“Anonymous Collectivity” and “Sly Civility”: Postcolonial Defiance in a Satirical Short Story by Aziz Nesin

Ahad Mehrvand, Javad Khorsandi

Abstract


Until a few years ago, Turkey was usually seen as irrelevant to colonial studies owing to its non-colonial status. More recently, however, there has been a more flexible approach to considering the possibility of studying modern Turkey under the heading of postcolonial studies. By acknowledging the socio-political similarities between Turkey and colonized countries, the current study employs a postcolonial framework to analyze a short story by a Turkish author. In doing so, Aziz Nesin’s “Don’t you have any Donkeys in your Country?” is studied to show how Nesin contributes to the political and socio-economic status of Modern Turkey and the highlighted controversy over the applicability of postcolonial perspectives to the Turkish context. The present study draws upon Albert Memmi’s notion of “anonymous collectivity” and Homi K. Bhabha’s “sly civility” as postcolonial means of indirect defiance, to identify the ways in which the narrative contributes to its contemporary milieu. We argue that throughout the story Nesin satirizes the so-called expert colonizer for his fundamentally false assumption about the naïveté of the colonized nation. The story reflects that although the Turkish peasant has unconsciously internalized the colonialist ideology of “anonymous collectivity,” the very same indirect means of defiance is consciously used by the peasant to overcome inequality and white supremacy in the sphere of selling Turkish carpets as one of the most prestigious products to the Western world. This study contributes to the literature on postcolonialism, first by raising the possibility of including modern Turkey in postcolonial studies, and then by examining Nesin’s response towards the postcolonial-like ideology whereby it is concluded that oppression creates contradictions in the ostensible colonized/colonizer, impairing and reversing both groups’ identity and humanity. We also conclude that the narrative reverses the dominant ideologies of clever and knowledgeable Americans by giving voice to a subaltern Turkish peasant whose goal is to resist the enduring effects of economic and cultural oppression. 

 


Keywords


Albert Memmi; “anonymous collectivity”; Aziz Nesin; Homi K. Bhabha; “sly civility”

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahiska, Meltem. (2003). Occidentalism: The Historical Fantasy of the Modern. The South Atlantic Quarterly. Vol. 102(2-3), 364-365. doi:10.1215/00382876.

Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths & Helen Tiffin. (2002). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-colonial Literatures. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

Barlas, Asma. (2004). Islam, Muslims, and the US: Essays on Religion and Politics. New Delhi: Global Media Publications.

Bhabha, Homi K. (1984). Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse. October. Vol. 28(1), 125-133. doi:10.2307/778467.

Bhabha, Homi K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Boehmer, Elleke. (1995). Colonial and Postcolonial Literature: Migrant Metaphors. Oxford: OUP.

Bozarslan, Hamit. (2008). “Turkey: Postcolonial Discourse in a Non-Colonised State.” In A Historical Companion to Postcolonial Literatures – Continental Europe and its Empires, edited by Prem Poddar, Rajeev S.

Patke, and Lars Jensen, 423–427. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Cengiz, Orhan Kemal. (2008). Turkey and the World Around It: From a Democracy and Human Rights Perspective. Ankara: Liberte Publishing.

Elhadj, Elie. (2006). The Islamic Shield: Arab Resistance to Democratic and Religious Reforms. Boca Raton, FL: Brown Walker.

Erçel, Erkan. (2016). Psychoanalysis, Fantasy, Postcoloniality: Turkish Nationalism and Historiography in Post-Ottoman Turkey. Postcolonial Studies. Vol. 19(1), 71-87. doi: 10.1080/13688790.

Erdoğan, Barış. (2015). Reproduction of Post-Colonial Mental Codes in Modern Turkey. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 2(1), 125-141. doi: 10.17336/igusbd.14781.

Fanon, Frantz. (1963). Wretched of the Earth, Translated and edited by Constance Farrington. New York, Grove Press.

Fuchs, Anne. (1999). A Space of Anxiety: Dislocation and Abjection in Modern German-Jewish -Literature. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Halman, Talât S. (2009). A Millennium of Turkish Literature: A Concise History. 2nd ed. Ankara: Ministry of Culture and Tourism.

Lin, Yi, and Bailey Forrest. (2014). Systemic Structure behind Human Organizations: From Civilizations to Individuals. New York: Springer.

McEwan, Cheryl. (2014). Postcolonialism. In Vandana Desai & Rob Potter (Eds.). The Companion to Development Studies (pp. 139-141). New York: Routledge.

Mehrvand, Ahad. (2009). Thomas Bigger’s Reaction to ‘Anonymous Collectivity’ to Richard Wright’s Native Son. Indian Journal of Postcolonial Literatures. Vol. 9(1), 52-62.

Mehrvand, Ahad. (2012). Postcolonial Aspects of Susan Glaspell’s Trifles. Research in Contemporary World Literature. Vol. 17(3), 55-76.

Mehrvand, Ahad. (2016). A Postcolonial Reading of Amiri Baraka’s 21st Century Political Poem on America. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies. Vol. 4(4), 21-29.

Memmi, Albert. (1990). The Colonizer and the Colonized. London: Eartscan.

Moore-Gilbert, Bart. (1997). Postcolonial Theory: Contexts, Practices, Politics. London: Verso.

Nesin, Mehmed Nusret. (1998). Don’t You have any Donkeys in Your Country? In Carol Johnson Shedd & Louis Mitler (Ed.). Are You Listening?: Voices from the Middle East (pp. 6-101). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tiryakioglu, Nevsal Olcen. (2015). The Western Image of Turks from the Middle Ages to the 21st Century: The Myth of ‘Terrible Turk’ And ‘Lustful Turk.’ 1st ed. [ebook] Nottingham. Retrieve 16 March, 2017 from http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/27946/

Ünlü Bilgiç, Tuba. (2015). The Roots of Anti-Americanism in Turkey 1945-1960. Bilig. 72(4), 251-280. doi: 10.12995/bilig.2015.7211

Zeiny, Esmaeil & Noraini Md Yusof. (2016). The Said and Not-Said: New Grammar of Visual Imperialism. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 16(1), 125-141.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1802-03

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021