Aktiviti Pengaturan Menggunakan Zone of Proximal Development dalam Menstruktur Ayat Bahasa Sepanyol

Shahril Ismail, Shu Sim Tam

Abstract


Kebanyakan kajian yang bersandarkan konsep Zone of Proximal Development (Vygotsky, 1978) memberi fokus kepada kolaborasi bersama pakar. Reka bentuk kajian kebanyakannya menggunakan penyelidikan ujian pra dan pos. Malah, hasil kajian juga hanya menjelaskan peningkatan potensi pelajar melalui keberkesanan interaksi dan kolaborasi yang dilalui pelajar sepanjang melaksanakan tugasan yang diberi. Manakala proses mental iaitu proses pengantaraan dan aktiviti pengaturan yang berlaku semasa pelajar berinteraksi dan berkolaborasi dengan pakar tidak dipaparkan. Malah dalam senario di mana pelajar yang mempelajari bahasa asing di Malaysia (khususnya bahasa Sepanyol), kebanyakan masa mereka melaksanakan tugasan bertulis mengikut kesesuaian sendiri dan tanpa bantuan pakar atau guru. Bagaimana pelajar sebegini menyelesaikan masalah semasa menstruktur ayat bahasa Sepanyol tanpa kehadiran pakar dan apakah aktiviti pengaturan yang berlaku semasa proses menstruktur dijalankan  adalah perkara yang belum dikaji? Menggunakan kaedah Think Aloud Protocol (TAP) ke atas 72 pelajar bahasa Sepanyol tahap asas (novis), bukan sahaja berupaya memaparkan bentuk penggunaan pengantaraan, malah dapat menunjukkan representasi proses mental aktiviti memperoleh leksikal dan sintaksis serta aktiviti pengaturan semasa pelajar menstruktur ayat. Kajian ini berupaya menunjukkan bentuk aktiviti pengaturan daripada bantuan Google Translate, rakan dan buku semasa pelajar menstruktur ayat. Kajian juga memaparkan, tanpa kehadiran pakar atau guru, pelajar masih berupaya mencapai tahap pengaturan kendiri / self-regulation melalui bantuan yang diperoleh daripada Google Translate, rakan dan buku walaupun pengetahuan bahasa Sepanyol mereka di tahap novis.

 

DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1603-11


Keywords


teori sosio-budaya (SCT); zone of proximal development (ZPD); pengantaraan; pengaturan; proses menstruktur ayat

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative Feedback As Regulation and Second Language Learning in the Zone of Proxial Development. The Modern Language Journal. 78, 465-483.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky's Analysis of Learning and Instruction. (Dlm.). Kozulin, A. , Gindis, B. , Ageyev, V. S., Miller, S (Pnyt.). Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural

Context (hlm. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Che Wan Ida Rahimah Che Wan Ibrahim. , Prain, V. & Collet, P. (2014). Percieved Learning Strategies of Malaysian University Students in Web 2.0-based English as a Second Language Informal Learning. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 14(1), 29- 42.

Cheah, T. T., Adlan, A., Nadeson, B., & Lim, C. L. (2001). Keberkesanan Kaedah Pembelajaran Koperatif Dalam Pembelajaran Bacaan Pemahaman Teks Di Kalangan Murid Sjk (C) Dan Sjk (T). Dicapai Disember, 2015, daripada http:// www. ipsah.edu.my/Laman R&D2007/Kajian Pemantauan BPG

De Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social-Cognitive Dimensions of Interaction in L2 Peer Revision. The Modern Language Journal. 78(4), 484 - 496.

De Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. S. (2000) Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision. The Modern Language Journal. 84, 51- 68.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective Scalffolding in Second Language Learning (Dlm) Lantolf, J.P. & Appel, G. (Pnyt.). Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing Learner Language. Oxford University Press. Fernyhough, C. (2008). Getting Vygotskian about Teory of Mind: Mediation, Dialogue, and Development of Social understanding. [Versi Elektronik]. Science Direct Development Review. 28, 225-262.

Flower, L. & Hayes, J.R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication. 3, 365-387.

Foster, P. & Ohta, A.S. (2005). Negotiation of Meaning and Peer Assistance in Second Language Classroom. [Versi Elektronik]. Applied Linguistics. 26(3), 402-430.

Frawley, W. & Lantolf, J. P. (1985) Second Language Discourse: A Vygotskyan Perspective. Applied Linguistics. 6, 19- 44.

Gardner, J. (2006). Assessment and Learning. California, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Gass, S. M. & Sellinker, L. (2008). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. (3rd Ed). New York: Routledge

Huges, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. (2nd Ed). UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jamali, F. & Gheisari, N. (2014) Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Acquisition: Tenets and Pedagogical Implications in An EFL Setting. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 4(2), 72-80.

Khatib, M. (2011) Contributions of Vygotsky’s Theory to Second Language Acquisition. [Versi Elektronik]. European Journal of Scientific Research. 58(1), 44-55.

Kim, Y. & Yoon, H. (2014). The Use of L1 as a Writing Strategy in L2 Writing Tasks. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 14(3), 33-50

Luria, A. & Yudovich, F. (1972). Speech and The Development of Mental Processes in The Child. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

Lantolf, J. P. & Pehner, M.E. (2008) Sociocultural Theory and The Teaching of Second Language. (Eds). London: Equinox.

Lantolf, J. P. & Thone, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. [Versi Elektronik]. Van Pattern, 197-221.

Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (2000) A Vygotskian Perspective on Corrective Feedback in L2: The Effect of Random Versus Negotiated Help on The Learning of English Articles. Language Awareness 1, 34-52.

Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second Language Acquisition in the Classroom Setting: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. Berlin: Springer.

Siti Hamin Stapa & Abdul Hameed Abdul Majid. (2006) The Use Of First Language In Limited English Proficiency Classes:Good, Bad Or Ugly?. Jurnal e-Bangi. 2, Januari-Disember, 2006.

Siti Hamin Stapa & Mohd Mustafa Izahar. (2010). Analysis of Errors in Subject-Verb Agreement Among Malaysian ESL Learners. 3L: Language Linguistics Literature®, Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 16(1), 56-73.

Storch, N. & Aldosari, A. (2010) Learners' Use of First Language (Arabic) in Pair Work in An EFL Class. Language Teaching Research. 14(4), 355 - 375.

Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, J. (2003) Is There a Role for The Use of The L1 in an L2 Setting? TESOL Quarterly. 4, 760-770.

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2011) Language as Agent and Constituent of Cognitive Change in an Older Adult: An Example. [Versi Elektronik]. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 14(1), 104-117.

Tam, S. S. (2009). Negotiation of Meaning in Face-to- face and Synchronous Computer-assisted Interactions Among ESL Undergraduates. Tesis Kedoktoran, Fakulti Bahasa dan Linguistik. Universiti Malaya.

Tavakoli, M., Ghadiri, M. & Zabihi, R. (2014). Direct versus Translated Writing: The Effect of Translation on Learners’ Second Language Writing Ability. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 14(2), 61-74.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2131

ISSN : 1675-8021