The Effects of Orthographies, Stress and Consonantal Manners on Syllabification and Acoustic Durations of Intervocalic Consonants with Singleton and Geminate Graphemes by Thai L2 Speakers of English

Anusorn Saechan, Sugunya Ruangjaroon

Abstract


This research investigates how orthographies, stress, and consonantal manners influence syllabification and acoustic durations of intervocalic consonants by Thai L2 English speakers, who were classified into three CEFR English proficiency levels: A1, A2 and B1 and participated in two tasks. The first task aims to examine syllabification, known as a word-part identification task, wherein the participants were instructed to identify the first part of a word in one question item and the second part of the same word in another. The findings reveal dynamic changes in syllabification preferences as L2 proficiency increases. The initial stages of acquisition display a strong reliance on orthographic forms for syllabification. An increase in proficiency is associated with a growing awareness of the interaction of stress with syllabification but a declining reliance on orthography. The second task aims to investigate the production, referred to as a read-aloud task where the participants were asked to read aloud target words in carrier sentences. The durations of intervocalic consonants were analyzed using Praat software (Boersma & Weenink, 2021) based on waveforms and spectrograms. The results indicate that participants at all levels produced intervocalic consonants orthographically represented as geminates significantly longer in duration than those represented as singletons. The durational ratio of orthographic singletons to geminates is overall greater for intervocalic consonants in pre-stress positions than for those in post-stress positions. This ratio steadily decreases from A1 to native English speakers. The findings from both tasks consistently show that higher English proficiency correlates with native-like syllabification and acoustic duration.

 

Keywords: orthographies; stress; consonantal manners; syllabification; durational ratio


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulrazzaq, A. H., & Al-Ubaidy, S. M. A. (2023). Patterns of Diphthong Adaptation within English Loanwords in Iraqi Arabic. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 29, 199-215.

Bada, E. (2001). Native Language Influence on the Production of English Sounds by Japanese Learners. The Reading Matrix, 1(2).

Bassetti, B. (2008). Orthographic input and second language phonology. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 191–206). Multilingual Matters.

Bennett, J. F. (1995). Metrical Foot Structure in Thai and Kayah Li: Optimality-Theoretic Studies in the Prosody of Two Southeast Asian Languages [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois.

Bird, S. F. (2002). The Phonetics and Phonology of Lheidli Intervocalic Consonants [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Arizona.

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2021, July 22). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/

Borowsky, T. (1986). Topics in the lexical phonology of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Borowsky, T., Ito, J., & Mester, R. A. (1984). The formal representation of ambisyllabicity: evidence from Danish. North East Linguistic Society,

Clements, G. N., & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. MIT Press.

Delattre, P. (1971). Pharyngeal features in consonants of Arabic, German, Spanish, French, and American English. Phonetica, 23, 129-155.

Derwing, B. L. (1992). A ‘pause-break’ task for eliciting syllable boundary judgments from literate and illiterate speakers: Preliminary results for five diverse languages. Language and Speech, 35, 219-235.

Derwing, B. L., & Neary, T. M. (1991). The ‘vowel-stickiness’ phenomenon: Three experimental sources of evidence. The 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences,

Di Benedetto, M.-G., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., De Nardis, L., Budoni, S., Arango, J., Chan, I., & DeCaprio, A. (2021). Lexical and syntactic gemination in Italian consonants—Does a geminate Italian consonant consist of a repeated or a strengthened consonant? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149(5), 3375-3386.

Dmitrieva, O. (2012). Geminate Typology and the Perception of Consonant Duration [Doctoral Dissertation, Standford University].

Dmitrieva, O. (2017). Production of Geminate Consonants in Russian. In H. Kubozono (Ed.), The Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants (pp. 34-65). Oxford University Press.

Duanmu, S. (2000). The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford University Press.

Duanmu, S. (2008). Syllable Structure: the Limits of Variation. Oxford University Press.

Durvasula, K., & Huang, H.-H. (2017). Word-internal “ambisyllabic” consonants are not multiply-linked in American English. Language Sciences, 62, 17-36.

Eddington, D., & Elzinga, D. (2008). The phonetic context of flapping in American English: quantitative evidence. Language and Speech, 51, 245-266.

Eddington, D., Treiman, R., & Elzinga, D. (2013). Syllabification of American English: Evidence from a Large-scale Experiment: Part I. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(1), 45-67.

Elzinga, D., & Eddington, D. (2014). An Experiment Approach to Ambisyllabicity in English. Topic in Linguistics(14).

Europe, C. o. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989

Fallow, D. H. (1981). Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure. Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 309-317.

Gordon, M. K. (2006). Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, Typology. Routledge.

Gussenhoven, C. (1986). English plosive allophones and ambisyllabicity. Gramma, 10, 119-141.

