Sound Symbolism in the Proto-Turkic Language

Bolat Khassenov

Abstract


Studies on the Turkic languages have shown that the difference between related terms concerning male and female, including back and front vowels, is a “separate case” (a special case). In this article, such a phenomenon was studied in more depth and detail, and for the first time, it was associated with sound symbolism. This work aims to show the role of sound symbolism in the classification of kinship terms related to man and woman in the Proto-Turkic language. To achieve this goal, we conducted experimental work with four babies. Our experiment was based on the bouba/kiki effect, which is used in modern linguistics. Besides, in the research work, an associative experiment was conducted with students studying at Karaganda University. Thirty-five students took part in the experiment. The study results showed that infants associated the image of a man, large objects with back vowels, and the image of a woman, small objects with front vowels. According to the results obtained using the associative method, the participants associated the front vowels with the stimulus “female”, and the back vowels were not associated with “male”. However, the participants showed an advantage in associating men with the uvular consonant [q], which is only combined with back vowels. In the Turkic languages, we also found that terms associated with back (thick) vowels have meanings associated with males, and terms associated with front (thin) vowels have meanings associated with females.

 

Keywords: sound symbolism; Proto-Turkic language; Turkic languages; Proto-language; male and female categories; vowels


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alpher, B. (1994). Yir-Yoront ideophones. Sound symbolism (eds., Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J.J.), 161–177. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Auracher, J. (2017). Sound iconicity of abstract concepts: Place of articulation is implicitly associated with abstract concepts of size and social dominance. PloS One, 12(11).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187196

Beltyukov, V.I. (1964). Ob usvoenii det'mi zvukov rechi [About the assimilation of speech sounds by children]. Prosveschenie.

Blasi, D.E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P.F., & Christiansen, M.H. (2016). Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences, 113, 10818–10823. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605782113

Childs, G.T. (1994). African ideophones. Sound symbolism (eds., Hinton, L., Nichols, J.&Ohala, J.J.), 178–206. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cutler, A., McQueen, J., Robinson, K. (1990). Elizabeth and John: Sound patterns of men’s and women’s names. Journal of Linguistics, 26(2), 471–482. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4176070

D’Onofrio, A. (2013). Phonetic detail and dimensionality in sound-shape correspondences: Refining the bouba-kiki paradigm. Language and Speech, 57, 367–393.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913507694

De Boysson-Bardies, B., Halle, P., Sagart, L., Durand, C. (1989). A crosslinguistic investigation of vowel formants in babbling. Journal of Child Language, 16(1), 1-17.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900013404

de Saussure, F. (1999). Course in general linguistics [Transl. Bespalov, V. E., Rut, M.E.]. Izd.Uralskogo Universiteta

Eskeeva, M. (2003). Tarıhıy dıbıs özgeristeri [Historical sound changes]. Astana: Eurasian National University.

Fort, M., Martin, A., & Peperkamp, S. (2015). Consonants are more important than vowels in the bouba-kiki effect. Language and speech, 58, 247–266

https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830914534951

Fort, M., Lammertink, I., Peperkamp, S., Guevara-Rukoz, A., Fikkert, P., Tsuji, S. (2018). Symbouki: a meta-analysis on the emergence of sound symbolism in early language acquisition.

Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12659

Gabysheva, L. L. (1994). Prostranstvenno-vremennaya leksika i tsvetovaya metafora v tekstah olonho. [Spatio-temporal vocabulary and color metaphor in olonkho texts]. Yazyik – mif –

kul'tura narodov Sibiri. [Language - myth - culture of the peoples of Siberia], 3, 3-16.

Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203(3), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88

Hoshi, H., Kwon, N., Akita, K., & Auracher, J. (2019). Semantic Associations Dominate Over Perceptual Associations in Vowel-Size Iconicity. i-Perception, 10(4),

https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519861981

Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series

B, Biological Sciences, 369. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298

Ivanov, V.V. (2009). Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kultury. T. 5. Mifologya i fol'klor [Selected works on semiotics and history of culture. Vol.5. Mythology and Folklore]. Moscow: Znak.

Ivanov, V.V. (1978). Chet i nechet: Asimmetrya mozga i znakovyh system [Outside and out: Asymmetry of the brain and signaling systems]. Moscow: Sovetskoe Radio.

Ivanov, V. V. (1990). Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya.

Johansson, N., Anikin, A., Aseyev, N. (2019). Color sound symbolism in natural languages. Language and Cognition, 12(1), 56-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.35

Kaidar, A. T. (2005). Struktura odnoslozhnyh kornej i osnov v kazahskom yazyke [The structure of monosyllabic roots and stems in the Kazakh language]. Almaty: Nauka.

Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., Evans, D., Kita, S. (2019). Sound symbolism facilitates long-term retention of the semantic representation of novel verbs in three-year-olds. Languages, 4(2), 21.

https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4020021

Kashgari, М. (1998). Divani lugat-it-Turk. Vol. 1. Almaty: Khant.

Kawahara, S., Noto, A., & Kumagai, G. (2018). Sound symbolic patterns in Pokémon names. Phonetica, 75(3), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1159/000484938

Kellogg, R. (1969). Analysing Childrens Art. СА: Mountain View.

