Leveraging L1 Folklore: Enhancing Fictional Narrative Writing with Metacognitive Strategies in Blended Learning Environments
Abstract
This study investigates the efficacy of integrating metacognitive strategies and L1 folklore in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) fictional narrative writing within a blended learning framework. Conducted across 40 Indonesian university students, the quasi-experimental design employed pre and post-tests to measure improvements. Metacognitive techniques (planning, drafting, peer review, self-reflection, and revising) and narrative dimension assessments (voice, characterisation, mood, language, dialogue, story, setting, image, and plot) were applied. A significantly higher rate of EFL narrative writing skill development was observed following the intervention, with 55% of students reaching a very good level and 42.5% getting an excellent level. This highlights the effectiveness of metacognitive strategies in managing time constraints and leveraging L1 folklore to enrich narrative writing. The findings suggest potential long-term benefits and emphasise the need for tailored strategies consistent with cultural contexts. Recommendations include targeted exercises, personalised approaches, peer collaboration, and sustained exposure to L1 folklore to optimise EFL narrative skills. In conclusion, integrating metacognitive strategies and cultural elements enhances EFL education, offering a tailored approach to narrative writing for academic success, particularly considering the needs of Indonesian students in blended learning environments.
Keywords: asynchronous platform; creative writing; fictional narrative genre; local folklore; narrative heritage
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anthonysamy, L. (2021). The use of metacognitive strategies for undisrupted online learning: Preparing university students in the age of pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6881–6899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10518-y
Ataizi, M., & Aksak Kömür, İ. (2021). Teaching writing skills in EFL classes with blending learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(4), 822–834. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.932682
Baharudin, M. D., & Razali, A. B. (2021). A Review of Literature on the Potentials and Problems of Face-to-Face and Online Peer Feedback and the Patterns of Interaction among ESL/EFL Learners in a Peer Feedback Environment. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 27(4), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-
-2704-09
Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w
Bullock, O. M., Shulman, H. C., & Huskey, R. (2021). Narratives are persuasive because they are easier to understand: Examining processing fluency as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Frontiers in Communication, 6(September), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.719615
Carey, M. D., Davidow, S., & Williams, P. (2022). Re-imagining narrative writing and assessment: a post-NAPLAN craft-based rubric for creative writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00004-4
Ceylan, V. K., & Elitok Kesici, A. (2017). Effect of blended learning to academic achievement. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 308. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i1.4141
Chong, S. W. (2021). Improving peer-review by developing reviewers’ feedback literacy. Learned Publishing, 34(3), 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1378
Fterniati, A. (2016). Literacies. January 2012.
Ganapathy, M., Ai Lin Tan, D., & Phan, J. (2020). Impact of written corrective feedback on malaysian ESL secondary students’ writing performance. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 26(3), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2603-11
Glăveanu, V. P., Ness, I. J., Wasson, B., & Lubart, T. (2019). Sociocultural Perspectives on Creativity, Learning, and Technology. 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_4
Guo, W., Bai, B., & Song, H. (2021). Influences of process-based instruction on students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies in EFL writing. System, 101(December 2020), 102578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102578
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40(November 2017), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001
Ida Bagus Kade Gunayasa, I Ketut Widiada, Moh. Irawan Zain, Muhammad Tahir, & Amrullah, L. W. Z. (2023). Development of the Digital Story Book ’Lalu Dia Lala Jinis’ As a Learning Media for 5Th Grade Elementary School Students. Progres Pendidikan, 4(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v4i1.324
Johnson, C. C., Walton, J. B., Strickler, L., & Elliott, J. B. (2023). Online Teaching in K-12 Education in the United States: A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 93(3), 353–411. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221105550
Kadmiry, M. (2021). The Comparison between the Process-oriented Approach and the Product-oriented Approach in Teaching Writing. 12(March), 198–214.
Kim, T., & Kim, Y. (2016). The Journal of Asia TEFL. 13(2), 138–155.
