Analysis of Negotiation Episodes in Foreign Language Learner Interactions

Hazleena Baharun, Haliza Harun, Juliana Othman

Abstract


In second/foreign language learning, it is hypothesised oral interaction facilitates language acquisition. Studies show that one aspect of interaction that promotes second/foreign language acquisition is through the process of negotiation, and one factor that influences interaction is the task or activity that learners are engaged in. Hence, it is the aim of this study to investigate if foreign language (FL) learners would engage in different negotiation strategies when completing different communication task types. Nine FL learners from a tertiary EFL class in groups of three participated in the study. They completed three different communication task types (i.e., information gap, jigsaw and decision-making) over a period of four weeks. Data for the study comprised transcribed recordings of the groups’ oral interaction. This study qualitatively examined FL learners’ oral interactions when engaged in three different types communication tasks. Data collected were analysed for instances of negotiation. Findings revealed that the different communication tasks elicited negotiation episodes as the participants engaged in task completion. They applied similar negotiation strategies during peer interaction. However, further scrutiny revealed that there were differences in terms of the depth of negotiation for the different communication task types. The results of this study exhibit evidence that language communication tasks do promote meaningful interactions among tertiary EFL learners. Data clearly showed widespread negotiation episodes during task completion. The knowledge on the types of communication tasks that can promote meaningful interaction and negotiation episodes can assist language practitioners to make informed decisions on tasks that are suitable for their learners.

 


Keywords


oral interaction; communication task types; negotiation of meaning; negotiation strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baharun, H. (2015). EFL learners’ task-generated interactive discourse. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Malaya, Malaysia.

Baharun, H., Sidek, H.M., M.M. Idrus, N.S.M. Saad, (2016). Task-Based Language Learning: Investigating the Dynamic of Learners’ Oral Interaction. International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences. Vol. 2(5), 570-580.

Baharun, H. & Zakaria, A. R. (2017). Enhancing EFL Learners’ Language Development Through Collaborative Tasks, Advanced Science Letters. Vol. 23(3), 2083-2087.

Basturkmen, H. (2002). Negotiating Meaning in Seminar-type Discussion and EAP. English for Specific Purposes. Vol. 21, 233-242.

Crabbe, D. (2007). Learning Opportunities: Adding Learning Value to Tasks. ELT Journal. Vol. 61(2), 117-125.

Crossley, S., Kyle, K. & Salsbury, T. (2016). A Usage‐Based Investigation of L2 Lexical Acquisition: The Role of Input and Output. The Modern Language Journal. Vol. 100(3), 702-715.

Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based Research and Pedagogy. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 4(3), 193-220.

Eslami, Z. R. & Kung, W. T. (2016). Focus-on-form and Efl Learners’ Language Development in Synchronous Computer-mediated Communication: Task-based Interactions. The Language Learning Journal. Vol. 44(4), 401-417.

Fernandez Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative Dialogue in Learner-learner and Learner-native Speaker Interaction. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 33(3), 229-256.

Fondo Garcia, M. & Appel, C. (2016). Synchronous Tandem Language Learning in a MOOC Context: A Study on Task Design and Learner Performance. Research-publishing. net.

Foster, P. & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for Meaning and Peer Assistance in Second Language Classrooms. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 26(3), 402-430.

García Mayo, M. D. P. & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Task Repetition and Its Impact on EFL Children’s Negotiation of Meaning Strategies and Pair Dynamics: an Exploratory Study. The Language Learning Journal. Vol. 44(4), 451-466.

James, H. (2005). Finding Meaning in the Second Half of Life: How to Finally, Really Grow Up. New York, NY: Gotham Books.

Jeong, Nam-Sook. (2011). The effects of task type and group structure on meaning negotiation in synchronous computer-mediated communication. In L. Plonsky & M. Scheirloh (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2009 Second Language Research Forum. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceeding Project.

Kaivanpanah, S. & Miri, M. (2017). The Effects of Task Type on the Quality of Resolving Language‐Related Episodes and Vocabulary Learning. TESOL Journal.

