The Utilisation Of Test-Taking Strategies Among Female Students In A Tertiary Institution

Asiah Jamil, Mohd Sallehhudin Abd. Aziz, Norizan Abdul Razak

Abstract


This article reports a study on test-taking strategies utilized by low and high proficiency female participants in an open-ended reading comprehension test. Based on purposive sampling, 10 students were selected from one tertiary institution. The study seeks to explore the test-taking strategies employed by female students of two levels of proficiency. Verbal reports from these participants were obtained via the retrospective protocol and playback sessions. The data provided information on participants’ thinking process and revealed how they arrived at their answers and the reasons for their choice of answers. The data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed qualitatively whereby patterns of strategies were identified and categorized. On the whole the results showed both levels employed almost the same total number of strategies, 24 and 22 for the high and low proficiency participants respectively. The conclusions were drawn upon the results of the data provided by limited number of participants and thus thrust aside the claim of representativeness in terms of test-taking strategy studies. However, the study allows a peek on the types of test-taking strategies utilized by students in the study which may also be employed by students in general.


Keywords


test-taking strategies, verbal reports, retrospective protocol, playback session, tertiary institution.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abanomey, Abdulaziz. (2002). The effects of texts’ authenticity on reading comprehension test-taking strategies used by adult Saudi learners of English as a foreign language. Unpublished Ph.D thesis. Arizona State University, Arizona.

Anderson, N. J., Bachman, L. F., Perkins, K. & Cohen, A. D. (1991). An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test triangulation of data sources. Language Testing, 8(1), 41-66.

Anderson, N. J. (1989). Reading comprehension tests versus academic readings: What are the second language readers doing? Unpublished Ph.D thesis. University of Texas, Austin, Texas.

Bachman, L. F. (2008). Language assessment opportunities and challenges. American Association for Applied Linguistics (1-85). (Online) Retrieved 9 December 2009, from File://F:gema referenceAAAL_filescache_002.htm.

Bachman, L. F. (2004). Theory of language assessment. Types of language assessment instrument. (Online) Retrieved 15 September 2004, from http://www.carla.umn.edu/assessment/VAC/research/theory.html

Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing, 17(1), 1-42.

Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.

Cohen, A. D. & Upton, T. A. (2007). ‘I want to go back to the text’: Response strategies on the reading subtest of the new TOEFL. Language Testing, 24 (2), 209-250.

Cohen, A. D. & Upton, T. A. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. TOEFL Monograph Series. ETS TOEFL.

Cohen, A. D. (2006). E-mail correspondence. (Online). Retrieved 29 January 2006, from http://webmail.tm.net.my/frame.html

Cohen, A. D. (2004). An interview with Andrew Cohen by Gholamreza Hajipour Nezhad. Japan Association for Language Teaching, Testing and Evaluation Special Interest Group, 8(1), 1-24.

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies and processes in test taking and SLA. In Bachman, L. F. & Cohen, A. D. (Ed). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. (pp. 90-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, A. D. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom (2nd ed). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Cohen, A. D. (1984). On taking language tests: What the students report. Language Testing, 1, 70-81.

Cohen, A. D. & Aphek, E. (1979). Easifying second language learning. Report in ERIC, ED163 753, 1-47.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge.

Feryal Cubukcu. (2007). An investigation of reading strategies employed by trainee teachers. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 7 (2), 95-110.

Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gordon, C. M. (1987). The effect of testing method on achievement in reading Comprehension tests in English as a foreign language. Unpublished M.A. Thesis.

Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University.

Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. (2006). The pratice of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.

Homburg, T. J., & Spaan, M. C. (1981). ESL Reading proficiency assessment: Testing strategies. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Ed.), On TESOL ’81 (pp. 25-33). Washington, DC: TESOL.

Ismail Sheikh Ahmad & Ratnawati Mohd Asraf. (2004). Making sense of test strategies used by good and average readers. The Reading Matrix, 4(1), 26-37.

Kern, R. G. (1989). Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. Modern Language Journal, 73(ii), 135-149.

McNamara, T. F. (2000). Language testing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Messick, S. 1989. Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement. (3rd ed). (pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.

Nevo, N. (1989). Test-taking strategies on a multiple-choice test of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 6(2), 199-215.

Phakiti, A. (2003a). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4), 649-702.

Phakiti, A. (2003b). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20 (1), 26-56.

Purpura, J. E. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate and Cambridge University Press.

Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Longman.

Shohamy, E. (1984). Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 1(2), 147-170.

Tsagari, C. (1994). Method effect on testing reading comprehension: How far can we go? Unpublished M.A. thesis. University of Lancaster, U.K.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021