Menerajui Program Doktor Pendidikan: Dilema, Cabaran dan Potensi Perkembangan (Steering Doctor of Education Program: Dilemmas, Challenges and Potentials of Development)
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, W.P., Krauskopf, C.J., Rogers, M.E. & Neal, G.W. 1984. Reasons for comprehensive examinations: A reevaluation. Teaching of Psychology 11(2): 78-80.
Bourner, T., Bowden, R. & Laing, S. 2001. Professional doctorates in England. Studies in Higher Education 26(1): 65-83.
Brown, D. 2001. The social sources of educational credentialism: Status cultures, labour markets, and organizations. Sociology of Education 74 (extra issue): 19-34.
Collins, R. 2002. Credential inflation and the future of universities. In The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by Brint, S. Stanford, CA: Standard University Press.
Eisenberg, T. 1965. Are doctoral comprehensive examinations necessary? American Psychologist 20(2): 168-169.
Fenge, L. 2009. Professional doctorates: A better route for researching professionals? Social Work Education 28(2): 165-176.
Heath, L. 2006. Supervision of professional doctorates: Education doctorates in English universitis. Higher Education Review 38(2): 21-39.
Heiss, A.M. 1970. Challenges to Graduate Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Knowles, M.S. 1965. A general theory of the Doctorate in Education. Adult Education, Spring, 13-141.
Lee, A., Brennan, M. & Green, B. 2009. Re-imaging doctoral education: Profesional doctorates and beyond. Higher Education Research and Development 28(3): 275-287.
Marie, T. & Donald, T. 1999. Relationship between comprehensive examination requirement in clinical psychology doctoral programs and score on the examination for professional practice in psychology. Journal of Instructional Psychology 26(1): 64-66.
Maxwell, T. 2003. From fi rst to second generation professional doctorate. Studies in Higher Education 28(3): 279-291.
Ng, S.F., Nik Muhd, N.M., Ab Rahman, K. & Ismail, N. 2011. Infl uential factors to pursue doctorate degree in Malaysia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15: 2028-2032.
Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Pendidikan. 2008. Dokumen ISO MS 9001:2008. Penang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Sanders, G., Kuit, J., Smith, P., Fulton, J. & Curtis, H. 2011. Identity, refl ection and developmental networks as processes in professional doctorate development. Work Based Learning E-journal 2 (1): 113-132.
Servage, L. 2009. Alternative and professional doctoral programs: What is driving the demand? Studies in Higher Education 34(7): 765-779.
Taylor, A. 2007. Learning to become researching professionals: The case of the doctorate of education. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education 19(2): 154-166.
UKCGE (UK Council for Graduate Education). 2002. Report on Professional Doctorates. Dudley: UK Council for Graduate Education.
Wellington, J. & Sikes, P. 2006. ‘A doctorate in a tight compartment’: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professioanl lives? Studies in Higher Education 31(6): 723-734
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License