Sudut Pandangan dalam 7 Hari Mencintaiku: Analisis Stilistik (Point of View in 7 Hari Mencintaiku: A Stylistic Analysis)
Abstract
ABSTRAK: Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis sudut pandangan pengarang dalam karya sastera moden. Teks yang dikaji ialah novel 7 Hari Mencintaiku oleh Siti Rosmizah. Makalah ini tertumpu kepada 138 bab keseluruhan. Kajian ini meneliti unsur modaliti yang digunakan pengarang untuk menggambarkan sudut pandangan ketiga serba tahu. Modul tatabahasa sudut pandangan Paul Simpson (1993) digunakan dalam mengkategorikan bentuk-bentuk modaliti yang dikenal pasti dalam teks kajian. Hasil kajian menemukan sejumlah 168 penggunaan bentuk modaliti yang terdiri daripada empat jenis modaliti, iaitu modaliti epistemik, modaliti keinginan, modaliti deontik dan modaliti persepsi. Modaliti epistemik menguasai pemilihan bentuk modaliti iaitu sebanyak 142 penggunaan, iaitu 60 modal kata bantu dan 82 modal kata kerja leksikal. Pengarang menggunakan leksikal tahu, yakin, dan pasti untuk kata kerja leksikal ragaman epistemik dan leksikal mungkin, akan, patut dan dapat untuk kata bantu ragaman secara produktif dalam memperlihatkan sudut pandangan ketiga serba tahu. Kesemua modaliti yang digunakan dalam karya ini menggambarkan pengarang berkeupayaan mengakses pemikiran dan perasaan watak secara bebas pada bila-bila masa. Dapatan kajian ini memberi gambaran tentang gaya pengarang Melayu yang cenderung menggunakan modaliti yang merepresentasikan kepastian dan ketidakpastian watak terhadap pengetahuan yang dimiliki oleh pengarang serba tahu. Selain itu, pengkajian sudut pandangan melalui unsur modaliti berupaya memperlihatkan bagaimana modaliti digunakan oleh pengarang dalam menunjukkan sikapnya terhadap pendapat dan kebenaran dalam peristiwa naratif. Kajian ini telah menyumbang tentang kajian sudut pandangan dalam teks sastera Melayu dari sudut stilistik.
Kata kunci: Sudut pandangan; modaliti; epistemik; stilistik; 7 Hari Mencintaiku
ABSTRACT: The study aims to analyse the narrator’s point of view in modern literary texts. The text studied is 7 Hari Mencintaiku by Siti Rosmizah Ismail. The study concentrated on 138 chapters in the novel. This research focuses on analyzing modality used by the author to describe omniscient third person point of view. This study applies Paul Simpson’s (1993) modal grammar of point of view in categorizing the modality forms that were identified in the research text. The result of the research indicates that there were 168 usages of modality forms which comprised four types of modalities which were epistemic modality, boulomaic modality, deontic modality and perception modality. Epistemic modality dominated the choice of modality form which was 142 usages, consisting of 60 modal verbs and 82 lexical verbs. The author used lexical tahu, yakin, and pasti for modal lexical verbs and lexical mungkin, akan, patut dan dapat for modal auxiliry verbs productively in portraying the all-knowing third point of view. All the modalities used in this work displayed the author’s ability to freely access the character’s thoughts and feelings anytime. The findings provided the spectrum on the style of Malay author who was prone to use the modality which represents the character’s certainty and uncertainty towards the knowledge of omniscient author. Besides that, the research on the point of view through the modality element shows the ability of how the modality was applied by the author in portraying her attitude towards the idea and truth in narrative events. This study has contributed about the studies of point of view in Malay literature text in the view of stylistics.
Keywords: Point of view; modality; epistemic; stylistic; 7 Hari Mencintaiku
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdurahman. 2011. Teori modalitas sebagai materi pembelajaran bahasa indonesia. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Seni Unp. 2(1): 1-9.
Al-Alami. S. 2019. Point of view in narrative. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 9(8): 911-916
Anwar Ridhwan. 1985. Sudut Pandangan Dalam Cereka. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Asmah Hj. Omar. 2009. Nahu Melayu Mutakhir. Edisi kelima. Kuala Lumpur: DewanBahasa dan Pustaka.
Bloor, T. & Bloor. M. 1995. The Functional Analysis of English. London: Arnold.
Borgogni, D. 2016. “The Thick and Black Clouds of Obloquie’: Modality and point overview in Abiezer Coppe’s A Remonstrance. Open Linguistics (2): 636-649 Dan Shen. 2014. Stylistics and narratology. Dlm. The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, disunting oleh Burke, M., 191-205. London: Routledge.
Diasamidze, I. 2014. Point of view in narrative discourse. Procedia Social and BehavioralSciences 158: 160-165.
Fowler, R. 1979. Linguistics and the Novel. London: Methuen. Fowler, R. 1996. Linguistics Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Emike, J. 2014. A stylistic appraisal of ayi kwei armah’s the beautiful ones are not yet born. Global Journal of Human Social Science: Arts & Humanities – Physcology 14 (5): 1-9.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold
Haslina Haroon & Hasuria Che Omar. Kata bantu ragam dalam terjemahan Inggeris Melayu. Jurnal Bahasa 6 (2): 191-212.
Imran Ho Abdullah. 1993. The Semantics of The Modal Auxiliaries of Malay. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Iwamoto N. 2007. Modality and Point of View in Media Discourse. The Human Studies: Kanagawa University 173-200.
Leech, G. & Short, M. 1981. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Longman.
McIntyre, D. 2006. Point of View in Plays: A Cognitive Stylistics Approach to Viewpoint in Drama and Other Text-Types. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Mohammad Fadzeli Jaafar. 2006. Gaya hipotaksis dan parataksis: suatu analisis stilistik. Disertasi ijazah doktor falsafah. Fakulti Bahasa dan Linguistik, Universiti Malaya, Petaling Jaya, Selangor.
Mohammad Fadzeli Jaafar. 2013. Teori Sistemik-Fungsional dalam Stilistik. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohammad Fadzeli Jaafar. 2017. Stilistik dalam Cereka. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohammad Fadzeli Jaafar. 2021. Sudut pandangan dalam Cereka Melayu. Jurnal Bahasa 2(1): 23-40
Neary, C. 2014. Stylistics, Point of View and Modality. Dlm. The Routledge Handbook ofStylistics, disunting oleh Burke, M. New York. Routledge.
Palmer. F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Camridge University Palmer, F. R. 2003. Modality in english: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issue. Dlm. Modality in Contemporary English, disunting oleh R. Fachhinetti, M. Krug, Palmer, F., 1-17. Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
Parina, J.C. & Dasha De Leon, K. 2014. A stylistic analysis of the use of modality to identify the point of view in a short story. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies 20 (2): 91-101.
Short, M. 1996. Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose. London: Longman.
Simpson, P. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.
Simpson, P. 2004. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Tismo, S.B. 2008. Point of view in six matsumoto stories: A stylistic analysis. A Journal of Southern Phillipines 30 (1): 23-65.
Van Der Boom, I. 2009. Point of View in the Da Vinci Code: A stylistic analysis of the Da Vinci Code. http://www.pala. ac.uk/uploads/2/5/1/0/25105678/vanderbom2009.pdf [4 Julai 2017]
Verdonk, P. 2002. Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wales, K. 2001. A Dictionary of Stylistics. Harlow: Longman.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2289-1706 | e-ISSN : 2289-4268
Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu (ATMA)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor Darul Ehsan
MALAYSIA
© Copyright UKM Press, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia