The Effect of Linguistic Context on EFL Vocabulary Learning

Karim Sadeghi, Aysan Nobakht

Abstract


There is limited literature on the role of linguistic context in learning and remembering new vocabulary items by EFL learners. To fill this gap in literature and to further explore the relationship between surrounding linguistic context and learning, and retention of new words, this study was set out to investigate whether systematically changing the amount of surrounding context has any significant effect on learning and retention of new vocabulary items. Forty-seven Iranian female advanced EFL learners within the age range of 18-24 were employed in this study and were taught 100 new vocabulary items (unknown words) in ten sessions and in three different contextual conditions (i.e., 1. one known word, one unknown/new word; 2. two known words, one unknown/new word; and 3. three known words, one unknown/new word). Known words for contextual conditions were selected from the previous units of World Pass which the participants had covered before. Furthermore, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary was used for some of the contexts. The researchers made an attempt to use simple and high-frequency words from the units covered and/or from the dictionary. The results of one-way ANOVA for both immediate and delayed post-tests revealed that extending the number of known words (that is, adding to the amount of surrounding linguistic context) does not have any significant effect on learning and retention of new vocabulary items. It can be claimed that two or three known words context is still as small as one word context and they do not have differing contextual roles. Further results and implications are discussed in the paper.

 

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403-05

 


Keywords


contextual conditions; EFL; known words; unknown words; vocabulary learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atay, D., &Ozbulgan, C. (2007). Memory Strategy Instruction, Contextual Learning and ESP Vocabulary Recall. English for Specific Purposes. 26, 9-51.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Nasrollahy Shahry, N. M. (2011). The Effect of Three Consecutive Context Sentences on EFL Vocabulary-Learning. TESL Canada Journal. 28(2), 74-89.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Moladust, E. (2012). An Investigation of Teacher-Provided versus Student-Made Vocabulary Notebooks. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature®, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 18(4), 75-89.

Bruton, A. (2007). Vocabulary Learning from Dictionary Reference in Collaborative EFL Translational Writing. System. 35, 353-367.

Christ, T., Wang, C. X., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). Using Story Dictation to Support Young Children’s Vocabulary Development: Outcomes and Process. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 26, 30-41.

Çiftçi, H., & Üster, S. (2009). A Comparative Analysis of Teaching Vocabulary in Context and by Definition. Proceedia Social and Behavioral Science. 1, 1568-1572.

Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of Variable Encoding and Spaced Presentation on Vocabulary Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 79(1), 62-70.

Doosti, M. (2012). The Effect of Length of Exposure to CALL Technology on Young Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary and Grammar Gain. MA Thesis, English language Department. Urmia University.

Eckerth, J., &Tavakoli, P. (2012). The Effects of Word Exposure Frequency and Elaboration of Word Processing on Incidental L2 Vocabulary Acquisition Through Reading. Language Teaching Research.

, 227-252.

Engelbart, M. S., Theuerkauf, B. (1999). Defining Context within Vocabulary Acquisition. Language Teaching Research. 3(1), 57-69.

Erten, H. I., & Tekin, M. (2008). Effects on Vocabulary Acquisition of Presenting New Words in Semantic Sets versus Semantically Unrelated Sets. System. 36, 407-422.

Foil, R. C., & Alber, R. S. (2002). Fun and Effective Ways to Build Your Students’ Vocabulary. Intervention in School and Clinic. 37(3), 131-139.

Hashemi, R. M., & Gowdasiaei, F. (2005). An Attribute-treatment Interaction Study: Lexical-Set versus Semantically-unrelated Vocabulary Instruction. RELC Journal. 36, 341-361.

Hoai Huong, L. P. (2006). Learning Vocabulary in Group Work in Vietnam. RELC Journal. 37 (1), 105-121.

Huang, M. Y., Huang, M. Y., Huang, H. S., & Lin, T.Y. (2012). A Ubiquitous English Vocabulary Learning System: Evidence of Active/passive Attitudes vs. Usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers and Education. 58, 273-282.

Kasahara, K. (2010). Are Two Words Better than One for Intentional Vocabulary Learning? Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan. 21, 91-100.

Kasahara, K. (2011). The Effect of Known-and-unknown Word Combinations on Intentional Vocabulary Learning. System. 39, 491-499.

Krashen, S. D. (1989). We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Edition Evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal. 73, 440-464.

Laufer, B., Shmueli, K. (1997). Memorizing New Words: Does Teaching have Anything to do with it? RELC Journal. 28, 89-108.

Lee Luan, N., & Sappathy, M. S. (2011). L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: The Impact of Negotiated Interaction. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 11(2), 5-20.

McDaniel, M. A., & Pressley, M. (1989). Keyword and Context Instruction of New Vocabulary Meanings: Effects on Text Comprehension and Memory. Journal of Educational Psychology. 81(2), 204-213.

McKeown, M. G. (1985). The Acquisition of Word Meaning from Context by Children of High and Low Ability. Reading Research Quarterly. 20(4), 482-496.

Milton, J. (2009). Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Nation, I. S. P., & Coady, J. (1988). Vocabulary and Reading. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.). Vocabulary and Language Teaching (pp. 97-110). New York: Longman.

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.

Prince, P. (1996). Second Language Vocabulary Learning: The Role of Context versus Translation as a Function of Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal. 80, 478-493.

Richards, C. J., & Rodgers, S. T. (2001). Approaches and Method in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rodriguez, M., & Sadowski, M. (2000). Effects of Rote, Context, Keyword, and Context/Keyword Methods on Retention of Vocabulary in EFL Classrooms. Language Learning Journal. 50(2), 385-412.

Sadeghi, K., & Abdollahzadeh, D. (2012). The Role of Context in the Performance of Iranian EFL Learners in Vocabulary Tests. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2(6), 1236-1242.

Schatz, E. K. (1984). The Influence of Context Clues in Determining the Meaning of Low-Frequency Words in Naturally Occurring Prose. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Miami. Retrieved November 12, 2010, from http://www. scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/dissertations/1396/

Schouten-van Parreren, M. C. (1989). Vocabulary Learning through Reading: Which Conditions should be Met When Presenting Words in Texts? AILA Review. 6, 75-85.

Stempleski, S., Douglas, N., Morgan, R. J., & Johannsen, L. K. (2007). World Pass. India: Thomson.

Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Webb, S. (2007). Learning Word Pairs and Glossed Sentences: The Effects of a Single Context on Vocabulary Knowledge. Language Teaching Research. 11(1), 63-81.

Webb, S. (2008). The Effects of Context on Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Reading in a Foreign Language. 20(2), 32-245.

Webb, S. (2009). The Effects of Receptive and Productive Learning of Word Pairs on Vocabulary Knowledge. RELC Journal. 40(3), 360-376.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2006). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021