Critical Agency and Glocal Subjectivity in ELT Material Development: An Analysis of English Language Textbook of Bangladesh
Abstract
This paper explores ‘glocal subjectivity’ in an English language textbook produced by National Curriculum and Textbook Board of Bangladesh for Grades XI-XII. In the era of globalization (Mukherjee & Krieckhaus 2011), glocal subjectivity, i.e. creation of self that appreciates the ingredients of both global and local spaces (Gutierrez 2013) is relevant for material development in ELT, as it carries implications for critical agency (Richmond 2011). In post-colonial countries, critical agency allows non-native textbook writers to exercise freedom in selecting themes and designing language learning activities which may be used in the classrooms to develop critical minds (Pineda-Báez 2004). Through qualitative content analysis (Julien 2008), this research examines how the non-native material writers in Bangladesh exerted critical agency to construct glocal subjectivity in the English textbook. Findings reveal that textbook writers constructed glocal subjectivity by selecting appropriate topics. Nevertheless, the textbook contains the following limitations: pedagogically unsound language learning activities, low aesthetic quality, misrepresentation of Bangladesh, and post-colonial ambivalence. Based on the findings, this paper suggests that textbook writers in the post-colonial countries need to be aware of the issue of representation and make use of the wisdom of Applied Linguistics to produce politically correct and pedagogically effective English language textbook.
Keywords: critical agency; glocal subjectivity; material development; resistance; post-colonial
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abbasian, R. & Biria, R. (2017). English language textbooks in EFL education: Do they improve students’ national, international and target culture familiarity? Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 20(2), 49-65. doi: 10.5782/2223-2621.2017.20.2.49
Arthur, B. (1968). Reading literature and learning a second language. Language Learning. 18(3-4), 199-210.
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. & Tiffin, H. (1998). Key concepts in post-colonial studies. New York: Routledge.
Aziz, S. S. A. & Zillur, K. (2016). Textbook quality and distribution in Bangladesh. Dhaka: BRAC Institute of Governance and Development.
Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education. 39(3), 363-391.
Bao, D. (2016). Improvements in today’s ELT materials development. In M. Azarnoosh, M. Zeraatpishe, A. Faravani, & H. R. Kargozari (Eds.). Issues in material development (pp. 193-205). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Barry, P. (2002). Beginning theory: An introduction to literary and cultural theory (2nd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Pres.
Berger, A. A. (2008). Artifacts. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi: 10.1002/9781405186407.wbieca056
Billah, M. (2016, February 4). The quality of textbooks [Editorial]. The Independent.
Billah, Q. M., Alam, F., Shahidullah, M., Mortuza, S., Haider, Z. & Roy, G. (2015). English for today. Dhaka: National Curriculum & Textbook Board.
Cotthoff, H. & Spencer-Oatey, H. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of intercultural communication. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Davies, B. & Harre, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. 20(1), 43-63.
Dienstag, J. F. (2015). Pessimism. In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. (pp. 1-2). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0762
Dix, S. (2016). Teaching writing: A multilayered participatory scaffolding practice. Literacy. 50(1), 23-31.
Edwards, R. & Usher, R. (2008). Globalization and pedagogy: Space, place and identity (2nd ed.). London:
Routledge.
English curriculum for eleven & twelve. (2012). Dhaka: National Curriculum & Textbook Board.
Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
Falvey, P. & Kennedy, P. (Eds.). (1997). Learning language through literature. Aberdeen: Hong Kong
University Press.
Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(1), 80-92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107
Ghosh, S. T. (2016). Politics of representation. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies (pp. 1-5). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss693
Gutierrez, A. K. (2013). Metamorphosis: The emergence of glocal subjectivities in the blend of global, local, east, and west. In J. Stephens (Ed.), Subjectivity in Asian children’s literature and film: Global theories and implications (pp. 19-42). New York: Routledge.
Habib, M. A. R. (2011). Literary criticism from Plato to the present: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 15(9), 1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
Hunter, J. D. (1997). English language teaching: Linguistic and cultural imperialism? Revista De Eestudos
Da Linguagem. 5(1), 87-102.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, G. M. & Goatly, A. (2000). The treatment of ecological issues in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal. 54(3), 256-264.
Jahan, I. (2005). Cultural incompatibility of ELT materials: Evaluation of Headway. Spectrum. 3, 104-113.
Jahan, M. A. (2012). Residual cultural imperialism in primary textbooks in Bangladesh: A critique of the English for Today Textbooks. East West University Journal of Humanities, 3 79-94.
Julien, H. (2008). Content analysis. In The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Methods. (Vol. 1 & 2, pp. 120-121). London: Sage.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2018). Local context-based English lessons: Forging northern Thai knowledge, fostering English vocabulary. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 24(2), 127-142. doi: 10.17576/3L-2018-2402-10
Keshavarzi, A. (2012). Use of literature in teaching English. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences. 46, 554-559.
Khodadady, E. & Shayesteh, S. (2016). Cultural and linguistic imperialism and the EIL movement: Evidence from a textbook analysis. Issues in Educational Research. 26(4), 604-622.
Kirshner, L. A. (2005). Rethinking desire: The objet petit a in Lacanian theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 53(1), 83-102. doi: 10.1177/00030651050530010901
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kramsch, C. (2006). The multilingual subject. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 16(1), 97-110.
Kramsch, K. (2013). Subjectivity. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. (pp. 1-6). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1122
Lacan, J. (1977). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: W. W.
Norton & Company.
