Agreement Strategies Among Malaysian Chinese Speakers of English
Abstract
This research aims to discover the agreement strategies adopted by Malaysian Chinese speakers of English in an academic discussion. Using Brown and Levinson’s (1987) Politeness Principle and Speech Acts as frameworks, it seeks to find out the reasons governing their choice of agreement strategies. Student discussions were recorded, transcribed and analysed. Review sessions were also carried out to gain insight into the speakers’ choice of strategies. Analysis of the data revealed five agreement strategies employed by the students during a discussion. During the discussions, the students expressed the speech act of agreement, which support the hearer’s positive face, by directly agreeing with the previous speaker, building upon the previous speaker’s turn, completing and repeating part of the previous speaker’s utterance and giving positive feedback. Of all the strategies, the most often employed and is sustained throughout the discussions is positive feedback. This is followed by building upon utterances, completion of the previous speaker’s utterance and direct agreement. Apart from the Chinese cultural values which may influence the group’s agreement strategies, the findings also reveal that gender has an influence in the participants’ choice of agreement strategies since four out of the five strategies are mainly employed by the female participants. In sum, Malaysian Chinese speakers of English have their own communicative style when expressing agreement acts which is influenced by their cultural values and gender.
Keywords: agreement strategies; Chinese cultural values; speech act; politeness principles; gender
DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-12
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Aziz Idris. (1991). Sociocultural rules and linguistic manifestations: Aspects of politeness strategies in English and Malay. Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature. Pusat Bahasa UKM. Vol. 1.
Atkinson, M. and Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bond, M. H. (1991). Beyond the Chinese Face: Insights from Psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Boonjeera Chiravate (2011). Perception of politeness in English requests by Thai EFL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. Vol. 17(2), 59 -71.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chen, R. (1993). Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 20, 49-75.
Chen, R. (2001). Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 33, 87-106.
Chick, J. K. (1996). Intercultural communication. In McKay, S. and Hornberger, N. H. (Ed.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 329-348). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coates, J. (ed.). (1998). Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Coates, J. (1989). Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In Coates, J. and Cameron, D. (Eds.), Women in their speech Communities (pp 226-253). London: Longman.
De Kadt, E. (1998). The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 29, 173-191.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: essays on face to face behaviour. In Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 306-320). London: Routledge.
Gu, Yue Guo. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 14, 237-257.
Hogg, R. and Denison, D. (Eds.), (2006) A History of the English Language. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
Hu Wengzhong and Cornelius Grove. (1999). Encountering the Chinese: A guide for Americans. Maine: Intercultural Press. Inc.
Hu, Hsien Chin. (1944). The Chinese concept of face. American Anthropologist. Vol. 46, 45-64.
Jamaliah Mohd Ali. (1995). The pragmatics of cross-cultural communication in a Malaysian context. In Zainab Abdul Majid and Loga Mahesan Baskaran (Eds.), Rules of speaking: Verbal interactions at play (pp. 112-124). Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications.
Jamaliah Mohd Ali. (2000). Verbal Communication: A Study of Malaysian Speakers. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
Jefferson, G. (1979). Transcript notation. In Schriffin, D. (Ed.), (1994) Approaches to discourse (pp. 424-431). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 14, 193-217.
Kitao, K. (1989). Differences between politeness strategies
used in requests by Americans and Japanese. In Kitao, K. and
Kitao, S. K. (Eds.), Intercultural communication between Japan and the United States. Tokyo: Eichosha Shinsha Co., Ltd.
Kotkoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of reference preference structures. Language in Society. Vol. 22, 193-216.
Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 21, 451-486.
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 12, 403-426.
Muntigl, P. and Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 29,
-256.
Nwoye, O. G. (1992). Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural
variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 18, 309-328.
Pilkington, J. (1992). ‘Don’t try to make out that I’m nice!’ The different strategies women and men use when gossiping. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 5, 37-60.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred /dispreferred turn shapes. In Georgakopoulou, A. (2001). Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of
Pragmatics. Vol. 33, 1881-1900.
Reese-Miller, J. (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 32, 1087-1111.
Renwick, G. W. (1980). If Australians are arrogant, are Americans boring? If Americans are arrogant, are Australians boring?. In Smith, L.E. (Ed.), (1983) Readings in English as an international language. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Rui Li, Raja Rozina Raja Suleiman & Azimah Sazalie. (2015). An Investigation into Chinese EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. Vol. 15(2), 1-12.
Sai-huo Kuo. (1994). Agreement and disagreement strategies in a radio conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, Vol. 27, 95-121.
Scheerhorn, D. R. (1991). Politeness in decision-making. Research on Language and Social Interaction, Vol. 25, 253-273.
Schriffin, D. (1984). Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society. Vol. 13, 311-335.
Schriffin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In Mey,
J. L. (Ed.), (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Sinar Harian (26 July 2016) Jumlah Penduduk Cina menurun. Retrieved from: http://www.sinarharian.com.my/nasional/jumlah-penduduk-cina-menurun-1.545187
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2001). Disagreement in authentic Chinese-British business meetings: Unpackaging the role of culture. Paper presented at the Regional Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology ‘Capitalising on Diversity’. Winchester.
Sridhar, K. (1991). Speech acts in an indigenized variety: Sociocultural values and language variation. In Cheshire, J. (ed.). (1991). English Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suwako Watanabe. (1995). Cultural differences in framing: American and Japanese group discussions. In Tannen, D. (Ed.), (1995). Framing in discourse (pp. 176-209). New York: Oxford University Press.
Triandis, C. H. et al. (1988). Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. Vol. 12(3), 260-271.
Valentine, T. M. (1995). Agreeing and disagreeing in Indian English discourse: Implications for language teaching. In Tickoo, M. (Ed.), Language and culture in multilingual societies (pp. 227-250). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional
Language Centre.
Waterman, A. (1984). The psychology of individualism. New York: Praeger. In Goh Bee Chen (Ed.), (1996). Negotiating with the Chinese. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Contrastive sociolinguistics and the theory of “Cultural Scripts”: Chinese vs English. In Hellinger,
M. and Ammon, U. (Ed.), (1996). Contrastive sociolinguistics (pp. 313-342). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
eISSN : 2550-2247
ISSN : 0128-5157