Khassenov, B., Nefedova, L., Adilova, A. (2020). Implementation of sound opposition in children’s speech. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences, WUT, 86, 16-24.

15405/epsbs.2020.08.3

Khassenov, B., Adilova, A., Takirov S., Kaukerbekova, B.. (2021). A new vision of numerical symbolism in calendar and life cycles. European Journal of Science and Theology, 17(1), 93-102.

Khusainov, K. Sh. (1988). Zvukoizobrazitel'nost na kazahskom yazyike [Sound visualisation in the Kazakh language]. Almaty: Nauka.

Kita, S. (1997). Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics, 35, 379–415. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379

Kornilov, G.E. (1978). K teorii imitativov i dannye chuvashskih dialektov [To the theory of imitative and the data of the Chuvash dialects]. Dialektyi i toponimiya Povoljya. [Dialects and place

names of the Volga region], 98-152.

Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.

Leroi-Gourhan, А. (1993). Gesture and Speech. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: MIT Press.

Lockwood, G., & Dingemanse, M. (2015). Iconicity in the lab: A review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01246

Miron, M.S. (1961). A crosslinguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045212

Morgan, L., & Wren, Y. E. (2018). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Early Vocalisations and Babbling Patterns in Young Children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 40(1), 3-14.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740118760215

Motamedi, Y., Little, H., Nielsen, A., Sulik, J. (2019). The iconicity toolbox: empirical approaches to measuring iconicity. Language and Cognition, 1–20.

https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.14

Nielsen, A. K. S., & Dingemanse, M. (2020). Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920914339

Nielsen, A.K. S., & Rendall, D. (2011). The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic takete-maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental

Psychology, 65, 115–124.10.1037 / a0022268

Oller, D.K., & Eilers, R.E. (1982). Similarity of babbling in Spanish-and English-learning babies. Journal of Child Language, 9(3), 565-577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004918

Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound – shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child

Psychology, 114, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.004

Pagel, M., Atkinson, Q.D., Calude, A.S. & Meade, A. (2013). Ultraconserved words point to deep language ancestry across Eurasia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(21),

−8476. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218726110

Pejovic, J., & Molnar, M. (2017).The development of spontaneous sound-shape matching in monolingual and bilingual infants during the first year. Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 581–

https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000237

Perniss, P., Thompson, R.L., Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Front Psychol., 1.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227

Pinker, S. (2003). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. Penguin UK.

Pitcher, B.J., Mesoudi, A., McElligott, A.G. (2013). Sex-biased sound symbolism in English-language first names. PloS One, 8(6) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064825

Podosinov, A.V. (1999). Ex oriente lux! Orientation by countries of the world in archaic cultures of Eurasia. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture.

Ramachandran, V.S. & Hubbard, E.M. (2001). Synaesthesia – a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3−34.

http://chip.ucsd.edu/pdf/Synaesthesia%20-%20JCS.pdf

Räsänen, М. (1955). Materyaly po istoricheskoy fonetike tyurkskih yazykov [Materials on the historical phonetics of the Turkic languages]. Inostrannoy literaturyі.

Robb, M., & Bleile, K. (1994). Consonant inventories of young children from 8 to 25 months. Clinical Linguist Phonetics, 8, 295–320. 10.3109 / 02699209408985314

Sagyndykuly, B. (2009). Fonologicheskie zakonomernos'ti razvitiya leksiki tyurkskih yazykov [Phonological regularities of vocabulary development of Turkic languages]. Almaty: Arys.

Samarin, W.J. (1971). Survey of Bantu ideophones. African Language Studies, 7, 130–168. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/67168

Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070931

Sartkojauly, K. (2007). Bayyrgy turkі jazuynyng genezisі [Genesis of ancient Turkic writing]. Astana: Arys.

Sartkojauly, K. (2012). Orhon muralary [Orkhon heritage]. Astana: Abzal-Ai.

Sevortyan, E.V. (1974). Etimologichesκiy slovar' tyurκsκih yazyκov. Obschetyurκsκie i mejtyurκsκie osnovyy na na glasnye [Etymological Dictionary of Turkic languages. Common Turkic and

inter-Turkic stems on vowels]. Moscow: Nauκa.

Sidhu, D.M., & Pexman, P.M. (2015). What’s in a name? Sound symbolism and gender in first names. PloS One, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126809

Sidhu, D.M., & Pexman, P.M. (2018). Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1619–1643. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1361-1

Sidhu, D.M., Pexman, P.M. (2019). The Sound Symbolism of Names. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 398-402. 10.1177/0963721419850134

Slater, A.S., Feinman, S. (1985). Gender and the phonology of North American first names. Sex Roles,13, 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287953

Starostin, S. (1998-2005). The Tower of Babel. An Etymological Database Project. https://starling.rinet.ru/main.html

Styles, S. J., Gawne, L. (2017). When does maluma/takete fail? Two key failures and a meta-analysis suggest that phonology and phonotactics matter. I-Perception, 8(4).

https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517724807

Vladimirtsov, B.Ya. (1989). Sravnitel'naya grammatika mongolskogo pismennogo yazyka i halhasskogo narechya [Comparative grammar of the Mongolian written language and the Khalkha

dialect]. Moscow: Nauka.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2701-08

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

 

 

eISSN : 2550-2247

ISSN : 0128-5157