VLS Model for Content Words: An Experimental Study on Engineering Students in India

Uma Maheswari Viswanathan, A. Shahin Sultana

Abstract


The resurgence of interest in vocabulary learning in the past two decades and research in Vocabulary Learning Strategies (VLS) since Schmitt’s 1997 taxonomy have yielded a few other taxonomies and strategies to enrich the vocabulary of ESL learners. However, developing a VLS taxonomy or Model in ESP context has not been focused upon though the need for it has been studied and reported. Students from vernacular medium schools in ESL and EFL countries find it difficult to learn the content in colleges due to their limited knowledge of content vocabulary. Hence a new VLS Model for content words has been designed to render linguistic assistance to them. The efficacy of the Model has been tested in the context of Engineering Science. The proposed model is unique and specific for deriving strategies to learn content vocabulary in all branches of Science and Engineering. There is scope for diachronic, synchronic, and scientific study of words through Cognitive and Metacognitive strategies. Activities generated on this Model combine decontextualized Discovery strategy and contextualized Consolidation strategy. Eighty engineering college students in India took part in the study. The experimental group which received intervention based on the VLS Model outperformed the control group in the posttest. Hence this Model is advocated for enhancing the knowledge and use of ESP vocabulary and for helping learners understand their disciplinary field. It is believed that through appropriate VLS, the learners can be empowered to be autonomous in reading.

 


Keywords


VLS Model; Content words; ESP; Engineering Science; L2 learners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, G. M. A. (2013). Strategies and approaches for teaching and learning of medical terminology. International Journal of English and Education. Vol. 2(2), 225-241.

Akbari, Z. & Tahririan, M. H. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies in an ESP context: The case of para/medical English in Iran. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly. Vol. 11(1), 39-61.

Akil, M. A. & Rosida, A. (2018). The application of semantic feature analysis as a strategy to enrich students’ vocabulary. Journal of Advanced English Studies. Vol. 1(2), 12-20.

Amer, A. (2002). Advanced vocabulary instruction in EFL. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol. 3(11).

Amirian, S. M. R. & Heshmatifar, Z. (2013). A survey on vocabulary learning strategies: A case of Iranian EFL university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 4(3), 636-641.

Amiryousefi, M. (2015). Iranian EFL teachers and learners' beliefs about vocabulary learning and teaching. SAGE Open https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015581382

Bernardo, A.S. & Gonzales, H.T. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Filipino college students across five disciplines. TESOL Journal. Vol. 1, 17-27.

Bogaards, P. & Laufer, B. (2004). Vocabulary in a Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Brahler, C. J. & Walker, D. (2008). Learning scientific and medical terminology with a mnemonic strategy using an illogical association technique. Advances in Physiology and Education. Vol. 12, 219–224.

Brown, P. S. (2012). Innovating a vocabulary learning strategies program. In Muller, T., Herder, S., Adamson, J. & Brown, P. S. (Eds.), Innovating EFL Teaching in Asia, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan

Chamot, A. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 25, 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061

Craik F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present and future? Memory. Vol. 10 (5/6), 305-318.

Craik, F. & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior. Vol. 11, 671-684.

Gu, P. Y. (2003). Fine brush and freehand: The vocabulary-learning art of two successful Chinese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 37, 73-104.

Hirsh, H. L. (2003). Essential Communication Strategies for Scientists, Engineers and Technology Professionals. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press, xi-15.

Klapper, J. (2008). Deliberate and incidental: Vocabulary learning strategies in independent second language learning. In Hurd, S., Lewis, T. (Eds.), Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings (pp. 159-178). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Kusumawati, E. & Utami, W. (2017). The effects of vocabulary instructions on students’reading comprehension across cognitive styles in ESP. Journal of education and Practice. Vol. 8(2).

Little, A. & Kobayashi, K. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategies of Japanese life science students. TESOL Journal. Vol. 6(1), 81-111.

Nassaji, H. (2004). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners' lexical inferencing strategy use and success. Canadian Modern Language Review . Vol. 61, 107-134.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching Vocabulary: Strategies and Techniques. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.

Nilforoushan, S. (2012). The effect of teaching vocabulary through semantic mapping on EFL learners’ awareness of the affective dimensions of deep vocabulary knowledge. English Language Teaching. Vol. 5(10). doi: 10.5539/elt.v5n10p164

Oxford, R. & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal. Vol. 73(4), 404-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/326876

Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle: Heinle Publishers.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Peacock, M. & Ho, B. (2003), Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Vol. 13, 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00043

Perfetti, C. & Joseph Stafura (2014). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading. Vol. 18(1), 22-37. DOI:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687

Qian, D. D. & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing. Vol. 21, 28–52. DOI:10.1191/0265532204lt273oa

Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing. Vol. 10, 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F026553229301000308

Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In Kunnan, A. (Ed.). Validation in Language Assessment (pp. 41-60). Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Rubin, J. & Thompson, I. (1994). How to be a More Successful Language Learner: Toward Learner Autonomy. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary Learning Strategies. In Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning. Vol. 64, 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077

Seddigh, F. & Shokrpur, N. (2012). Vocabulary learning strategies of medical students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. English Language Teaching Journal. Vol. 5(2), 160–173.

doi:10.5539/elt.v5n2p160

Segler, T.M. Pain, H. & Sorace, A. (2001). Second language vocabulary acquisition and LS in ICALL environments. [Online]. Accessed at http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/s9808690/finalpaper2.pdf (30.4.2006)

Sinadinović, D. (2013). The importance of strategies in learning and acquiring medical English vocabulary. JAHR. Vol. 4(7), 273–291.

Smith, E. & Chris, J. (2014). Grouping, semantic relation and imagery effects in individuals with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities. Vol. 35(11), 3162-3174.

Sulaiman, N. A., Salehuddin, K. & Khairuddin, R. (2018). Academic word list knowledge of Malaysian ESL undergraduates. GEMA® Online Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 18(4), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1804-01

The India Skills Report. (2014). accessed at https://wheebox.com/logo/SummarizedVersion.pdf

Tran, T. H. (2011). EFL Teachers' Perceptions about Vocabulary Acquisition and Instruction. (Doctoral Dissertation, Alliant International University, San Diego, CA). Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/docview/880629010/37F7DF0A85954E24PQ/1?accountid=14594

Viswanathan, U. M. & Shahin, S. (2018). An Indian ESWL: A pedagogic tool to improve the lexical competency of students in context of horizontal diversity. The Asian EFL Journal. Vol. 20(4), 23-38.

Xue, G. & Nation, I. S. P. (1984). A university word list. Language Learning and Communication. Vol. 3, 215–229.

Zarei, A. A. & Elekaie, A. (2012). Learner Autonomy and Language Learning Strategies: An Empirical Analysis. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Zahedi, Y. & Abdi, M. (2012). The impact of imagery on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Procedia- Social and behavioral Sciences. Vol. 69, 2264- 2272.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1901-04

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021