A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ ONLINE ENGAGEMENT TOWARDS MATHEMATICS
Abstract
Online learning has become increasingly popular due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Learners are expected to learn remotely from home due to the imposed movement control order. However, a major concern pertaining to students' engagement in mathematics, a subject which is considered difficult and challenging, could be undermined by the adoption of this remote learning method. Such perception could make engagement in an online environment, an environment whereby the teacher may not be able to control students directly, difficult. Therefore, it is important to review the article related to find major findings on factors affecting the students' online engagement in mathematics for helping students and teachers adapt to the online learning environment. This study aimed to perform a systematic literature review on the factors affecting students' online engagement in mathematics and the commonly used method in studying the factors. As a result, 20 credible articles from SCOPUS, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were retrieved using predefined eligibility criteria. The results showed that technology/platform/online teaching strategies and traits were the most important factors that affect students’ online engagement in mathematics and case study was the most common method used in studying students’ online engagement towards mathematics. Educators and other interested stakeholders should consider and incorporate these factors mentioned in this research to promote engagement in Mathematics subject. Moreover, researchers can easily identify the most effective method based on this research for future research.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baker, C. K., & Hjalmarson, M. (2019). Designing purposeful student interactions to advance synchronous learning experiences. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 14(1), 1-16.
Barrington, F. (2011). Australian mathematical sciences institute interim update on year 12 mathematics student numbers. Melbourne: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute.
Capone, R., & Lepore, M. (2021). From distance learning to integrated digital learning: A Fuzzy cognitive analysis focused on engagement, motivation, and participation during COVID-19 Pandemic. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-31.
Choi, G. Y. (2018). Learning through digital storytelling: exploring entertainment techniques in lecture video. Educational Media International, 55(1), 49-63.
Cooper, K. S. (2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 363-402.
Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S. & Borba, M.C. (2020). Tawfik, G. M., Dila, K. A. S., Mohamed, M. Y. F., Tam, D. N. H., Kien, N. D., Ahmed, A. M., & Huy, N. T. (2019). A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical medicine and health, 47(1), 1-9. Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM Mathematics Education 52, 825–841 (2020).
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children's competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental psychology, 38(4), 519.
Fung, F., Tan, C. Y., & Chen, G. (2018). Student engagement and mathematics achievement: Unraveling main and interactive effects. Psychology in the Schools, 55(7), 815-831.
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2021). Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(2), 181-196.
Jeong, J. S., & González-Gómez, D. (2021). A STEM course analysis during COVID-19: A Comparison study in performance and affective domain of PSTs between F2F and F2S flipped classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 3352.
Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9-22.
Koss, L. (2021). Crowdsourcing solutions in the online mathematics classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-7.
Lambert, R., & Schuck, R. (2021). “The wall now between us”: Teaching math to students with disabilities during the COVID Spring of 2020. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 289-298.
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432-479.
Lewis, G. (2013). A portrait of disaffection with school mathematics: The case of Anna. Journal of Motivation, Emotion, and Personality, 1(1), 36-43.
Lim, W., Son, J. W., Gregson, S., & Kim, J. (2018). An examination of high school students' online engagement in mathematics problems. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 13(2), 1-15.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: the effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464-481.
Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., Ginns, P., Malmberg, L. E., Collie, R. J., & Calvo, R. A. (2015). Real-time motivation and engagement during a month at school: Every moment of every day for every student matters. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 26-35.
Morante, A., Djenidi, V., Clark, H., & West, S. (2017). Gender differences in online participation: Examining a history and a mathematics open foundation online course. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 57(2), 266-293.
Muir, T., Douglas, T., & Trimble, A. (2020). Facilitation strategies for enhancing the learning and engagement of online students. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(3), 8.
Raza, S. H., & Reddy, E. (2021). Intentionality and players of effective online courses in mathematics. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 7, 2.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and emotion, 28(2), 147-169.
Rizzo, O. G. (2021). Making good of a pandemic: A Long-distance remedial summer course in calculus. Education Sciences, 11(7), 327.
Roman, T. A., Brantley-Dias, L., Dias, M., & Edwards, B. (2021). Addressing student engagement during COVID-19: Secondary STEM teachers attend to the affective dimension of learner needs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-29.
Scells, H., & Zuccon, G. (2018, June). Generating better queries for systematic reviews. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 475-484).
Schuetz, R. L., Biancarosa, G., & Goode, J. (2018). Is technology the answer? Investigating students’ engagement in math. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4), 318-332.
Skilling, K., Bobis, J., & Martin, A. J. (2021). The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: shifts in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 469-493.
Spitzer, M. W. H., Gutsfeld, R., Wirzberger, M., & Moeller, K. (2021). Evaluating students’ engagement with an online learning environment during and after COVID-19 related school closures: A survival analysis approach. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 25, 100168.
Tawfik, G. M., Dila, K. A. S., Mohamed, M. Y. F., Tam, D. N. H., Kien, N. D., Ahmed, A. M., & Huy, N. T. (2019). A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical medicine and health, 47(1), 1-9.
Thompson, V. L. & McDowell, Y. L. (2019). A case study comparing student experiences and success in an undergraduate course offered through online, blended, and face-to-face instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 7(2), 116-136.
Trenholm, S., Hajek, B., Robinson, C. L., Chinnappan, M., Albrecht, A., & Ashman, H. (2019). Investigating undergraduate mathematics learners’ cognitive engagement with recorded lecture videos. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(1), 3-24.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Index