-11). Routledge.
Ajzenman, N., Cavalcanti, T., & Da Mata, D. (2020). More than words: Leaders’ speech and risky behavior during a pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/ggv6r4
Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., & Yang, D. Y. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104254. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3570274
Aspinall, E. (2014). Indonesia’s 2014 elections: Parliament and patronage. Journal of Democracy, 25(4), 96–110.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273-306.
Basith, A. (2020). Pengusaha minta relaksasi PSBB dengan memperhatikan protokol kesehatan. Kontan.co.id. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/pengusaha-minta-relaksasi-PSBB-dengan-memperhatikan-protokol-kesehatan
Brummett, B. (2003). A rhetoric of style. Southern Illinois University Press.
Burhani, A. N. (2020). Baswedan: His political career, COVID-19, and the 2024 presidential election. ISEAS Perspective, 48, 1–8.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politician and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
CNN Indonesia. (2020, April 2). Anies lapor ke Wapres kondisi corona di Jakarta [Video]. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/tv/20200402163730-407-489699/video-anies-lapor-ke-wapres-kondisi-corona-di-jakarta
Crines. (2014). The rhetoric of neoliberalism in the politics of crisis. Global Discourse, 5(1), 116–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2014.922360
Damarjati, D. (2020, May 11). Anies sindir pemerintah pusat dalam wawancara dengan media Australia. Detik News. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5010135/anies-sindir-pemerintah-pusat-dalam-wawancara-dengan-media-australia
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How Citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 729–45.
Faris, R., Clark, J., Etling, B., Kaiser, J., Roberts, H., Schmitt, C., Tilton, C., & Benkler, Y. (2020). Polarization and the Pandemic: American Political Discourse, March–May 2020. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication.
https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37366128
Finlayson, A. (2012). Rhetoric and the political theory of ideologies. Political Studies, 60(4), 751–67.
Finlayson, A. (2019). Rethinking political communication. The Political Quarterly, 90(S1), 77-91.
Finlayson, A. (2020). YouTube and political ideologies: Technology, populism and rhetorical form. Political Studies. Political Studies, 70(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/ghdpzt
Goddard, S. E., & Krebs, R. R. (2015). Rhetoric, legitimation, and grand strategy. Security Studies, 24(1), 5-36.
Gollust, S. E., Nagler, R. H., & Fowler, E. F. (2020). The emergence of COVID-19 in the US: A public health and political communication crisis. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 967–981. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8641506
Green, J., Edgerton, J., Naftel, D., Shoub, K., & Cranmer, S. J. (2020). Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 6(28), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc2717
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–23. https://doi.org/bwqn59
Hendrikus, D. W. (2015). Retorika (Terampil berpidato, berdiskusi, berargumentasi, bernegosiasi). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Ihlen, Ø. (2020). Science communication, strategic communication and rhetoric: The case of health authorities, vaccine hesitancy, trust and credibility. Journal of Communication Management, 24(3), 163–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-03-2020-0017
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–46.
Kahn, L. (2020). Who’s in charge? Leadership during epidemics, bioterror attacks, and other public health crises. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Security International.
Kane, J., & Patapan, H. (2010). The artless art: Leadership and the limits of democratic rhetoric. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 371–89.
Kane, J., & Patapan, H. (2012). The democratic leader: How democracy defines, empowers and limits its leaders. Oxford University Press.
Karlsen, R. (2015). Followers are opinion leaders: The role of people in the flow of political communication on and beyond social networking sites. European Journal of Communication, 30(3), 301-318.
Kock, C. E. J. (2009). Choice is not true or false: The domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation: An International Journal of Reasoning, 23(1), 61-80.
Kreps, S. E., & Kriner, D. L. (2020). Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 6(43), 1-12.
Lilleker, D., Coman, I. A., Gregor, M., & Novelli, E. (2021). Political communication and COVID-19: Governance and rhetoric in times of crisis. Routledge.
Martin, J. (2014). Politics and rhetoric: A critical introduction. Routledge.
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/gdfg7m
Mietzner, M. (2020). Populist anti-scientism, religious polarisation, and institutionalised corruption: How Indonesia’s democratic decline shaped its COVID-19 response. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(2), 227–49. https://doi.org/gg7m8h
Montoya-Williams, D., & Fuentes-Afflick, E. (2019). Political determinants of population health. JAMA Network Open, 2(7).
Mustakim. (2020). Pandemi, Gubernur Anies dan Presiden Jokowi yang tak sehati. Kompas TV. 2020.
Nimmo, D. (1978). Political communication and public opinion in America. Good Year Publishing Company.
Ortega, F., & Orsini, M. (2020). Governing COVID-19 without government in Brazil: Ignorance, neoliberal authoritarianism, and the collapse of public health leadership. Global Public Health, 15(9), 1257–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1795223
Pemprov DKI Jakarta. (2020). Pesan Untuk ASN DKI Jakarta. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4_7BcnUyJg
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101-127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
Rahman, D. F. (2020, April 2). People are dying, ‘Pak’ Ma’ruf: Anies reports Jakarta’s harrowing situation to VP. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/04/02/people-are-dying-pak-maruf-anies-reports-jakartas-harrowing-situation-to-vp.html
Rapp, C. (2002, May 2). Aristotle’s rhetoric. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/#pagetopright
Reinemann, C., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2016). Populist political communication: Toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Stromback, & C. De Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 12-26). Routledge.
Renshon, S. A. (2000). Political leadership as social capital: Governing in a divided national culture. Political Psychology, 21(1), 199-226.
Riaz, S., Buchanan, S., & Ruebottom, T. (2016). Rhetoric of epistemic authority: Defending field positions during the financial crisis. Human Relations, 69(7), 1533–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715614385
Setiawan, R. (2020, March 15). Anies bicara Jakarta lockdown karena jadi pusat penularan Corona. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/anies-bicara-jakarta-lockdown-karena-jadi-pusat-penularan-corona-eFfU
Turner, L., & West, R. (2007). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (3rd ed. international). McGrawHill.
Valentino, N. A., Neuner, F. G., & Vandenbroek, L. M. (2018). The changing norms of racial political rhetoric and the end of racial priming. The Journal of Politics, 80(3), 757-771.
Van Zoonen, L., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (2000). Personalisation in Dutch and German politics: The case of talk show. Javnost-The Public, 7(2), 45-56.
Warburton, E. (2019, April 16). Polarisation in Indonesia: What if perception is reality? New Mandala.
https://www.newmandala.org/how-polarised-is-indonesia/
Warburton, E. (2020). Deepening polarization and democratic decline in Indonesia. In H. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Political polarization in South and Southeast Asia: Old devisions and new dangers (pp. 25-40). Endowment for International Peace.
Webb, P., & Poguntke, T. (2013). The presidentialisation of politics thesis defended. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(3), 646-654.
West, R. L., Turner, L. H., & Zhao, G. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (Vol. 2). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Wijaya, L. D. (2020, May 9). Polemik Bansos, anak buah Baswedan angkat bicara. Tempo.Co. https://metro.tempo.co/read/1340291/polemik-bnsos-dki-anak-buah-anies-baswedan-angkat-bicara
Yin, Y., Gao, J., Jones, B. F., & Wang, D. (2021). Coevolution of policy and science during the pandemic. Science, 371(6525), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3084
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
e-ISSN: 2289-1528