Kirby, M. S., Spencer, T. D., & Chen, Y. J. I. (2021). Oral Narrative Instruction Improves Kindergarten Writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 37(6), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1879696
Litterio, L. M. (2018). Contract grading in the technical writing classroom: Blending community-based assessment and self-assessment. Assessing Writing, 38(August 2017), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.002
Liveley, G., Slocombe, W., & Spiers, E. (2021). Futures literacy through narrative. Futures, 125(December 2020), 102663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102663
Majid, A. H. A., & Stapa, S. H. (2017). The use of scaffolding technique via Facebook in improving descriptive writing among ESL Learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(4), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-07
Margarida Veiga-Simão, A., Oliveira, S., Silva-Moreira, J., & Itália Temudo, M. (2022). Assessing the Efficacy and Social Validity of CriaTivo, a Curriculum-Based Intervention to Promote Self-Regulation of Writing in Portuguese Elementary Education. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221117133
Moreno-Cely, A., Cuajera-Nahui, D., Escobar-Vasquez, C. G., Vanwing, T., & Tapia-Ponce, N. (2021). Breaking monologues in collaborative research: bridging knowledge systems through a listening-based dialogue of wisdom approach. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00937-8
Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002
Nilforoushan, S., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, G. R. (2023). Exploring the Perceived and Real Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Iranian EFL Learners: Different Text Types in Focus. SAGE Open, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231164567
Nourazar, S., Kakvand, R., & Aliasin, S. H. (2022). The Impact of Scaffolded Metacognitive Writing Strategy Instruction on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ IELTS Writing Task 2. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6297895
Phaiboonnugulkij, M. (2023). Language Learning Strategies Instruction via English for Community-based Tourism Blended Lessons to Enhance Speaking Ability of Thai EFL Youth Guides. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 29(4), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2904-12
Quinlan, J. A., Padgett, J. K., Khajehnassiri, A., & Mar, R. A. (2022). Does a Brief Exposure to Literary Fiction Improve Social Ability? Assessing the Evidential Value of Published Studies With a p-Curve. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(3), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001302
Rahman, A. M. A., Azmi, M. N. L., & Hassan, I. (2020). Improvement of English Writing Skills through Blended Learning among University Students in Malaysia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7694–7701. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082556
Ruslan, T. S., Hidayat, E. W., Muzdalipah, I., & Ginanjar, A. A. (2022). Transformation of Folklore Texts into Interactive Multimedia Digital Forms as Blended Learning Teaching Material. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2022), 575–580.
https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-91-6_89
Sinamo, F. L., Lubis, B. N. A., Barus, T. A. E., & Sembiring, S. J. (2021). The Revitalization of Batu Parsidangan Batak Toba Folklore Into Teaching Materials in English Subject for Junior High School. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 4(2), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i2.1824
Tengku Mahadi, T. S., Md Husain, F., Jaganathan, P., Hassan, A., Syed Fesal, S. N. H., & Mohamad, A. (2018). Developing narrative writing skills via a reading programme for low english language proficiency undergraduates. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 18(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1802-01
Toba, R., Noor, W. N., & Sanu, L. O. (2019). The Current Issues of Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Skills: Ability, Problem, and Reason in Writing Comparison and Contrast Essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506
Tsai, C. W., Lee, L. Y., Cheng, Y. P., Lin, C. H., Hung, M. L., & Lin, J. W. (2022). Integrating online meta-cognitive learning strategy and team regulation to develop students’ programming skills, academic motivation, and refusal self-efficacy of Internet use in a cloud classroom. Universal Access in the Information Society, 0123456789.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00958-9
Vaezi, M., & Rezaei, S. (2019). Development of a rubric for evaluating creative writing: a multi-phase research. New Writing, 16(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2018.1520894
van Hoorn, J., de Water, E., Dekkers, T. J., Pollak, Y., Popma, A., Jansen, B. R. J., Huizenga, H. M., & van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K. (2022). Peer feedback decreases impulsive choice in adolescents with and without attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder. JCPP Advances, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12065
Vuogan, A., & Li, S. (2023). Examining the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing: A Meta-Analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1115–1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3178
Werdistira, I. W. A., & Purnama, I. G. A. V. (2020). Local wisdom based Balinese digital storytelling through blended learning method. Linguistics and Culture Review, 4(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v4n1.26
Wijaya, K. F. (2022). Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on Formative Assessment in Writing. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3359
Wu, Z. (2020). Tracing EFL writers’ digital literacy practices in asynchronous communication: A multiple-case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50(September 2019), 100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100754
Yang, X. (2022). Research on Digital Teaching of Creative Writing in the Context of Computer Big Data. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2699833
Yeh, H. C. (2015). Facilitating metacognitive processes of academic genre-based writing using an online writing system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881384
Zamri, Z. M., & Narasuman, S. (2023). The effect of blended learning models on ESL students' self-efficacy and proficiency. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 29(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2901-10
Zhang, X. (2021). Democratising the Online Materials-Based Classroom : What Can Student Writers ' Voices Offer ? https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211032410
Zhang, Y. (2022). Incorporating Peer Response with Teacher Feedback in Teaching Writing to EFL Learners: A Literature Review. English Language Teaching, 15(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n3p48
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3002-16
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157