Development Of An Automated Tool For Detecting Errors In Tenses
Abstract
The rapid growth of computer technologies creates a plethora of ways in which technology can be integrated into one of the alternatives to facilitate essay marking. Automated essay marking systems developed from the late 1960s have attempted to prove that computers can evaluate essays as competently as human expert. Several computer-based essay marking (CBEM) systems have been developed to mark students’ essays and they can be divided into semi-automated and automated systems. This paper illustrates the development of an Automated Tool for Detecting Errors in Tenses (ATDEiT™). The first phase analysed the errors found in 400 essays written by 112 English as second language (ESL) learners at tertiary level using Markin 3.1 software.
The results showed that the most common errors were found in tenses. This finding led to the second phase of the research, which was the design of an automated marking tool.
Consequently, the techniques and algorithm for error analysis marking tool for ESL learners were developed. An initial testing was conducted to evaluate the results of the
marking tool using 50 essays. Findings showed that ATDEiT™ achieved a high level (93.5%) of recall and an average level (78.8%) of precision. This proves that ATDEiT™ has the potential to be used as an automated tool for detecting errors in tenses for ESL learners.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah Mohd Zin, Saadiyah Darus, Mohd Jan Nordin & Abdul Malik Md. Yusoff.(2003). Using a coursework management system in language teaching.Teaching English with Technology, 3(1). (Online) Retrieved 5 March 2012,
from http://www.tewtjournal.org/pastissues2003.htm
Amoah, P., Lupiana, R., & Ghemri, L. (2006). A sentence analyzer and viewer for detecting grammatical errors. Texas Southern University Research Week.
Ang Leng Hong, Hajar Abdul Rahim, Tan Kim Hua, & Khazriyati Salehuddin. (2011).Collocations in Malaysian English learners` writing: A corpus-based error analysis, 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies,
(Special Issue), 31-44. CST’s Part-of-Speech Tagger. (Online) Retrieved 21 April 2012, from
http://www.cst.dk/online/pos_tagger/uk/index.html
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-culture aspect of second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferris, D. (2002) Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Foo, B., & Richards, C. (2004). English in Malaysia. RELC Journal, 35(2), 229-240.
Fox, R., & Bowden, M. (2002). Automated diagnosis of non-native English speaker’s natural language, Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligent (ICTA’02) (pp. 301-306).Holmes, M. Markin 3.1 Release 2 Build 7. Creative Technology. 1996-2004. (Online)
Retrieved 17 August 2007, from http://www.cict.co.uk/software/markin/
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use – Exploring error analysis. Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics and speech recognition.
Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural communication. Language Learning, 16(1 & 2), 1-20.
Kumar, A., & Nair, S. (2007). An artificial immune system based approach for English grammar checking, ICARIS 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4628 (pp. 348-357).
Lim, H. P. (1974). An error analysis of English compositions written by Malaysian speaking high school students. Unpublished M.A TESL thesis. University of California.
Marlyna Maros, Tan Kim Hua, & Khazriyati Salehuddin. (2007). Interference in learning English: grammatical errors in English essay writing among rural Malay secondary school students in Malaysia, Jurnal e-Bangi, 2(2), 1-15.
Marlyna Maros, Khazriyati Salehuddin, & Tan Kim Hua. (2007). Negative transfer in the learning of English: A case of grammatical errors in the writings of Malay secondary school students in Malaysia. Journal of Language and Linguistics,
(2), 18-33.
Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. TESL-EJ Journal. 6(2), A-1.
Naber, D. (2003). A rule based style and grammar checker. Diplomarbeit Thesis, Universitat Bielefeld.
Nazlia Omar, Nur Asma Razali & Saadiyah Darus (2009). Automated grammar checking of tenses for ESL writing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) 5589,
-482.
Page, E. B. (1994). Computer grading of student prose - Using modern concept and software. Journal of Experimental Education. 62,127-142.
Saadiyah Darus (1999). A prospect of automatic essay marking. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Language in the Global Context: Implications for
the Language Classroom, RELC. Singapore.
Saadiyah Darus. (2005). A framework of a CBEM system for ESL writing at institutions of higher learning in Malaysia. Unpublished Ph.D thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Saadiyah Darus & Kaladevi Subramaniam. (2009). Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students in Malaysia: A case study. European
Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 483-495.
Saadiyah Darus & Khor Hei Ching. (2009). Common errors in written English Essays of Form One Chinese students: A Case Study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 242-253.
Saadiyah Darus, Siti Hamin Stapa, Supyan Hussin & Koo Yew Lie. (2000). A survey of computer-based essay marking (CBEM) systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and ICT in the New Millennium,
Universiti Putra Malaysia: Faculty of Educational Studies (pp. 519-529).
Silva, T., & Matsuda, P. K. (2002). Writing. In N. Schmit (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
Siti Hamin Stapa & Mohd Mustafa Izahar. (2010). Analysis of errors in subject-verb agreement among Malaysian ESL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 16 (1),
-26.
Siti Hamin Stapa, Tengku Nor Rizan Tg Mohd Maasum, Rosniah Mustaffa & Saadiyah Darus (2008). Workplace written literacy and its effect on the curriculum.GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies, 8(1), 23-33.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
Ying, H.W., & Chih, H. L. (2003). Two intelligent applications support English distance learning, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshop. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D. C.,
USA.
Zanakis, S. H. & Evans, J. R. (1981). Heuristics ‘optimization’: Why, when and how to use it. Interfaces. 11(5), 84-91.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2131
ISSN : 1675-8021