Kumpulainen, K. & Wray, D. (Eds). (2002). Classroom Interaction and Social Learning: From Theory to Practice. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.

Kurhila, S. & Kotilainen, L. (2017). Cooking, Interaction and Learning: the Finnish Digital Kitchen as a Language Learning Environment. Task-Based Language Learning in a Real-World Digital Environment: The European Digital Kitchen, 157.

Lan, Y. J., Kan, Y. H., Sung, Y. T. & Chang, K. E. (2016). Oral-performance Language Tasks for CSL Beginners in Second Life. Language Learning and Technology. Vol. 20(3), 60-79.

Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistic and Conversational Adjustments to Nonnative Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Vol. 5, 177-193.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Language Acquisition: Second Language Acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 413-468). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Long, M. H. (2011). Instructed SLA (I): Towards a cognitive interactionist theory of instructed adult SLA. In workshop on second language research. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Studies University.

Long, M. H. (2017). Interaction in L2 Classrooms. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching.

Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.). Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Luan, N. L. & Sappathy, S. M. (2011). L2 vocabulary acquisition: The impact of negotiated interaction. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 11(2), 5-20.

Ma, S., Anderson, R. C., Lin, T. J., Zhang, J., Morris, J. A., Nguyen-Jahiel, K. & Grabow, K. (2017). Instructional Influences on English Language Learners' Storytelling. Learning and Instruction. Vol. 49, 64-80.

Mackey, A. (2007). Interaction as practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives From Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Martin-Beltrán, M. (2017). Exploring Peer Interaction Among Multilingual Youth: New Possibilities and Challenges for Language and Literacy Learning. International Multilingual Research Journal, Vol. 11(3), 131-136.

Mayo, M. D. P. G. & Ibarrola, A. L. (2015). Do Children Negotiate for Meaning in Task-based Interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL Settings. System. Vol. 54, 40-54.

Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A. & Van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of Meaning in Conversational and Information Gap Activities: A Comparative Discourse Analysis. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 35(3), 377-405.

Nassaji, H. & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and Individual Output Tasks and Their Effects on Learning English Phrasal Verbs. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 14(4), 397-419.

Omar, R. C. & Kaur, J. (2017). Penggunaan Strategi Komunikasi dalam Rutin Perundingan Makna (The Use of Communication Strategies in Negotiation of Meaning Routine). GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 17(1), 203-222

Philp, J. & Iwashita, N. (2013). Talking, Tuning in and Noticing: Exploring the Benefits of Output in Task-based Peer Interaction. Language Awareness. Vol. 22(4), 353-370.

Pica, T. (1991). Classroom Interaction, Participation, and Comprehension: Redefining Relationships. System. Vol. 19, 437-454.

Pica, T. (2005). Classroom Learning, Teaching, and Research: a Task-based Perspective. The Modern Language Journal. Vol. 89(3), 339-352.

Pica, T., Kanagy, R. & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction. In Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (Eds.), Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Rouhshad, A., Wigglesworth, G. & Storch, N. (2016). The Nature of Negotiations in Face-to-face Versus Computer-mediated Communication in Pair Interactions. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 20(4), 514-534.

Sato, M. & Ballinger, S. (Eds.). (2016). Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical Potential and Research Agenda (Vol. 45). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Shimamura, K. (2015). A Qualitative Approach to Investigate Japanese EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in English: Stages of Research Methods. Bulletin of the Institute of Foreign Language Education Kurume University. Vol. 22, 1-23.

Tai, Y., Ting, Y. L. & Hsieh, P. S. (2016, October). Improving Students’ English Technical Terms Learning and Willingness to Communicate Through Meaning Negotiation. In International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education (pp. 195-204). Springer, Cham.

Watanabe, Y. & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of Proficiency Differences and Patterns of Pair Interaction on Second Language Learning: Collaborative Dialogue Between Adult ESL Learners. Language Teaching Research. Vol. 11(2), 121- 142.

Yi, B. & Sun, Z. (2013). An empirical study of the effectiveness of negotiation of meaning in L2 vocabulary acquisition of Chinese learners of English. English Language Teaching. Vol. 6(10), 120-131.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1802-14

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021