Relationship between Teacher’s Personality, Monitoring, Learning Environment, and Students’ EFL Performance

Nik Mohd Hazrul Nik Hashim, Syed Shah Alam, Norazlina Mohd Yusoff

Abstract


Teachers have been widely acknowledged to critically influence students’ learning and achievement. Nonetheless, the effects of teacher characteristics on student communication proficiency in the context of English as foreign language (EFL) learning have not received adequate attention among scholars. In contrast to most studies in the area, this article focuses on the influence of teacher-student interpersonal engagements, namely teacher’s personality and monitoring, on EFL student communication proficiency. The purpose of this study is to explore whether teacher’s characteristics and environmental learning factors influence students’ overall communication proficiency. Drawing on sociocultural theory, the authors assume that EFL learning is bi-directional in nature. In addition to conceptualizing the direct impact of domain-specific determinants of communication proficiency, internal classroom conditions and external college facilities were assessed for possible moderating effects. Using a sample of college students in twelve different campus locations from Institut Kemahiran Mara (IKM), across Malaysia, the authors performed a regression analysis to empirically test the proposed research hypotheses. All constructs demonstrated low levels of multicollinearity and measurement scales indicated sufficient reliability and validity. Results show that teacher’s personality is an important determinant of student proficiency in English. Monitoring efforts, however, did not have a direct influence on English proficiency but coupled with teacher’s personality and college facilities, respectively, the coefficient interaction effects became significant. The results also reveal that classroom conditions do not interact with teacher’s personality to improve student learning outcomes, nonetheless acts more predominantly as a predictor that directly enhances students’ learning. Important research implications and future research directions are suggested.

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1401-07

 


Keywords


collaborative interaction; communication proficiency; learning environment; teacher characteristic; moderating effects

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbari, R. & Allvar, N. K. (2010). Teacher characteristics as predictors of student’s academic achievement. The Electronic Journal for English as Second Language. 13(4), 1-10.

Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 16, 74-94.

Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education. 23, 731-747.

Cummunis, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language Learning: Insights for learners, Teachers, and Researchers. New York: Newbury House Publication.

Danielson, C. (2002). Enhancing Student Achievement: A framework for School Improvement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Beauregard Street: Alexandria.

Faltis, C. & Hudelson, S. (1994). Learning English as an additional language in K-12 schools. TESOL Quarterly. 28, 257-468.

Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation. 28(2), 465-498.

Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom Environment. Croom Helm Curriculum Policy and Research Series. Beckamham: Provident House.

Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 37(2), 247-273.

Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching: Surveying the evidence on student achievement and teacher’ characteristics. Education Next. 2(1), 50-55.

Hair, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multiple Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International.

Havita, N. (2000). Teaching for effective learning in higher education. Dordercht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.

Hong, Nam Kyungsim & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language-learning strategies use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System. 34, 399-415.

Hoxby, C. M. (2000). The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 115(3), 1239-1285.

Lackney, J. A. (1999). Assessing School Facilities for Learning/Assessing the Impact of the Physical Environment on the Educational Process. Mississippi State, Miss.: Educational Design Institute.

Lowe, J. M. (1990). The Interface between Educational Facilities and Learning Climate in Three Elementary Schools. Ph.D thesis, College Station, Texas A&M University.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing Student Outcome: Performance Assessment using the Dimensions of Learning. Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab, Aurora, CO.

Molnar, A., Smith, P., Zahorik, J., Palmer, A., Halback, A. & Ehrle, K. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 21(2), 165-177.

Moncada, A. G. & Ortiz, D. I. Q. (2003). Tomorrow's EFL teacher educators. Colombian Applied Linguistic Journal. 5, 86-104.

Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. London: Routledge.

Noor Hashimah Abdul Aziz. (2007). ESL students’ perspectives on language anxiety. Ph.D Thesis. University Putra Malaysia: Serdang.

Normazidah Che Musa, Lie, Koo Yew & Hazita Azman. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 12(1), 35-51.

Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist. 22, 155-175.

Oxford, R. L. (1996). Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. Applied Language Learning. 7(1), 25-45.

Oxford, R. & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal. 78, 12-28.

Patricia, G., Julie, M. & Anne, D. (2005). Listening to the teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute: UC Berkley.

Rosniah, Mustaffa. (2006). The effects of culture on students’ learning style. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature®, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 12, 83-94.

Sadeghi, K. & Nikou, S. B. (2012). Perception of Iranian high school EFL teachers and students toward teaching and learning reading skill. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature®, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 18(4), 167-180.

Schneider, M. (2002). Do School Facilities Affect Academic Outcomes? Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.

Sronge, J. H., Tucker, P. D. & Hindman, J. L. (2004). Handbook for Qualities of Effective Teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wilson, S. M. & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of Learning and Teaching: What do they Mean for Educators? Best Practice: National Education Association.

Yihong, Gao, Yuan, Zhao, Ying, Cheng & Yan, Zhou. (2007). Relationship between English learning motivation types and self-identity changes among Chinese students. TESOL Quarterly. 41(1), 133-151.

Zhang, Qunying. & Watkins, David. (2007). Conception of a good tertiary EFL teacher in China. TESOL Quarterly. 41(4), 781-790.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021