Moderate Moralism: The Aesthetic Virtue and Defect in Bob Dylan’s ‘Masters of War’ and ‘Neighbourhood Bully’
Abstract
No one can argue against the fact that the first thing that will keep the reader wanting to complete reading or to reread a literary text is the aesthetic experience that the work affords. This can be noticed when the perceiver faces any successful work of art. There is a sense of amusement and excitement (an aesthetic experience). This experience is emergent, formed as a result of the artistic value of the work. One of the elements comprising the artistic value is the moral dimension. Poems, and indeed any art work may hold moral value which will affect the experience of receiving them. The concept of moral value and its relation to aesthetic value in some art forms has been discussed by many scholars. This paper discusses the merit of Noel Carrol’s theory, moderate moralism. It then displays the moral virtues and defects of lyrics from two Bob Dylan’s songs, Masters of War and Neighbourhood Bully on the real readers’ aesthetic experience by using insights from moderate moralism, to establish the relationships between moral defects and virtues and their aesthetic value.
Keywords: aesthetics; morality; Dylan; reader response; poetry
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, J. C. & Dean, T. J. (1998) Moderate Autonomism. British Journal of Aesthetics. Vol. 38. 150-166.
Behrooz, N. & Pirnajmuddin, H.(2016) The Ridiculous Sublime in Don DeLillo’s. GEMA Online® of Language Studies. Vol. 16. 183-197.
Carroll, N. (1996). Moderate Moralism. British Journal of Aesthetics. Vol. 36, 223-238.
Carroll, N. (1998). Moderate Moralism versus Moderate Autonomism. British Journal of Aesthetics. Vol. 38, 419-424.
Carroll, N. (2001). Beyond Aesthetics Philosophical Essays. NewYork, Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, N. (2006). Aesthetic Experience: A Question of Content. In Kieran, Mathew (Ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and The Philosophy of Art (pp. 69-97). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Carroll, N. (2013) Rough Heroes: A Response to A.W. Eaton. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 71, 371-376.
Dickie, G. (1964). The Myth of Aesthetic Attitude. American Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 1, 56-65.
Dylan, B. (2016). The Lyrics 1961-2012. Simon & Schuster.
Eagleton, T. (1990) The Ideology of The Aesthetic. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Eaton, A. W. (2012) Robust Immoralism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 70, 281- 292.
Eaton, A. W. (2016) Literature Morality. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of literature. Noel Carroll and Jon Gibson (Ed.) Routledge Publishing.
Gaut, B. (1998). The Ethical Criticism of Art. In J. Levinson (Ed.), Aesthetics and Ethics Essays at the intersection (pp. 182-203). New York, Cambridge university Press.
Gaut, B. (2007). Art, Emotion, and Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Grethlein, J. (2015). Aesthetic Experiences, Ancient and Modern. The New Literary History. Vol. 46, 309-333.
Hume, D. (1757). Of the Standard of Taste. In C. W. Eliott (Ed.), English Essays from Sir Philip Sidney to Macaulay (pp. 215-236).
Iser, W. (1972). The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach. New Literary History. Vol 3, 279-299.
Jacobson, D. (1996) Sir Philip Sidney's Dilemma: On the Ethical Function of Narrative Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Vol. 54, 327-336.
Jacobson, D. (2006). Ethical Criticism and the Vice of Moderation. Kieran, Matthew (Ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and The Philosophy of Art (pp. 342-355). Blackwell publishing Ltd.
John, E. (2006) Artistic Value and Opportunistic Moralism. Kieran, Matthew (Ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and The Philosophy of Art (pp. 331-341). Blackwell publishing Ltd.
Kant, I. (1790). The Critique of Judgement. Hackett Publishing Company.
Kieran, M. (2003). Forbidden Knowledge: The Challenge of Immoralism. In Jose Luis Bermudez & Sebastian Gardner (Eds.), Art and Morality. Routledge.
Lamarque, P. (2009). The Philosophy of Literature. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Shi, Y. (2013). Review of Wolfgang Iser & His Reception Theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol. 3, 982-986.
Wilde, O. (1891). The Picture of Dorian Gray. Penguin Classics.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2302-07
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157