Gussenhoven, C., & Jacobs, H. (2017). Understanding Phonology (4th ed.). Routledge.

Gut, U. (2009). Introduction to English Phonetics and Phonology. Perter Lang.

Ham, W. H. (2001). Phonetic and Phonological Aspects of Geminate Timing. Routledge.

Hammond, M. (1999). The Phonology of English: A Prosodic Optimality Theoretic Approach. Oxford University Press.

Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253-306.

Hayes, B. (2009). Introductory Phonology. Wiley Blackwell.

Hyman, L. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Foris.

Ishikawa, K. (2002). Syllabification of Intervocalic consonants by English and Japanese Speakers. Language and Speech, 45, 355-385.

Jensen, J. (2000). Against ambisyllabicity. Phonology, 17, 187-235.

Kager, R. (1989). A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch. Foris.

Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology Massachusetts Institute of Technology].

Kenstowicz, M., & Suchato, A. (2006). Issues in loanword adaptation: a case study from Thai. Lingua, 116, 921-949.

Kotzor, S., Wetterlin, A., & Lahiri, A. (2017). Bengali Geminates: Processing and Representation. In H. Kubozono (Ed.), The Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants (pp. 187-203). Oxford University Press.

Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages. Blackwell Publisher.

Lahiri, A., & Hankamer, J. (1988). The Timing of Geminate Consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 16, 38-327.

Lee, J. K., & Seo, Y. (2019). A Phonetic Examination of Phonological Ambisyllabicity: Focusing on Temporal and Spectral Characteristics. Linguistic Research, 36(1), 91-110.

Levin, J. (1985). A Metrical Theory of Syllabicity MIT].

Li, F. (2016). Contrastive study between pronunciation Chinese L1 and English L2 from the perspective of interference based on observations in genuine teaching contexts. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 90-100.

Lin, L.-c. (2011). Fundamental Generalizations of English Syllabification. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 37(2), 179-208.

Major, R. C. (2008). Transfer in second language phonology: A review. In J. G. H. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. John Benjamins Publishing.

Marchand, Y., Adsett, C. R., & Damper, R. I. (2009). Automatic syllabification in English: A comparison of different algorithms. Language and Speech, 52, 1-27.

McCarthy, J. (1986). OCP effects: Gemination and Antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 207-263.

McCully, C. (2009). The Sound Structure of English. Cambridge University Press.

Murray, R., & Vennemann, T. (1983). Sound change and syllable structure in Germanic Phonology. Language, 59, 514–528.

Oh, E. (2017). Durational aspects of Korean nasal geminates. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 9(4), 19-25.

Oh, G. E., & Redford, M. A. (2012). The Production and Phonetic Representation of Fake Geminates in English. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 82-91.

Oh, K. Y. (2020). Complex Analysis and Proposal for Verifying Realization Direction of Geminates. The Journal of Studies in Language, 36(3), 373-395.

Petkla, C. (2020). Vowel Adaptation in English Loanwords in Thai Newcastle University]. Newcastle.

Prince, A. (1990). Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. In M. Ziolkowski, M. Noske, & K. Deaton (Eds.), Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology (pp. 355–398). Chicago Linguistic Society.

Pulgram, E. (1970). Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus. Mouton.

Ruangjaroon, S. (2020). Variation of Oral and Nasal Stops by English and Japanese Learners of Thai. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 13(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/10524/52463

Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The Syllable. In H. Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations (pp. 83-337). Foris.

Suh, Y. (2001). A Study of Syllabification and Allophonic Alternations in English Sogang University]. Seoul.

Thirakunkovit, S. (2019). Production of English Geminate Consonants by Thai Learners. Journal of Language and Culture, 39(1), 19-36.

Thirakunkovit, S. (2021). Production and Perception of Geminate Consonants in English Words by Thai Learners of English: Implications for English Teaching and Learning. English as a Foreign Language International Journal: EFLIJ, 25(4), 55-83.

Treiman, R., Bowey, J. A., & Bourassa, D. (2002). Segmentation of spoken words into syllables by English-speaking children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 213-238.

Treiman, R., & Danis, C. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 87-104.

Treiman, R., Gross, J., & Cwikiel-Glavin, A. (1992). The syllabification of /s/ clusters in English. Phonetics, 20, 383-402.

Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification. Memory and Language, 29, 66-85.

Vennemann, T. (1972). On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguistische, 18, 1-18.

Yavas, M. (2011). Applied English Phonology (2nd ed. ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Zec, D. (2007). The Syllable. In P. De Lacy (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology (pp. 161-194). Cambridge University Press.

Zirak, M., & Skaer, P. M. (2013). Evidence of Gemination in Persian : Phonetic and phonological study of lexical and post-lexical geminates. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University. I, Studies in human sciences, 8, 17-41.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3002-11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157