Lee, H. Y. -H. (2019). Rethinking globalization, English and multilingualism in Thailand: A report on a five-year ethnography. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 25(1), 69-84. doi: 10.17576/3L-2019-2501-05
Lekawael, R. F. J., Emzir. & Rafli, Z. (2018). The cultural values in texts of English coursebooks for junior high school in Ambon, Moluccas-Indonesia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 9 (2), 24-30.
Mareck, M. (2014). Global, Local or Glocal? The debate continues. Research World. 45, 26-29. doi: 10.1002/rwm3.20085
McDonough, J., Shaw, C. & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (3rd ed). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Millennium development goals: Bangladesh progress report 2012. (2013). Bangladesh Planning Commission.
Mishan, F. & Timmis, I. (2015). Materials development for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.
Mufwene, S. S. (2015). Colonization, indigenization, and the differential evolution of English: Some ecological perspectives. World Englishes. 34(1), 6-21. doi: 10.1111/weng.12129
Mundale, J. (2004). That way madness lies: At the intersection of philosophy and clinical psychology. Metaphilosophy. 35(5), 661-674.
Mukherjee, N. & Krieckhaus, J. (2011). Globalization and human well-being. International Political Science Review. 33(2), 150-170.
Nambiar, P. M. K., Hashim, R. S. & Yasin, R. M. (2018). Impact of integrating local culture into language materials on communicative ability of Malaysian lower secondary learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 24(4), 13-26. doi: 10.17576/3L-2018-2404-02
Okazaki, T. (2005). Critical consciousness and critical language teaching. Second Language Studies. 23(2), 174-202.
Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London: Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pennycook, A. (2017). The cultural politics of English language. New York: Routledge.
Pennycook, A. (2018). Posthumanist applied linguistics. London: Routledge.
Perks, R. & Thomson, A. (Eds.). (2003). The oral history reader. London: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pineda-Báez, C. (2004). Critical thinking in the EFL classroom: The search for a pedagogical alternative to improve English learning. Íkala, journal of language and culture. 9(15), 45-80.
Pollock, D. (Ed.). (2005). Remembering: Oral history performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rahman, M. A. (2011). Social and environmental thinking of Rabindranath Tagore in the light of post-Tagorean world development. Dhaka: Bangla Academy.
Rampton, M. B. H. (1996). Displacing the native ‘speaker’: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. In T.
Hedge, & N. Whitney (Eds.), Power, pedagogy, and practice (pp. 17-22). New York: Oxford University Press.
Rashidi, N. & Meihami, H. (2016). Hidden curriculum: An analysis of cultural content of the ELT textbooks in inner, outer, and expanding circle countries. Cogent Education. 3, 1-17.
Rebughini, P. (2018). Critical agency and the future of critique. Current Sociology. 66(1), 3-19. doi: 10.1177/0011392117702427
Richards, I. A. (1930). Practical criticism: A study of literary judgment. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & CO. LTD.
Richmond, O. P. (2011). Critical agency, resistance and a post-colonial civil society. Cooperation and Conflict. 46(4), 419-440.
Rodríguez, L. F. G. (2015). The cultural content in EFL textbooks and what teachers need to do about it. Profile. 17(2), 167-187. doi: 10.15446/profile.v17n2.44272
Roy, G. (2004). Resistance management in CPD: A case study from Bangladesh. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Exeter, Exeter.
Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 15(1), 85-109.
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170-183). London: Sage.
Shahidullah, D. M., Islam, J., Majid, I. A. N. & Shams, N. (2001). English for today. Dhaka: National Curriculum & Textbook Board.
Sharifian, F. (Ed.). (2009). English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Shintani, N., Aubrey, S. & Donnellan, M. (2016). The effects of pre-task and post-task metalinguistic explanations on accuracy in second language writing. TESOL Quarterly. 50(4), 945-955.
Shirkhani, S. & Fahim, M. (2011). Enhancing critical thinking in foreign language learners. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences. 29, 111-115.
Simpson, P. (1997). Language through literature: An introduction. London: Routledge.
Stillar, S. (2013). Raising critical consciousness via creative writing in the EFL classroom. TESOL Journal. 4(1), 164-174.
Sung, C. C. M. (2014). Global, local or glocal? Identities of L2 learners in English as a lingua franca communication. Language, Culture and Curriculum. 27(1), 43-57. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.890210
Tagore, R. (1993). He mor chitto, punno tirthe [O my mind, in the sacred land]. In Gitabitan [Garden of songs] (p. 251). Kolkata: Visvabharati Gronthonbibhag. (Original work published in 1931 and 1932)
Timmis, I. (2016). Materials to develop speaking skill. In M. Azarnoosh, M. Zeraatpishe, A. Faravani, & H. R. Kargozari (Eds.). Issues in material development (pp. 83-92). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching. 45(2), 143-179. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000528
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2014). Developing materials for language teaching (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.
Vaish, V. (2010). Globalization of language and culture in Asia: The impact of globalization processes on language. New York: Continuum.
Veselinovska, S. S. & Kirova, S. (2013). Blending the teaching of environmental matters and English as a second or foreign language in Macedonia. Natura Montenegrina. 12(3-4), 1065-1071.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. London, England: Routledge.
Wickman, P.-O. & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science
Education. 86(5), 601-623. doi: 10.1002/sce.10036
Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Xu, Z. (2013). Globalization, culture and ELT materials: A focus on China. Multilingual Education, 3(6), 1-19.
Zarei, G. R. & Khalessi, M. (2011). Cultural load in English language textbooks: An analysis of interchange series. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 15, 294-301.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2502-12
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157